Do you trust Maths?

[—]

Straight forward really. This being a cryptocurrency forum a very loop-sided result is likely the odd troll will drop by i guess.


If you have something with a Circumference of 40075 units that gives a Radius of 6378.13 units
All good so far or?
Now if you take an Arc length of 1 unit of the 40075 it gives 0.0089831627002087 of a Degree (Angle)
All sweet, good.
With the above radius and degree you have a:
Chord length of 0.9999999989757555 unit (a wee bit less than the arc length of 1) and Sagitta (Height) of 0.00001959822085957352

Yes or No (lets say accurate to 6 decimal places in sagitta height)


http://www.handymath.com/cgi-bin/arc18.cgi?submit=Entry

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1171622.msg12359254#msg12359254


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzRlsvWj8Hc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YQ0dMJEjsk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wg2deAEhoF4
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015/08/200-proofs-earth-is-not-spinning-ball.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WPBDte2AfY    
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6y0H5UOHDhY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlJ7kdJOTUI  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTqmcvdm4hM
https://youtu.be/D_j_SUAwafU gravity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SES_3tSqvF4 german map of hollow earth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mU2NM3PRbAg    a great laugh moon taking sharp turns 4 part
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFi98T8phoI    interview with submariene chief
https://youtu.be/9BSKVE9pp60    interview with land surveyor
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TL30VW5hJY interview with flight instructor


http://aplanetruth.info/23-why-was-nasa-created/flat-earth-images/
.

[OBAViJEST]

Uh... Do I trust maths in what regard?

Are you asking me if I believe 1+1=2?

[Vod]

Uh... Do I trust maths in what regard?

Are you asking me if I believe 1+1=2?

1+1=10, as least according to quadrillions of transactions per day...

[—]

Uh... Do I trust maths in what regard?

Are you asking me if I believe 1+1=2?

More or less a little more complex.

If you have something with a Circumference of 40075 units
that gives a Radius of 6378.13 units
All good so far or? Now if you take an Arc length of 1 unit of the 40075 it gives 0.0089831627002087 of a Degree (Angle)
All sweet or, good.
With the above radius and degree you have a:
Chord length of 0.9999999989757555 unit (a wee bit less than the arc length of 1) and Sagitta (Height) of 0.00001959822085957352

Is it a Yes or No (lets say to 6 decimal places in sagitta height)

[Wheel1312]

I'm not sure what you are talking about but everyone trusts maths just by existing otherwise nothing would make sense

[OBAViJEST]

Uh... Do I trust maths in what regard?

Are you asking me if I believe 1+1=2?

More or less a little more complex.

If you have something with a Circumference of 40075 units
that gives a Radius of 6378.13 units
All good so far or? Now if you take an Arc length of 1 unit of the 40075 it gives 0.0089831627002087 of a Degree (Angle)
All sweet or, good.
With the above radius and degree you have a:
Chord length of 0.9999999989757555 unit (a wee bit less than the arc length of 1) and Sagitta (Height) of 0.00001959822085957352

Is it a Yes or No (lets say to 6 decimal places in sagitta height)

I'd have to say it's all circumstantial

[Lethn]

If the maths is wrong then usually it's the fault of the human being not the numbers.

[OBAViJEST]

But what about physics of other worlds?  Math/science 'laws' are mostly concluded by studies done on earth, without another planet to base results against...pretty one sided if you ask me 

[—]

I'm not sure what you are talking about but everyone trusts maths just by existing otherwise nothing would make sense

You know maths it is right just admit it.

[Foxpup]

Guys, this is the guy from the Flat Earth thread who doesn't understand how gravity works. This is relevant to the question because 6378.13 is Earth's equatorial radius in kilometres. OP is really asking "will a straight line 1 kilometre long across the Earth's surface go 1.95982208596 centimetres underground? (accurate to within 6 decimal places, or a tenth of a micron)", which is plainly false as it disregards the fact that the Earth isn't a perfect sphere, and local topography over a 1 kilometre distance will vary by much more than 1.95982208596 centimetres, let alone 0.1 microns. It is not clear what OP hopes to prove beyond his ignorance of basic science and mathematics.

[SparkedDev]

Guys, this is the guy from the Flat Earth thread who doesn't understand how gravity works. This is relevant to the question because 6378.13 is Earth's equatorial radius in kilometres. OP is really asking "will a straight line 1 kilometre long across the Earth's surface go 1.95982208596 centimetres underground? (accurate to within 6 decimal places, or a tenth of a micron)", which is plainly false as it disregards the fact that the Earth isn't a perfect sphere, and local topography over a 1 kilometre distance will vary by much more than 1.95982208596 centimetres, let alone 0.1 microns. It is not clear what OP hopes to prove beyond his ignorance of basic science and mathematics.

Look at you mr walking wikipedia.
As he said over time the earth has been pulled on by multiple points of gravity moon mars and the sun and other thing, what happen when you pull on a balloons sides. The magic oval happens that what.

[cakir]

Uh... Do I trust maths in what regard?

Are you asking me if I believe 1+1=2?

1+1=10, as least according to quadrillions of transactions per day...

No!
(1+1=10)₂

(There're 10 types of people, who knows binary and who don't.)

[abody1233]

I click no on the vote

[—]

Guys, this is the guy from the Flat Earth thread who doesn't understand how gravity works. This is relevant to the question because 6378.13 is Earth's equatorial radius in kilometres. OP is really asking "will a straight line 1 kilometre long across the Earth's surface go 1.95982208596 centimetres underground? (accurate to within 6 decimal places, or a tenth of a micron)", which is plainly false as it disregards the fact that the Earth isn't a perfect sphere, and local topography over a 1 kilometre distance will vary by much more than 1.95982208596 centimetres, let alone 0.1 microns. It is not clear what OP hopes to prove beyond his ignorance of basic science and mathematics.

If anyone is interested making a whole lot of money. Build a 1 km long pool and charge entry fee by showing of the 2 cm hump in the middle. It is truly something but careful don't overdo it building a 10 km long pool gives you a awesome 2 m mathematical certified pump.
The equatorial cities Balikpapan Indonesia and Quito Ecuador are 18,293 km apart (12637 km underwater straight line) separated only by the pacific ocean which in the middle has a whopping 5508.60307 km elevation. 
The age of awakening.
 

[Gleb Gamow]

Guys, this is the guy from the Flat Earth thread who doesn't understand how gravity works. This is relevant to the question because 6378.13 is Earth's equatorial radius in kilometres. OP is really asking "will a straight line 1 kilometre long across the Earth's surface go 1.95982208596 centimetres underground? (accurate to within 6 decimal places, or a tenth of a micron)", which is plainly false as it disregards the fact that the Earth isn't a perfect sphere, and local topography over a 1 kilometre distance will vary by much more than 1.95982208596 centimetres, let alone 0.1 microns. It is not clear what OP hopes to prove beyond his ignorance of basic science and mathematics.

If anyone is interested making a whole lot of money. Build a 1 km long pool and charge entry fee by showing of the 2 cm hump in the middle. It is truly something but careful don't overdo it building a 10 km long pool gives you a awesome 2 m mathematical certified pump.
The equatorial cities Balikpapan Indonesia and Quito Ecuador are 18,293 km apart (12637 km underwater straight line) separated only by the pacific ocean which in the middle has a whopping 5508.60307 km elevation. 
The age of awakening.
 

How the fuck can something so simple be read five times and still tryin' get my head wrapped around it? I mean, now every time I take a sip of coffee I envision a peak in the center even when the cup is tilted. I'm pretty sure at Starbucks they charge extra for that.

Wait a sec! <just thought of this prior to posting> Isn't that a lot of weight in that hump? I'm surprised gravity hasn't pulled in down, flooding the two coastal cities. Paradox?

[—]

Guys, this is the guy from the Flat Earth thread who doesn't understand how gravity works. This is relevant to the question because 6378.13 is Earth's equatorial radius in kilometres. OP is really asking "will a straight line 1 kilometre long across the Earth's surface go 1.95982208596 centimetres underground? (accurate to within 6 decimal places, or a tenth of a micron)", which is plainly false as it disregards the fact that the Earth isn't a perfect sphere, and local topography over a 1 kilometre distance will vary by much more than 1.95982208596 centimetres, let alone 0.1 microns. It is not clear what OP hopes to prove beyond his ignorance of basic science and mathematics.

If anyone is interested making a whole lot of money. Build a 1 km long pool and charge entry fee by showing of the 2 cm hump in the middle. It is truly something but careful don't overdo it building a 10 km long pool gives you a awesome 2 m mathematical certified pump.
The equatorial cities Balikpapan Indonesia and Quito Ecuador are 18,293 km apart (12637 km underwater straight line) separated only by the pacific ocean which in the middle has a whopping 5508.60307 km elevation. 
The age of awakening.
 

How the fuck can something so simple be read five times and still tryin' get my head wrapped around it? I mean, now every time I take a sip of coffee I envision a peak in the center even when the cup is tilted. I'm pretty sure at Starbucks they charge extra for that.

Wait a sec! <just thought of this prior to posting> Isn't that a lot of weight in that hump? I'm surprised gravity hasn't pulled in down, flooding the two coastal cities. Paradox?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fk4YqPtvJao

[kampretkabur]

math is an agreement, i dont trust it, i need it

[dragonwoman]

who would hate math???math is life...my grades are always extremely high... my highest is 75% out of 100%...75% being the passing rate...if i get lucky i would get 77 to 79 like that...hahaha.. #ihatemath..

[RealBitcoin]

I was really shitty at math in high school, i always hated it, and never realized why is it useful.

I especially was learning tons of trigonometry and calculus. I was just so fed up with it.

Then came bitcoin, and it changed my stance to maths. I just realize that its really really important. Even if i`m too dumb to understand it, somebody will, and they will do nice things with it.

Cryptography is really the saviour of privacy!

[—]

I click no on the vote

All cool, but a little explanation would help otherwise it's pure trolling. What about your pay-check would't you trust it?