Bitcoin Forum
April 25, 2024, 02:26:00 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Anyone interested in a bitcoin for [s]cash[/s] gold in the mail escrow service?  (Read 534 times)
Anon136 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
September 12, 2015, 03:20:12 AM
Last edit: September 14, 2015, 04:34:39 AM by Anon136
 #1

Please continue discussion here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179847

So I've been trying to think of a way to leverage my strong reputation here on the forums. Trying to think of a niche that could be filled. And I had this idea.

I thought maybe I could run an orderbook where people could place bids, asks or market orders and when ever an order was matched one party could send me bitcoins and the other cash in an envelope in the mail. I would subtract my fee and forward the funds two the respective parties. It would be a 0 hassle way to buy or sell bitcoins without being involved in the banking system and without fear of being scammed.

Also does anyone have any input on the legality of such an arrangement? Would I be considered a "money transmitter" and require a "money transmitters license"? It doesn't seem like it should since its just cash in the mail. That would make gradma sending her grandson a birthday card a money transmitter.

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
1714011960
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714011960

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714011960
Reply with quote  #2

1714011960
Report to moderator
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Sourgummies
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 500


Never ending parties are what Im into.


View Profile
September 12, 2015, 03:26:28 AM
 #2

Think the fact its bitcoin related would cause you headaches having to explain why you receive cash so often in the mail. They won't go after Grandma but they sure will go after you,at least thats how I presume it works. Always thought sending cash in the mail was something that put you on a radar. They might say you are a middle man for ISIS!
If you do go through with this,I wish you all the best and hope nothing bad comes of it. Smiley
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 2216


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
September 12, 2015, 03:40:48 AM
 #3

Who do I make the cheque out to?

Anon136 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
September 12, 2015, 04:06:16 AM
 #4

Yea even if its not illegal, being on these guys radar alone is dangerous enough. Perhaps too risky.

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
Timelord2067
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 2216


💲🏎️💨🚓


View Profile
September 12, 2015, 04:48:30 AM
 #5

Yea even if its not illegal, being on these guys radar alone is dangerous enough. Perhaps too risky.

...and for anyone sending cash, get ready to hit negative feedback / trust when the "I didn't receive your cash in the mail, the mailman must have stolen it." Ruse is used.

...and for Anon136 - messing with your head time - every note you receive in the mail will be marked by the CIA / FBI / KGB / CI5 / MI6 / CONTROL / KAOS / RU12 and the little old lady with the flower shop down the road.

Enjoy.  Grin

Anon136 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
September 14, 2015, 03:09:37 AM
 #6

Yea even if its not illegal, being on these guys radar alone is dangerous enough. Perhaps too risky.

...and for anyone sending cash, get ready to hit negative feedback / trust when the "I didn't receive your cash in the mail, the mailman must have stolen it." Ruse is used.

...and for Anon136 - messing with your head time - every note you receive in the mail will be marked by the CIA / FBI / KGB / CI5 / MI6 / CONTROL / KAOS / RU12 and the little old lady with the flower shop down the road.

Enjoy.  Grin

It would have been tenable I think pre 911 I think Sad But then everyone had to go insane over a small fraction of as many people dying as in car crashes in a single year.

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
Anon136 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
September 14, 2015, 03:14:09 AM
 #7

Hey I just realized something. I'm happy to accept gold or silver instead. If you wanted to buy bitcoins without interfacing with the banking system you can just go down to your local coin shop, pick up a 1/10th ounce gold coin, throw it in an envelope and send away. Its an extra step but maybe not too much inconvenience. Almost everyone has a coin shop near them.

As long as no cash is involved im 99% sure the government wouldn't go bananas. They may come knock on my door and tell me to stop, but they wouldnt come to my house with a paramilitary detail and drag me off to one of their dungeons.

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
Anon136 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217



View Profile
September 14, 2015, 04:33:43 AM
 #8

Please continue discussion here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179847

Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041
If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!