Bitcoin Forum
November 10, 2024, 11:29:15 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Satoshi Nakamoto satoshi speaks  (Read 758 times)
onewiseguy (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 15, 2015, 10:58:40 PM
 #1

[bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
Satoshi Nakamoto satoshi at vistomail.com
Sat Aug 15 17:43:54 UTC 2015

    Previous message: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT 0.11A
    Next message: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
    Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I have been following the recent block size debates through the mailing list.  I had hoped the debate would resolve and that a fork proposal would achieve widespread consensus.  However with the formal release of Bitcoin XT 0.11A, this looks unlikely to happen, and so I am forced to share my concerns about this very dangerous fork.

The developers of this pretender-Bitcoin claim to be following my original vision, but nothing could be further from the truth.  When I designed Bitcoin, I designed it in such a way as to make future modifications to the consensus rules difficult without near unanimous agreement.  Bitcoin was designed to be protected from the influence of charismatic leaders, even if their name is Gavin Andresen, Barack Obama, or Satoshi Nakamoto.  Nearly everyone has to agree on a change, and they have to do it without being forced or pressured into it.  By doing a fork in this way, these developers are violating the "original vision" they claim to honour.

They use my old writings to make claims about what Bitcoin was supposed to be.  However I acknowledge that a lot has changed since that time, and new knowledge has been gained that contradicts some of my early opinions.  For example I didn't anticipate pooled mining and its effects on the security of the network.  Making Bitcoin a competitive monetary system while also preserving its security properties is not a trivial problem, and we should take more time to come up with a robust solution.  I suspect we need a better incentive for users to run nodes instead of relying solely on altruism.

If two developers can fork Bitcoin and succeed in redefining what "Bitcoin" is, in the face of widespread technical criticism and through the use of populist tactics, then I will have no choice but to declare Bitcoin a failed project.  Bitcoin was meant to be both technically and socially robust.  This present situation has been very disappointing to watch unfold.

Satoshi Nakamoto

    Previous message: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT 0.11A
    Next message: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT Fork
    Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the bitcoin-dev mailing list
unamis76
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012


View Profile
August 15, 2015, 10:59:40 PM
 #2

Fourth thread about the same thing, and counting Grin
GermanGiant
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 501



View Profile
August 15, 2015, 11:00:24 PM
 #3

You are two hours late. There are already four threads regarding this.
onewiseguy (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 15, 2015, 11:01:48 PM
 #4

thanks I will lock it.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!