Topazan
|
|
October 15, 2012, 04:04:32 AM |
|
That's what I've read. It certainly reduces the spoiler effect, greatly, but since one candidate can knock another one to a lower level, there's still the potential for similar candidates to inadvertently sabotage each other.
I don't have a full understanding of the math involved, but that's what I read. One of these days I need to run some simulations of my own.
You know, I wonder what effect approval voting would have on parties. One of the functions of parties in the current system, the primaries, would be rendered unnecessary.
|
Save the last bitcoin for me!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the
subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The
subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2121
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
October 15, 2012, 04:56:59 AM |
|
That's what I've read. It certainly reduces the spoiler effect, greatly, but since one candidate can knock another one to a lower level, there's still the potential for similar candidates to inadvertently sabotage each other.
I don't have a full understanding of the math involved, but that's what I read. One of these days I need to run some simulations of my own.
You know, I wonder what effect approval voting would have on parties. One of the functions of parties in the current system, the primaries, would be rendered unnecessary.
I'm sure it would mean that campaigns were more positive than negative since it would be more advantageous to make sure your own views and opinions got out there than to spend time and money tearing down a dozen other candidates.
|
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
|
420
|
|
October 15, 2012, 09:56:29 PM |
|
That's what I've read. It certainly reduces the spoiler effect, greatly, but since one candidate can knock another one to a lower level, there's still the potential for similar candidates to inadvertently sabotage each other.
I don't have a full understanding of the math involved, but that's what I read. One of these days I need to run some simulations of my own.
You know, I wonder what effect approval voting would have on parties. One of the functions of parties in the current system, the primaries, would be rendered unnecessary.
I'm sure it would mean that campaigns were more positive than negative since it would be more advantageous to make sure your own views and opinions got out there than to spend time and money tearing down a dozen other candidates. approval voting woudln't help that
|
Donations: 1JVhKjUKSjBd7fPXQJsBs5P3Yphk38AqPr - TIPS the hacks, the hacks, secure your bits!
|
|
|
Topazan
|
|
October 15, 2012, 10:12:34 PM |
|
That's what I've read. It certainly reduces the spoiler effect, greatly, but since one candidate can knock another one to a lower level, there's still the potential for similar candidates to inadvertently sabotage each other.
I don't have a full understanding of the math involved, but that's what I read. One of these days I need to run some simulations of my own.
You know, I wonder what effect approval voting would have on parties. One of the functions of parties in the current system, the primaries, would be rendered unnecessary.
I'm sure it would mean that campaigns were more positive than negative since it would be more advantageous to make sure your own views and opinions got out there than to spend time and money tearing down a dozen other candidates. approval voting woudln't help that Why wouldn't it? On the matter of parties, what I was wondering is whether or not primary voting would still be necessary. There would be no disadvantage to one party running multiple candidates. There could be both party-wide campaigning (vote for a member of our party) and individual campaigning (vote for me specifically). Then again, I suppose they would still need to come to some agreement about which group of candidates they endorse.
|
Save the last bitcoin for me!
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2121
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
October 15, 2012, 11:48:56 PM |
|
approval voting woudln't help that
I don't know. I'm glad you do.
|
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2121
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
October 15, 2012, 11:57:19 PM |
|
On the matter of parties, what I was wondering is whether or not primary voting would still be necessary. There would be no disadvantage to one party running multiple candidates. There could be both party-wide campaigning (vote for a member of our party) and individual campaigning (vote for me specifically). Then again, I suppose they would still need to come to some agreement about which group of candidates they endorse.
With any luck, it might loosen the hold the parties have on the candidates.
|
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
|
420
|
|
October 16, 2012, 01:13:37 AM |
|
On the matter of parties, what I was wondering is whether or not primary voting would still be necessary. There would be no disadvantage to one party running multiple candidates. There could be both party-wide campaigning (vote for a member of our party) and individual campaigning (vote for me specifically). Then again, I suppose they would still need to come to some agreement about which group of candidates they endorse.
With any luck, it might loosen the hold the parties have on the candidates. that it would do
|
Donations: 1JVhKjUKSjBd7fPXQJsBs5P3Yphk38AqPr - TIPS the hacks, the hacks, secure your bits!
|
|
|
|