Smokeasy
Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
Decentralized Block-chain Voting
|
|
September 28, 2015, 10:34:10 PM |
|
Also, I agree with the idea but I think most people would want one person = one vote instead of your system?
tbh, after learning how it works most people support the idea of one coin = one vote instead of one person = one vote. We chose the one coin = one vote for two important reasons: 1. We believe that those who have a bigger stake in the outcome should have a bigger voice in any decision, just like shareholders in a corporation. 2. Creating a one person = one vote voting system defeats the purpose and technology behind decentralization because a trusted-third-party is required to make sure that one person get one, and only one, vote, which would inherently centralize the voting. Thanks for answering questions. I see you guys make the Bitcoin Scrypt votes before the Bitcoin votes. The vote about changing Bitcoin Scrypt coin name before Bitcoin could be good for Bitcoin Scrypt. I just sent you PM. Got it. Just responded. Thx for offer to help.
|
CryptoVoter
|
|
|
KimNam
|
|
September 28, 2015, 11:14:24 PM |
|
- VOTING DATE DEADLINE: Is the voting date deadline confusing? Is there a better way?
Good questions. I'll try to give you my feedback on most of them after work. Here is my answer to the first question. No I don't think the voting date deadline thing is confusing. We should just focus on the voting block deadline mostly. The date thing is just a recommendation right? More feedback after work. Thanks. Yes. The voting date deadline is an estimate. Not sure if "recommendation" is the right word but it does fit.
|
|
|
|
bloods-n-cryptos
|
|
September 29, 2015, 12:26:28 AM |
|
Questions: Is 48 hours enough time before an estimated voting date deadline to announce the block? How best to estimate voting block deadline when mining hashes vary so much? I think a little more heads up than 48 hours would be better. I don't know your second question.
|
Any information provided in my posts is for educational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice, but you already knew that.
|
|
|
bloods-n-cryptos
|
|
September 29, 2015, 02:08:34 AM |
|
Questions: Should we consider an instant run-off system instead of having a separate run-off election if no answer gets >50% support? Separate would be better so we would know what the real options are for the vote but that's just my opinion.
|
Any information provided in my posts is for educational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice, but you already knew that.
|
|
|
bloods-n-cryptos
|
|
September 29, 2015, 02:10:46 AM Last edit: September 29, 2015, 05:27:38 AM by bloods-n-cryptos |
|
Questions: Any suggestions or comments on a better way to proceed for major votes besides using meta-votes? I think meta-votes are definitely necessary. More feedback after dinner tomorrow.
|
Any information provided in my posts is for educational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice, but you already knew that.
|
|
|
Smokeasy
Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
Decentralized Block-chain Voting
|
|
September 29, 2015, 05:31:58 AM |
|
Vote to get Bitcoin-sCrypt listed on Cryptopia. There are over 100 coins listed for voting and Bitcoin-sCrypt is one of the top coins (#1 in weekly user votes). We only get one user vote per day so log in and vote when you get a chance. https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/Home/Voting
|
CryptoVoter
|
|
|
|
Smokeasy
Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
Decentralized Block-chain Voting
|
|
September 29, 2015, 07:02:58 AM |
|
It is mostly referred to as Bitcoin sCrypt but it is not required and some refer to it as Bitcoin Scrypt.
|
CryptoVoter
|
|
|
|
bloods-n-cryptos
|
|
September 29, 2015, 04:30:52 PM |
|
Questions: Is once-a-month voting too frequent or not frequent enough? Should Bitcoin-sCrypt coordinate with Bitcoin-core re voting? I thought voting every two weeks was too often. Once a month might be ok but we should not vote just to vote. We should have things worth voting for.
|
Any information provided in my posts is for educational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice, but you already knew that.
|
|
|
bloods-n-cryptos
|
|
September 29, 2015, 04:31:41 PM |
|
I like that idea. Maybe after the name meta-vote in case the vote fails and becomes a moot point.
|
Any information provided in my posts is for educational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice, but you already knew that.
|
|
|
bloods-n-cryptos
|
|
September 29, 2015, 04:47:29 PM |
|
Questions: Is once-a-month voting too frequent or not frequent enough? Should Bitcoin-sCrypt coordinate with Bitcoin-core re voting? I thought voting every two weeks was too often. Once a month might be ok but we should not vote just to vote. We should have things worth voting for. Forgot to answer second question. Yes we should coordinate with Bitcoin core because it could give Bitcoin Scrypt more publicity.
|
Any information provided in my posts is for educational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice, but you already knew that.
|
|
|
bloods-n-cryptos
|
|
September 29, 2015, 05:42:48 PM |
|
Questions: Any other suggestions on a process or methodology to allow users to submit questions for the community to vote on (instead of giving developers sole discretion on what questions are presented to the community)? Trick question? Definitely allow us to suggest questions to be voted on. I like the idea of listing them here.
|
Any information provided in my posts is for educational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice, but you already knew that.
|
|
|
bloods-n-cryptos
|
|
September 29, 2015, 05:48:24 PM |
|
Questions: After the first vote, should we require +n confirmations in order for votes to count? If so, how many +n confirmations should be required to address the problems mentioned?
This is tricky. Need to think on this one.
|
Any information provided in my posts is for educational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice, but you already knew that.
|
|
|
|
Smokeasy
Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
Decentralized Block-chain Voting
|
|
September 29, 2015, 11:34:41 PM |
|
That's a good idea. We will look into a pre-poll.
|
CryptoVoter
|
|
|
Smokeasy
Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
Decentralized Block-chain Voting
|
|
September 29, 2015, 11:38:09 PM |
|
Questions: Is once-a-month voting too frequent or not frequent enough? Should Bitcoin-sCrypt coordinate with Bitcoin-core re voting? I thought voting every two weeks was too often. Once a month might be ok but we should not vote just to vote. We should have things worth voting for. Forgot to answer second question. Yes we should coordinate with Bitcoin core because it could give Bitcoin Scrypt more publicity. It could.
|
CryptoVoter
|
|
|
Smokeasy
Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
Decentralized Block-chain Voting
|
|
September 29, 2015, 11:47:12 PM |
|
|
CryptoVoter
|
|
|
KimNam
|
|
September 30, 2015, 12:37:51 AM |
|
This is a good idea. I like bitvotecoin
|
|
|
|
bloods-n-cryptos
|
|
September 30, 2015, 01:20:33 AM |
|
I was wondering who that was. Good one!
|
Any information provided in my posts is for educational purposes only and is not to be considered legal advice, but you already knew that.
|
|
|
|