USA vs RUSSIA

[popcorn1]

ALL HANDBAGS AT 10 PACERS
we be fools to go to war with each other

 now go check out R3D COIN WONT HURT TO LOOK good coin to own freedom of speech

[1714672183]

1714672183

[1714672183]

1714672183

[1714672183]

1714672183

[Spendulus]

Yeah, let's all launch our nukes and see how many "winners" there are. 

Well, history says one thing about who can win a war with Vietnam.

It says...

Don't fuck with Vietnam...

[wxa7115]

The stronger army belongs to US but it's irrelevant. Army's were made irrelevant by the development of nuclear weapons. If an hypothetical WWIII were to happen MAD will be assured, especially if we take into account the most fearsome of all the weapons... Biological Weapons.

[bryant.coleman]

The stronger army belongs to US but it's irrelevant. Army's were made irrelevant by the development of nuclear weapons. If an hypothetical WWIII were to happen MAD will be assured, especially if we take into account the most fearsome of all the weapons... Biological Weapons.

It is partially correct. Having a  larger army does not guarantee anyone a sure shot victory in warfare. Still, it can offer an initial advantage to the warring sides. And having nuclear weapons alone is not enough. Without quality ICBMs, the nukes will be useless. Also, if the opposing side is having good air-defense systems, the nuclear attack will be difficult. 

[criptix]

The stronger army belongs to US but it's irrelevant. Army's were made irrelevant by the development of nuclear weapons. If an hypothetical WWIII were to happen MAD will be assured, especially if we take into account the most fearsome of all the weapons... Biological Weapons.

It is partially correct. Having a  larger army does not guarantee anyone a sure shot victory in warfare. Still, it can offer an initial advantage to the warring sides. And having nuclear weapons alone is not enough. Without quality ICBMs, the nukes will be useless. Also, if the opposing side is having good air-defense systems, the nuclear attack will be difficult. 

That is why the US and Russia developed MIRV's/MARV's which makes a defense not possible/extremely difficult.

M.A.D. is still working today.

[pinball8]

absolutely USA.
we know if the reference currency is Dollars America.
and the country  superpower have recognized in this world is USA.
although the two country still having hostility each other.
and want to maintain or fight to be number one country.

[PaoloSerBit]

US military is stronger but nowadays I don't think anyone would be interested in this kind of conflict - USA isn't involved enough in Eastern Europe and Russia is too weak to pose a real threat to them

[bryant.coleman]

That is why the US and Russia developed MIRV's/MARV's which makes a defense not possible/extremely difficult.

The Russians claim that their S-400 Triumf air-defense system is effective against all types of MIRV. Also, the American MIRV technology is not as much advanced as that of the Russians. With the development of the S-500, the capability of the Americans to launch a nuclear strike against the Russians will be greatly reduced.

[cryptocoiner]

This conversation is pointless. It's obvious that american military forces are way stronger than russian. American tehnology is just better. American economy several times bigger. And there is just more people living in america. But this war is impossible because russia has nuclear weapons.

[ridery99]

If we fight a nuclear war , we lose. Does it matter if there are a few Russian or Americans left who can decide that they won?

You are wrong. Russia will win the coming nuclear war. 

[cryptocoiner]

If we fight a nuclear war , we lose. Does it matter if there are a few Russian or Americans left who can decide that they won?

You are wrong. Russia will win the coming nuclear war. 

nope

[popcorn1]

If we fight a nuclear war , we lose. Does it matter if there are a few Russian or Americans left who can decide that they won?

You are wrong. Russia will win the coming nuclear war.  

your wrong too no one will win we will all be dead..but this will never happen..its all done for money and to lower the population  and to control the little people
i believe the super rich call us the little people..

[btccashacc]

how long this war will continue? 

[Sourgummies]

This war is a cold one, but nature is warming it up.
Posturing is always necessary or some one takes a look at the cookies and decides to have a nibble.
Watch any American President and his body language with potentially hostile Countries, its exaggerated on purpose. Bigger board, bigger exaggerations.

[wxa7115]

That is why the US and Russia developed MIRV's/MARV's which makes a defense not possible/extremely difficult.

The Russians claim that their S-400 Triumf air-defense system is effective against all types of MIRV. Also, the American MIRV technology is not as much advanced as that of the Russians. With the development of the S-500, the capability of the Americans to launch a nuclear strike against the Russians will be greatly reduced.

I'll be honest and say that I do not know that much about particular weapons or systems of defense (maybe you are a military). However, there are a few more roads to MAD than just dropping bombs over cities.

As far as I know is forbidden to explode atomics bombs on space (or was the high atmosphere) and the reason is that if you do that an EMP is created. With enough bombs it could be possible (in theory) to destroy every satellite and almost all electronics on earth. Taking us to a pre Industrial Revolution era (or maybe even a dark age)

Another way will be with the use of biological weapons, if Russia was losing a hypothetical WWIII and they faced total destruction, they might as well destroy the whole human race, after all Russia will have nothing to lose at that point.