[ANN] [LNC] LendCoin [CIMS] – BTCLend Collateral Coin – POS: 5%, 15% or 25%

[Yucayeque]

Users who bought coins will not sell for less than what they paid.

[kken01]

Users who bought coins will not sell for less than what they paid.

are you on drugs?
that makes no sense

ps:
still waiting for the patent #   or maybe its all bullshit false marketing

[o0o0]

Users who bought coins will not sell for less than what they paid.

So bitcoin should never reduce in price? Cmon man that's like more stupid than Garza's statements.

Lets take the share market too... people bought at cost and wouldn't sell below that? Cmon life has a lot more variables than that.

Why did your dad sell his paycoin below the purchase price / $20 floor then?

[suchmoon]

Users who bought coins will not sell for less than what they paid.

Are you aware of the other part of the market price equation, i.e. the demand? How is the demand going to be created for the price to stay above $2? Please explain in full detail.

Also please explain what would happen to the staking proceeds (the 5%, 15% or 25% mentioned in your thread title). Since users don't pay for those coins according to your statement they can sell it as low as they want. What will that do to the price?

[Yucayeque]

I feel sorry for the people who are trying to succeed, because of people like you guys; patience is needed in BitcoinTalk. I will not reply to you guys, we really don't need investors with this type of behavior. Please stop spamming on this post...

[kken01]

ah asking vital questions and trying to verify your patent claim is spamming. i get you
blind faith is required with this coin

[suchmoon]

I feel sorry for the people who are trying to succeed, because of people like you guys; patience is needed in BitcoinTalk. I will not reply to you guys, we really don't need investors with this type of behavior. Please stop spamming on this post...

So far you're the one spamming it with off-topic whining about "people" you don't like. Please start answering on-topic questions about the coin you are promoting.

On the other hand, if you need investors with a certain type of behavior please specify - in full detail - what that entails.

[vancefox]

ah asking vital questions and trying to verify your patent claim is spamming. i get you
blind faith is required with this coin

It's like an ancestry tree.  It unfortunately seems like anything that is spun from GAW requires absolute blind faith and no common sense... none... zero.

Oh boy, this is a great idea is met with "thank you" and "invest now because it'll always be above $2 soon"

Explain to me the premise, or business model, behind this coin that's claimed to be backed by an incorporated company (LLC) is met with "FUD!!!!"

The owner/founder of this company was already shown to be shady and "scammy" so how is this different? is met with "the past is the past, I feel sorry for anyone trying to do good in cryptocurrency"

[vancefox]

Users who bought coins will not sell for less than what they paid.

Are you aware of the other part of the market price equation, i.e. the demand? How is the demand going to be created for the price to stay above $2? Please explain in full detail.

Also please explain what would happen to the staking proceeds (the 5%, 15% or 25% mentioned in your thread title). Since users don't pay for those coins according to your statement they can sell it as low as they want. What will that do to the price?

Well when you control the entire market and entire coin supply by keeping the free market out of it you can sell for $20 and buy for $2.  No supply or demand needed.  It won't work for very long but I'm sure there are at least a few gawlets out there...

Oh and apparently there is no blockchain explorer.  So you can't see anything.  Closed source coin and no explorer...

https://btclendtalk.org/topic/817/lendcoin-blockchain/30

11 days ago:

@skyecraft is working on this, and it is a priority.

And the thread is closed/locked.  How dare people ask to see what's going on behind the curtain of Carmelo.

[vancefox]

I correct my previous post.  Apparenly Carmelo wants to have his lendcoin on the exchanges:

https://btclendtalk.org/topic/964/lets-get-to-public-exchanges

3 days ago:

Lets get to public exchanges! Spread the word!

and our very own child of Carmelo:

The more people contacting exchanges for LendCoin, the better we do…

And just today:

The most profitable people at BTCLend are its customer. FACT
All Profits made at BTCLend goes towards paying for Development, Support and new features. FACT

The fact is that most of the Votes at cryptsy have been from us. We will keep voting as much as we can. Like I said, BTCLend has a lot of responsibilities and bills to keep BTCLend running.

Lendcoin on the other hand was built as a way to replace XPY as collateral, Build an AML compliant and secured wallet, and try to help out customers recover from XPY losses. (already occurring since we honor XPY at 200% of its value, I didn’t see anyone else doing that.)
Lendcoin is now in the hands of BTCLend customers and the community. It is now for ALL to contribute BTC if you can, efforts if you can. Any way we are capable of helping.

I would like to add that a lot of our community members are helping a lot. I appreciate that a whole lot.

Anyways, your feedback is always appreciated, but thinking that BTCLend is responsible of carrying all of the efforts for the success of LNC is very far from the truth. LNC belongs to all and its success will benefit, guess who? All of LNC holders.

Now this is something to talk about...  Getting a closed source coin with a locked, unless approved by management, wallet onto the free market...

[Yucayeque]

Life is great!

[kken01]

great answer

please read carefully what bittrex told you. its not the volume of posts here that get you there  concentrate on quality

[suchmoon]

Now this is something to talk about...  Getting a closed source coin with a locked, unless approved by management, wallet onto the free market...

Cryptsy might take it. They love XPY, they might like an XPY clone too

But any sane exchange that doesn't employ a CTO predisposed to cupping Garza's balls would probably stay away from a  wallet that sends private keys to GAW's spin-off scam (and possibly contains other nastiness too).

[kken01]

i doubt any exchange in the history of cryptocurrency has accepted closed source wallet. decompiling and making sure the wallet is secure would take too much resources. this coin will stay on its own exchange for ever, another failure for cmilian.... well thats only like 10th attempt for a product? 

cmilian, you have talents in taking pics of half naked women. maybe stick with that unless you are ready to discuss the merits of your "currency"

[RoomBot]

Y U FUD? 

I am the Great See Million and I teach my son to be fluent in the Garza-Speak!

[BTCPool.Exchange]

This so so smells like xpy/gaw/gaza , so so much!!

[RoomBot]

This so so smells like xpy/gaw/gaza , so so much!!

It's Deja Scammed all over again!   

Wow!  Check out See Million's shiny new gig, hahaha: 

http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=AAMAAAB57cIBc3WBQzHxEWeMsdmLIJIpZ5khmyk&authType=name&authToken=Sghr&trk=hp-props-feed-member-name&sl=NPU_JC%3B1614806921443995241842%3B-1%3Bactivity%3A6054673074144436224%3B30%3B0%3B

CEO / Entrepreneur / Coining

[bit1]

Very suspicious, Very low activity of dev, Closed source wallet, Own exchange.

RIP

[suchmoon]

Users who bought coins will not sell for less than what they paid.

How's that working out for you so far?

[vancefox]

Users who bought coins will not sell for less than what they paid.

How's that working out for you so far?

Looks like it worked exactly as father and son designed... to scam the scammed out of whatever they had left after their last scam(s)...