Bitcoin Forum
August 27, 2024, 03:17:36 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How should blocksize scale for greater volume of Transactions
BIP101 (8MB x 2 every 2 yrs) - 1 (50%)
Not at all (1MB forever) - 1 (50%)
Dynamically based on volume - 0 (0%)
Dynamically based on volume but limited by Moore's law to prevent centralization - 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 2

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: How should Blocksize scale for greater volume of Transactions  (Read 1038 times)
Was (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 14

We are Satoshi.


View Profile
August 25, 2015, 01:18:57 AM
 #1

Option 4 Would be my choice, if Network grew to outpace capabilities of Machine and bandwidth, and began to sacrifice  centralization, this would create a fee market which further incentivizes advancement of technological capability. (while still allowing transactions to be processed)

Poll on

was

We Are Satoshi.
DannyHamilton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3472
Merit: 4790



View Profile
August 25, 2015, 01:28:38 AM
 #2

I'd vote, but I don't see an option for "none of the above".
Was (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 14

We are Satoshi.


View Profile
August 25, 2015, 01:43:12 AM
 #3

I'd vote, but I don't see an option for "none of the above".


Well, I figured that was called "reply".

We Are Satoshi.
skang
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 452
Merit: 252


from democracy to self-rule.


View Profile
August 25, 2015, 02:01:40 AM
 #4

I would say never and rather reduce as we have further abstract the protocol.

"India is the guru of the nations, the physician of the human soul in its profounder maladies; she is destined once more to remould the life of the world and restore the peace of the human spirit.
But Swaraj is the necessary condition of her work and before she can do the work, she must fulfil the condition."
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!