|
August 21, 2015, 11:01:31 AM Last edit: August 21, 2015, 11:40:28 AM by JBC |
|
The leading alternates are all controlled opposition. They are either made to look bad, have irrecoverable disasters or to be jokes and by doing so this deflects people from discovering real competitors like NXT.
Imagine you are someone new to Bitcoin and just found out about alternates. You are told the number 2 coin is a clone of Bitcoin and the number 3 coin was another clone of Bitcoin but with a big fat yellow dog on the label: this was cryptocurrency between 2013 and 2014. The end result is you think alternates are pretty dumb and stay away or do not bother investigating it more.
This is pure pyschological warfare it is very successful and it is the reason why Bitcoin remains unchallenged. The generalized and first impressions of alternates based on Litecoin and Doge is what keeps people away from alternates, ignorant about the real competition and keeps Bitcoin safe! This is controlled opposition tactics and it works well in many applications, especially in politics, and it works here in crypto too.
Today we have this false dichotomy of Dash. If you think something which would enable more criminality, especially pedophilia and terrorism, would make it more susceptible to mainstream adoption then you are a... *insert epileptic*
Controlled opposition list check list:
✓ Do they have the presence of early Bitcoin adopters pushing them? ✓ Does Cryptomedia, especially CoinDesk, hold a bias in favor of them? ✓ Do they lack innovation (or deliverance?)
Clearly the leading alternates are all controlled opposition.
|