johnyj
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
|
 |
August 16, 2015, 10:48:15 PM |
|
The biggest question is: Why 20MB when you can go with much less risky 4MB or even 8MB?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
harrymmmm
|
|
August 16, 2015, 10:53:08 PM |
|
The biggest question is: Why 20MB when you can go with much less risky 4MB or even 8MB?
20MB hasn't been on the table for some time now. XT is implementing bip101, which is initially 8MB. |
|
|
|
|
|
kenbytes
|
|
August 16, 2015, 10:57:10 PM |
|
i think bitcoin open new business oportunity for a lott of people ..i think it`s anough to survive  )) |
|
|
|
|
maokoto
|
|
August 17, 2015, 12:51:58 AM |
|
They will reach an agreement before Bitcoin falls and ruin them. To reach to the time when the actual block size is not enough without having a solution would mean big losses for both sides, and they would not have those loses.
|
|
|
|
|
Mickeyb
|
|
August 18, 2015, 07:40:15 PM |
|
The biggest question is: Why 20MB when you can go with much less risky 4MB or even 8MB?
20MB hasn't been on the table for some time now. XT is implementing bip101, which is initially 8MB. It is implementing 8MB blocks, but Gavin also claims that having 20MB blocks by his calculations is completely safe. Now, why 20MB when even 1 MB is enough at the moment? Well probably so we don't have to go through this same BS several years down the road, at least that was his initial thinking, when he expected that the block size increase would go smoother. When he saw how tough nut is to crack with the 20MB, he has probably lowered the increase to the 8MB. |
|
|
|
|
|
harrymmmm
|
|
August 19, 2015, 01:05:45 AM |
|
The biggest question is: Why 20MB when you can go with much less risky 4MB or even 8MB?
20MB hasn't been on the table for some time now. XT is implementing bip101, which is initially 8MB. It is implementing 8MB blocks, but Gavin also claims that having 20MB blocks by his calculations is completely safe. Now, why 20MB when even 1 MB is enough at the moment? Well probably so we don't have to go through this same BS several years down the road, at least that was his initial thinking, when he expected that the block size increase would go smoother. When he saw how tough nut is to crack with the 20MB, he has probably lowered the increase to the 8MB. So ... what i said. Noone is looking at 20MB blocks any more. Why even bring it up at all? |
|
|
|
|
|
slaveforanunnak1
|
|
August 19, 2015, 06:02:40 AM |
|
Price to less than $100 before Wednesday. Bet me.
No. It wont. Both party holds enough bitcoin to resist the price. Let me know how much you wanna bet and whether ready to escrow ? Unless the cia used their fancy tools to make gavin destroy btc. |
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
August 19, 2015, 07:31:58 AM |
|
The biggest question is: Why 20MB when you can go with much less risky 4MB or even 8MB?
in the principle it was done to avoid forking again and again after every need, to not cause trouble like you see right now(random crash) but then chinese were against it and it was reduced to 8mb, but they are still against the idea of XT, and we probably end up upgrading it directly into core, with far more a less-severe increase, like 2MB |
|
|
|
|
NextTroll
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
August 19, 2015, 07:35:00 AM |
|
Gavin Andresen decided to do the project and the opinion of the developers don't care about it
|
|
|
|
|
momore
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
August 19, 2015, 07:42:16 AM |
|
Really crazy. Thanks for the link. |
|
|
|
|
NextTroll
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
August 19, 2015, 07:49:08 AM |
|
Really crazy. Thanks for the link. 100$ , dreaming  |
|
|
|
|
Kakmakr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3444
Merit: 1957
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
August 19, 2015, 08:31:26 AM |
|
I also do not like the little communication coming from the Core def team, but I prefer that over the rubbish being communicated from the Mike|Gavin team to promote a GovFork. These guys are going to plough into the gate so hard and it's going to hurt their reputation in the Bitcoin community for years to come.
Gavin should never have teamed up with Mike. He is way to unstable and would take Gavin down with him, when his fork fail. ^hmf^
|
| ..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄
██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████
██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀
██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██
██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██
██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████
██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀
██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██
▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄
█ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌
█ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █
█ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌
█ ██████████ █ ▐ █
█ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌
█ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █
█ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌
█ █▐ █
█ █▐▐▌
█ █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄
██ ▐█▌ ██
████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀ █████████████ ▀███
██ ███████████ ██
▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀
▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████ ███████▀
▀█████▄ ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
MoorChael
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
August 19, 2015, 08:44:53 AM |
|
Hi guys. Do you really believe that all bad?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eodguy149
|
|
August 19, 2015, 10:47:44 AM |
|
"The end of Bitcoin" You should Google Bitcoin obituaries. Bitcoin has been extremely resilient in the face of adversity. The price may suffer in the short term but it isn't going anywhere  |
"Initial Success or Total Failure"
|
|
|
kelsey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 19, 2015, 12:33:37 PM |
|
"The end of Bitcoin" You should Google Bitcoin obituaries. Bitcoin has been extremely resilient in the face of adversity. that's why they are not killing it directly. but heading for a centralised, regulated watered down version of the original bitcoin  "The Bitcoin Core project has shown it cannot reform and so it must be abandoned." Mike Hearn thats what he really wants, full control. |
|
|
|
|
|
