Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 04:12:39 AM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
News
: Latest Bitcoin Core release:
27.0
[
Torrent
]
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
More
Bitcoin Forum
>
Bitcoin
>
Development & Technical Discussion
>
New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
Pages:
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
[
11
]
12
13
14
»
All
« previous topic
next topic »
Print
Author
Topic: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest? (Read 41215 times)
Zombier0
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 435
Merit: 250
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 11, 2015, 06:16:15 PM
#201
This attack wont stop
✔ FAST EXCHANGE ✔ OVER
350 COINS
✔ MULTICOIN
DICE
✔
FREE COINS EVERY 24 HRS!
Yo
Bit
.net
▮
▮
▮
▮
▮
Play DICE! Win 1-5 btc just for 5 mins!
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a SourceForge forum.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714536759
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1714536759
Ignore
1714536759
1714536759
#2
1714536759
Report to moderator
1714536759
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1714536759
Ignore
1714536759
1714536759
#2
1714536759
Report to moderator
yakuza699
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 935
Merit: 1002
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 11, 2015, 06:43:13 PM
#202
Quote from: Zombier0 on October 11, 2015, 06:16:15 PM
This attack wont stop
Unless miners start to ignore High-s.
▄▄▄▄
▄▄▄▄
▄▄▄
▄▄▄
▄▄
▄▄
▄
▄
【
BTC
】
BitDice.me
.
Simple
and
Fast
1% Dice
Invest - Play - Join The Family
Zombier0
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 435
Merit: 250
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 11, 2015, 07:09:23 PM
#203
Quote from: yakuza699 on October 11, 2015, 06:43:13 PM
Quote from: Zombier0 on October 11, 2015, 06:16:15 PM
This attack wont stop
Unless miners start to ignore High-s.
They are not skilld enough
✔ FAST EXCHANGE ✔ OVER
350 COINS
✔ MULTICOIN
DICE
✔
FREE COINS EVERY 24 HRS!
Yo
Bit
.net
▮
▮
▮
▮
▮
Play DICE! Win 1-5 btc just for 5 mins!
tl121
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 278
Merit: 251
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 11, 2015, 07:12:13 PM
#204
Quote from: coins101 on October 11, 2015, 04:38:18 PM
This has been bugging me. I've read elsewhere about the real cost of sending transactions on the Bitcoin network being much, much higher than the banking or Visa network.
The cost per bitcoin transaction includes the cost of running the full nodes. This includes the nodes that forward the unconfirmed transaction to the node that eventually mines the tranaction, the full node that eventually mines the transaction, and the other full nodes that verify and store the block containing mined transaction.
Assuming the software were 100% efficient, this would, at least include the cost of transmitting the transaction to each node, the cost of verifying the transaction and the cost of storing the transaction. (In practice there are additional costs and overheads, but these are the essentials based on the design of bitcoin which requires all full nodes to receive and verify the entire block chain. Most of the extra overheads can, at least potentially, be avoided by clever software design.)
A transaction has an average of two digital signatures to be verified (most of the processing) and 500 bytes of data to be received (and on average transmitted) and stored. The costs can be worked out, but will depend on the users location. Some (SWAG) figures for bandwidth cost and storage cost are $0.10 per GB. You can do your own math and figure out how much it costs a node to process an average bitcoin transaction. This has to be multiplied by the number of nodes in the network (or the number of nodes that you think are useful to have in the network).
The cost of mining is a fixed cost of running the network. It remains constant regardless of the number of transactions that are in the blocks being mined. This is the cost of protecting the value of the bitcoins held by the private key holders. It is not the cost of processing transactions.
BitNow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1003
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 11, 2015, 07:17:48 PM
#205
Can somebody explains in a simple sentence (subject + verb + object) what's the problem with this attack, besides that can be a possible duplicate for your transaction
that never gets accepted by the Blockchain
and gets deleted by the Blockchain after 1 week (estimated time)?
▐█████▄
▐█████████
▄▄▄
▐████ ▐█████
▀▀▀ █▌
▐███ ▐███████
▐█▌
▐██▌ ▀█████▀
▐█▀
▂▄▄
▐██▌ ▀▀▀
▐█▌
▐██████████████▄▄▄▄▄
▄█▌
▐███
▐███▀
▀█████▄▄▄
▐██
▐█▌
▐███
▀▀▀███████▄▄▄
▀▀▀
▐███
▐██
▀█████▄▄
▐███
▐██▌
▀▀███▄▄
▐███
▐██▌
▄▄▄▄▄ ███▄
▄████▄
▐██▌
▐███
▐███████████
▐████████▌
▐██▌
▐██▌
▐████████▀▀
▀██████▀
▐██
██▀
▀████▀
▐███▀ ▄█
▐███
▐███▀ ▄████▌
▀███
▐██████████▀
▐█▌ █
▀████▀▀
▐█▌ ██
▀▀▀▀
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
WorldGames24
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▶
TELEGRAM
▶
BITCOINTALK
tl121
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 278
Merit: 251
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 11, 2015, 07:48:48 PM
#206
Quote from: BitNow on October 11, 2015, 07:17:48 PM
Can somebody explains in a simple sentence (subject + verb + object) what's the problem with this attack, besides that can be a possible duplicate for your transaction
that never gets accepted by the Blockchain
and gets deleted by the Blockchain after 1 week (estimated time)?
There are two problems:
1. Some wallets get confused should they send a transaction that gets changed by the attack, giving wrong status information to the user.
2. The attacker can increase the size of the memory pool of unconfirmed transactions, which uses extra processing resources, memory resources and network bandwidth, potentially causing sluggish performance of the network and crashing weak nodes.
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 11, 2015, 07:58:00 PM
#207
Quote from: tl121 on October 11, 2015, 07:12:13 PM
Quote from: coins101 on October 11, 2015, 04:38:18 PM
This has been bugging me. I've read elsewhere about the real cost of sending transactions on the Bitcoin network being much, much higher than the banking or Visa network.
The cost per bitcoin transaction includes the cost of running the full nodes. This includes the nodes that forward the unconfirmed transaction to the node that eventually mines the tranaction, the full node that eventually mines the transaction, and the other full nodes that verify and store the block containing mined transaction.
Assuming the software were 100% efficient, this would, at least include the cost of transmitting the transaction to each node, the cost of verifying the transaction and the cost of storing the transaction. (In practice there are additional costs and overheads, but these are the essentials based on the design of bitcoin which requires all full nodes to receive and verify the entire block chain. Most of the extra overheads can, at least potentially, be avoided by clever software design.)
A transaction has an average of two digital signatures to be verified (most of the processing) and 500 bytes of data to be received (and on average transmitted) and stored. The costs can be worked out, but will depend on the users location. Some (SWAG) figures for bandwidth cost and storage cost are $0.10 per GB. You can do your own math and figure out how much it costs a node to process an average bitcoin transaction. This has to be multiplied by the number of nodes in the network (or the number of nodes that you think are useful to have in the network).
The cost of mining is a fixed cost of running the network. It remains constant regardless of the number of transactions that are in the blocks being mined. This is the cost of protecting the value of the bitcoins held by the private key holders. It is not the cost of processing transactions.
6,000 nodes x $100/month hosting costs (which would be on the higher end), works out at $7m / year. Lets say 300,000 full nodes x $500/month each, that gets you to $1.8bn in full node costs. Add that to $3bn, no lets say $5bn in mining costs. You still get less than $10bn annual costs to operate the network vs. Visa costs of $18bn - $30bn, before taking into consideration MasterCard, banks costs, etc.
At mass payments scale, Bitcoin running its own decentralized back-ups / disaster recovery network is way more efficient.
BitNow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1003
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 11, 2015, 08:41:44 PM
#208
Quote from: tl121 on October 11, 2015, 07:48:48 PM
Quote from: BitNow on October 11, 2015, 07:17:48 PM
Can somebody explains in a simple sentence (subject + verb + object) what's the problem with this attack, besides that can be a possible duplicate for your transaction
that never gets accepted by the Blockchain
and gets deleted by the Blockchain after 1 week (estimated time)?
There are two problems:
1. Some wallets get confused should they send a transaction that gets changed by the attack, giving wrong status information to the user.
2. The attacker can increase the size of the memory pool of unconfirmed transactions, which uses extra processing resources, memory resources and network bandwidth, potentially causing sluggish performance of the network and crashing weak nodes.
So:
only the weak will suffer
.
Thank You for your reply.
Best regards.
▐█████▄
▐█████████
▄▄▄
▐████ ▐█████
▀▀▀ █▌
▐███ ▐███████
▐█▌
▐██▌ ▀█████▀
▐█▀
▂▄▄
▐██▌ ▀▀▀
▐█▌
▐██████████████▄▄▄▄▄
▄█▌
▐███
▐███▀
▀█████▄▄▄
▐██
▐█▌
▐███
▀▀▀███████▄▄▄
▀▀▀
▐███
▐██
▀█████▄▄
▐███
▐██▌
▀▀███▄▄
▐███
▐██▌
▄▄▄▄▄ ███▄
▄████▄
▐██▌
▐███
▐███████████
▐████████▌
▐██▌
▐██▌
▐████████▀▀
▀██████▀
▐██
██▀
▀████▀
▐███▀ ▄█
▐███
▐███▀ ▄████▌
▀███
▐██████████▀
▐█▌ █
▀████▀▀
▐█▌ ██
▀▀▀▀
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
WorldGames24
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▶
TELEGRAM
▶
BITCOINTALK
yakuza699
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 935
Merit: 1002
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 11, 2015, 09:35:37 PM
#209
Quote from: Zombier0 on October 11, 2015, 07:09:23 PM
Quote from: yakuza699 on October 11, 2015, 06:43:13 PM
Quote from: Zombier0 on October 11, 2015, 06:16:15 PM
This attack wont stop
Unless miners start to ignore High-s.
They are not skilld enough
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6769
▄▄▄▄
▄▄▄▄
▄▄▄
▄▄▄
▄▄
▄▄
▄
▄
【
BTC
】
BitDice.me
.
Simple
and
Fast
1% Dice
Invest - Play - Join The Family
mikeymillie
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 370
Merit: 250
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 11, 2015, 11:11:13 PM
#210
Quote from: BitNow on October 11, 2015, 08:41:44 PM
Quote from: tl121 on October 11, 2015, 07:48:48 PM
Quote from: BitNow on October 11, 2015, 07:17:48 PM
Can somebody explains in a simple sentence (subject + verb + object) what's the problem with this attack, besides that can be a possible duplicate for your transaction
that never gets accepted by the Blockchain
and gets deleted by the Blockchain after 1 week (estimated time)?
There are two problems:
1. Some wallets get confused should they send a transaction that gets changed by the attack, giving wrong status information to the user.
2. The attacker can increase the size of the memory pool of unconfirmed transactions, which uses extra processing resources, memory resources and network bandwidth, potentially causing sluggish performance of the network and crashing weak nodes.
So:
only the weak will suffer
.
Thank You for your reply.
Best regards.
>
only the weak will suffer
.
BitNow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1003
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 11, 2015, 11:36:07 PM
#211
Quote from: mikeymillie on October 11, 2015, 11:11:13 PM
>
only the weak will suffer
.
I don't understand: how the weak suffering has something to do with centralization?
Thank You and Best regards.
▐█████▄
▐█████████
▄▄▄
▐████ ▐█████
▀▀▀ █▌
▐███ ▐███████
▐█▌
▐██▌ ▀█████▀
▐█▀
▂▄▄
▐██▌ ▀▀▀
▐█▌
▐██████████████▄▄▄▄▄
▄█▌
▐███
▐███▀
▀█████▄▄▄
▐██
▐█▌
▐███
▀▀▀███████▄▄▄
▀▀▀
▐███
▐██
▀█████▄▄
▐███
▐██▌
▀▀███▄▄
▐███
▐██▌
▄▄▄▄▄ ███▄
▄████▄
▐██▌
▐███
▐███████████
▐████████▌
▐██▌
▐██▌
▐████████▀▀
▀██████▀
▐██
██▀
▀████▀
▐███▀ ▄█
▐███
▐███▀ ▄████▌
▀███
▐██████████▀
▐█▌ █
▀████▀▀
▐█▌ ██
▀▀▀▀
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
WorldGames24
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▶
TELEGRAM
▶
BITCOINTALK
mikeymillie
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 370
Merit: 250
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 11, 2015, 11:50:11 PM
#212
Quote from: BitNow on October 11, 2015, 11:36:07 PM
Quote from: mikeymillie on October 11, 2015, 11:11:13 PM
>
only the weak will suffer
.
I don't understand: how the weak suffering has something to do with centralization?
Thank You and Best regards.
When you suppress the agency of the weakest members of a group, they either forfeit their ability to contribute to it (a.k.a. they leave) or else delegate it to those slightly stronger.
This next slightly stronger group is now the new "weakest" and the cycle continues.
The result is that strength of the entire group becomes increasingly concentrated toward a center (or centers, in a multimodal distribution) of mass.
BitNow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1003
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 12, 2015, 12:02:47 AM
#213
OT
Quote from: mikeymillie on October 11, 2015, 11:50:11 PM
When you suppress the agency of the weakest members of a group, they either forfeit their ability to contribute to it (a.k.a. they leave) or else delegate it to those slightly stronger.
This next slightly stronger group is now the new "weakest" and the cycle continues.
The result is that strength of the entire group becomes increasingly concentrated toward a center (or centers, in a multimodal distribution) of mass.
Are we the new strongest?
Do you have something in contrary of been one of the strongest?
Best regards.
/OT
▐█████▄
▐█████████
▄▄▄
▐████ ▐█████
▀▀▀ █▌
▐███ ▐███████
▐█▌
▐██▌ ▀█████▀
▐█▀
▂▄▄
▐██▌ ▀▀▀
▐█▌
▐██████████████▄▄▄▄▄
▄█▌
▐███
▐███▀
▀█████▄▄▄
▐██
▐█▌
▐███
▀▀▀███████▄▄▄
▀▀▀
▐███
▐██
▀█████▄▄
▐███
▐██▌
▀▀███▄▄
▐███
▐██▌
▄▄▄▄▄ ███▄
▄████▄
▐██▌
▐███
▐███████████
▐████████▌
▐██▌
▐██▌
▐████████▀▀
▀██████▀
▐██
██▀
▀████▀
▐███▀ ▄█
▐███
▐███▀ ▄████▌
▀███
▐██████████▀
▐█▌ █
▀████▀▀
▐█▌ ██
▀▀▀▀
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
WorldGames24
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▐
▶
TELEGRAM
▶
BITCOINTALK
Perlover
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 162
Merit: 109
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 12, 2015, 10:34:34 AM
Last edit: October 12, 2015, 10:56:05 AM by Perlover
#214
Quote from: tl121 on October 11, 2015, 07:48:48 PM
Quote from: BitNow on October 11, 2015, 07:17:48 PM
Can somebody explains in a simple sentence (subject + verb + object) what's the problem with this attack, besides that can be a possible duplicate for your transaction
that never gets accepted by the Blockchain
and gets deleted by the Blockchain after 1 week (estimated time)?
There are two problems:
1. Some wallets get confused should they send a transaction that gets changed by the attack, giving wrong status information to the user.
2. The attacker can increase the size of the memory pool of unconfirmed transactions, which uses extra processing resources, memory resources and network bandwidth, potentially causing sluggish performance of the network and crashing weak nodes.
I will tell more
I have Mycelium 2.5.2. It allows to spend from unconfirmed transactions (without this feature a user could not make a next transaction until a next block in blockchechain will be generated but user should have a right to spend a change al least for example from a previous payment without waiting)
But this attack has a biggest problem as you could think - now i cannot spend my money from HD account already 3 days because this attack affected my Mycelium wallet. How it happens:
I did Tx - A. After soon i did other Tx - B. The B uses inputs from Tx A. Both transactions were unconfirmed. But attacker rebroadcasted a changed new transaction - A'. And this transaction was confirmed! After refreshing in the Mycelium wallet the last one forgot about A and replaced it by A' Tx. But after i had the A', the B transaction which used inputs from my other Txs and from the A! But the A already doesn't exist because it was double-spended for blockchain! And the Tx B looks like normal transaction (not double-spend!) because it has input from A transaction (other hash) - there is original TxID and its Tx was forgotten. Miners and full nodes think that they have the B transaction but didn't get a the A yet (other inputs refere to valid Txs of course). And this transaction hangs in mempool already three days and i cannot use other inputs! As a result of this - i as user cannot use other bitcoins already some days. I tried to archive account in Mycelium, wait 1-2 days and activate account again - and this "zombie" B Tx restored again and holds other outputs of other Tx from spending because the B has them (i see it happens because the Mycelium company has own bitcoin blockchain explorer which remembers this B Tx long time).
I think it problem is not only of the Mycelium wallet software.
While malleability will be in current protocol and the BIP62 doesn't work yet - any atacker will be able to make many shit to other users with wallet software - in this case there will be only one way to use bitcoin: to make one transaction in wallet -> wait until confirmation -> doing next transaction... It is stupid and very not comfortable way of bitcoin using.
What do you think about this?
P.S. I am as an advanced user exported xpriv key in Electrum and after this made new transaction and did double-spend of other inputs which were blocked by B Tx... But should what do not-advanced user? He will think that bitcoin sucks and he lost a money...
Zyklon87
Member
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 12, 2015, 10:59:58 AM
#215
Quote from: Perlover on October 12, 2015, 10:34:34 AM
Quote from: tl121 on October 11, 2015, 07:48:48 PM
Quote from: BitNow on October 11, 2015, 07:17:48 PM
Can somebody explains in a simple sentence (subject + verb + object) what's the problem with this attack, besides that can be a possible duplicate for your transaction
that never gets accepted by the Blockchain
and gets deleted by the Blockchain after 1 week (estimated time)?
There are two problems:
1. Some wallets get confused should they send a transaction that gets changed by the attack, giving wrong status information to the user.
2. The attacker can increase the size of the memory pool of unconfirmed transactions, which uses extra processing resources, memory resources and network bandwidth, potentially causing sluggish performance of the network and crashing weak nodes.
I will tell more
I have Mycelium 2.5.2. It allows to spend from unconfirmed transactions (without this feature a user could not make a next transaction until a next block in blockchechain will be generated but user should have a right to spend a change al least for example from a previous payment without waiting)
But this attack has a biggest problem as you could think - now i cannot spend my money from HD account already 3 days because this attack affected my Mycelium wallet. How it happens:
I did Tx - A. After soon i did other Tx - B. The B uses inputs from Tx A. Both transactions were unconfirmed. But attacker rebroadcasted a changed new transaction - A'. And this transaction was confirmed! After refreshing in the Mycelium wallet the last one forgot about A and replaced it by A' Tx. But after i had the A', the B transaction which used inputs from my other Txs and from the A! But the A already doesn't exist because it was double-spended for blockchain! And the Tx B looks like normal transaction (not double-spend!) because it has input from A transaction (other hash) - there is original TxID and its Tx was forgotten. Miners and full nodes think that they have the B transaction but didn't get a the A yet (other inputs refere to valid Txs of course). And this transaction hangs in mempool already three days and i cannot use other inputs! As a result of this - i as user cannot use other bitcoins already some days. I tried to archive account in Mycelium, wait 1-2 days and activate account again - and this "zombie" B Tx restored again (i see it happens because the Mycelium company has own bitcoin blockchain explorer which remembers this B Tx long time).
I think it problem is not only of the Mycelium wallet software.
While malleability will be in current protocol and the BIP62 doesn't work yet - any atacker will be able to make many shit to other user with wallet software - in this case there only one way to use bitcoin: to make one transaction in wallet -> wait until confirmation -> doing next transaction... It is stupid and very not comfortable way of bitcoin using.
What do you think about this?
P.S. I am as an advanced user exported xpriv key in Electrum and after this made new transaction and did double-spend of other inputs which were blocked by B Tx... But should what do not-advanced user? He will think that bitcoin sucks and he lost a money...
I updated Mycelium to v2.5.3 and I couldn't make 3-4tx in a row without being confirmed last tx, then try to send others, here what error I get when I try to send 2nd tx without being confirmed first one
http://imgur.com/I7HDhQf
which is bullshit as my wallet was synced !
As far as I know you could make tx from Mycelium without being confirmed or make tx like as much as you want before first, second .. tx without being confirmed, but I think these changes are from v.2.5.3 and I think it's better for begginers to wait until this attack is over or BIP62 or whatever is implemented to fix this issue/attack.
amaclin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1019
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 12, 2015, 11:28:09 AM
#216
Quote from: Perlover on October 12, 2015, 10:34:34 AM
P.S. I am as an advanced user...
Quote from: Perlover on October 12, 2015, 10:34:34 AM
...there will be only one way to use bitcoin: to make one transaction in wallet -> wait until confirmation -> doing next transaction... It is stupid and very not comfortable way of bitcoin using.
What do you think about this?
I think that you are not advanced bitcoin user.
Perlover
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 162
Merit: 109
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 12, 2015, 11:31:30 AM
#217
Quote from: amaclin on October 12, 2015, 11:28:09 AM
I think that you are not advanced bitcoin user.
I think about you same too.
P.S. Do you have anything to talk about this problem not about me?
P.P.S. Ecть чтo пo дeлy cкaзaть, или нa личнocти бyдeм пepexoдить?
amaclin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1019
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 12, 2015, 11:55:25 AM
#218
Quote from: Perlover on October 12, 2015, 11:31:30 AM
I think about you same too.
P.S. Do you have anything to talk about this problem not about me?
What problem? Malleability? THIS IS NOT A PROBLEM.
Sorry. I know too little about bitcoin, malleability, etc. I am newbie. You are right. I am not advanced user. Thank you for notice it.
Perlover
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 162
Merit: 109
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 12, 2015, 12:02:40 PM
#219
Quote from: amaclin on October 12, 2015, 11:55:25 AM
What problem? Malleability? THIS IS NOT A PROBLEM.
It's problem for wallet software. Read above.
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1499
No I dont escrow anymore.
Re: New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
October 12, 2015, 12:10:17 PM
#220
Quote from: Zyklon87 on October 12, 2015, 10:59:58 AM
-snip-
I updated Mycelium to v2.5.3 and I couldn't make 3-4tx in a row without being confirmed last tx, then try to send others, here what error I get when I try to send 2nd tx without being confirmed first one
http://imgur.com/I7HDhQf
which is bullshit as my wallet was synced !
As far as I know you could make tx from Mycelium without being confirmed or make tx like as much as you want before first, second .. tx without being confirmed, but I think these changes are from v.2.5.3 and I think it's better for begginers to wait until this attack is over or BIP62 or whatever is implemented to fix this issue/attack.
If mycelium does not allow you do use unconfirmed change by default, it is fixed and the error you got was perfectly fine. Transactions always refer to other transactions via the ID, thus if the ID changes your 2nd TX becomes invalid. It points to a TX that lost a race for confirmation and is now invalid.
If you have several inputs available Mycelium might be able to use more than one confirmed input and thus can issue several TX without waiting for a confirmation.
Im not really here, its just your imagination.
Pages:
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
[
11
]
12
13
14
»
All
Print
Bitcoin Forum
>
Bitcoin
>
Development & Technical Discussion
>
New transaction malleability attack wave? Another stresstest?
« previous topic
next topic »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Bitcoin
-----------------------------
=> Bitcoin Discussion
===> Legal
===> Press
===> Meetups
===> Important Announcements
=> Development & Technical Discussion
===> Wallet software
=====> Electrum
=====> Bitcoin Wallet for Android
=====> BitcoinJ
=====> Armory
=====> Mycelium
=====> Hardware wallets
=> Mining
===> Mining support
===> Pools
===> Mining software (miners)
===> Hardware
=====> Group buys
===> Mining speculation
=> Bitcoin Technical Support
=> Project Development
-----------------------------
Economy
-----------------------------
=> Economics
===> Speculation
=> Marketplace
===> Goods
=====> Computer hardware
=====> Digital goods
=======> Invites & Accounts
=====> Collectibles
===> Services
===> Currency exchange
===> Gambling
=====> Games and rounds
=====> Investor-based games
=====> Gambling discussion
===> Lending
=====> Long-term offers
===> Securities
===> Auctions
===> Service Announcements
=====> Micro Earnings
===> Service Discussion
=====> Web Wallets
=====> Exchanges
=> Trading Discussion
===> Scam Accusations
===> Reputation
-----------------------------
Other
-----------------------------
=> Meta
===> New forum software
===> Bitcoin Wiki
=> Politics & Society
=> Beginners & Help
=> Off-topic
=> Serious discussion
===> Ivory Tower
=> Archival
===> Корзина
===> CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
===> Chinese students
===> Obsolete (buying)
===> Obsolete (selling)
===> MultiBit
-----------------------------
Alternate cryptocurrencies
-----------------------------
=> Altcoin Discussion
=> Announcements (Altcoins)
===> Tokens (Altcoins)
=> Mining (Altcoins)
===> Pools (Altcoins)
=> Marketplace (Altcoins)
===> Service Announcements (Altcoins)
===> Service Discussion (Altcoins)
===> Bounties (Altcoins)
=> Speculation (Altcoins)
-----------------------------
Local
-----------------------------
=> العربية (Arabic)
===> العملات البديلة (Altcoins)
=====> النقاشات
===> إستفسارات و أسئلة المبتدئين
===> التعدين
===> النقاشات الأخرى
===> منصات التبادل
=> Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
===> Marketplace (Bahasa Indonesia)
===> Mining (Bahasa Indonesia)
===> Altcoins (Bahasa Indonesia)
===> Trading dan Spekulasi
===> Ekonomi, Politik, dan Budaya
===> Topik Lainnya
=> Español (Spanish)
===> Mercado y Economía
=====> Servicios
=====> Trading y especulación
===> Hardware y Minería
===> Esquina Libre
===> Mercadillo
=====> Mexico
=====> Argentina
=====> España
=====> Centroamerica y Caribe
===> Primeros pasos y ayuda
===> Altcoins (criptomonedas alternativas)
=====> Minería de altcoins
=====> Servicios
=====> Tokens (Español)
=> 中文 (Chinese)
===> 跳蚤市场
===> 山寨币
===> 媒体
===> 挖矿
===> 离题万里
=> Hrvatski (Croatian)
===> Trgovina
===> Altcoins (Hrvatski)
=====> Announcements (Hrvatski)
===> Off-topic (Hrvatski)
=> Deutsch (German)
===> Anfänger und Hilfe
===> Mining (Deutsch)
===> Trading und Spekulation
===> Projektentwicklung
===> Off-Topic (Deutsch)
===> Treffen
===> Presse
===> Altcoins (Deutsch)
=====> Announcements (Deutsch)
===> Marktplatz
=====> Auktionen
=====> Suche
=====> Biete
=> Ελληνικά (Greek)
===> Αγορά
===> Mining Discussion (Ελληνικά)
===> Altcoins (Ελληνικά)
=====> Altcoin Announcements (Ελληνικά)
=====> Altcoin Mining (Ελληνικά)
=> עברית (Hebrew)
=> Français
===> Actualité et News
===> Débutants
===> Discussions générales et utilisation du Bitcoin
===> Mining et Hardware
===> Économie et spéculation
===> Place de marché
=====> Échanges
=====> Produits et services
=====> Petites annonces
===> Le Bitcoin et la loi
===> Wiki, documentation et traduction
===> Développement et technique
===> Vos sites et projets
===> Hors-sujet
===> Altcoins (Français)
=====> Annonces
=> India
===> Mining (India)
===> Marketplace (India)
===> Regional Languages (India)
===> Press & News from India
===> Alt Coins (India)
===> Buyer/ Seller Reputations (India)
===> Off-Topic (India)
=> Italiano (Italian)
===> Guide (Italiano)
===> Progetti
===> Discussioni avanzate e sviluppo
===> Trading, analisi e speculazione
===> Mercato
=====> Mercato valute
=====> Beni
=====> Servizi
=====> Esercizi commerciali
=====> Hardware/Mining (Italiano)
=====> Gambling (Italiano)
===> Accuse scam/truffe
===> Mining (Italiano)
===> Alt-Currencies (Italiano)
=====> Annunci
===> Raduni/Meeting (Italiano)
===> Crittografia e decentralizzazione
===> Off-Topic (Italiano)
=> 日本語 (Japanese)
===> アルトコイン
=> Nederlands (Dutch)
===> Markt
===> Gokken/lotterijen
===> Mining (Nederlands)
===> Beurzen
===> Alt Coins (Nederlands)
===> Off-topic (Nederlands)
===> Meetings (Nederlands)
=> Nigeria (Naija)
=> 한국어 (Korean)
===> 대체코인 Alt Coins (한국어)
=> Pilipinas
===> Altcoins (Pilipinas)
=====> Altcoin Announcements (Pilipinas)
===> Pamilihan
===> Others (Pilipinas)
=> Polski
===> Tablica ogłoszeń
===> Alternatywne kryptowaluty
=====> Nowe kryptowaluty i tokeny
=====> Tablica ogłoszeń (altcoiny)
=> Português (Portuguese)
===> Primeiros Passos (Iniciantes)
===> Economia & Mercado
===> Mineração em Geral
===> Desenvolvimento & Discussões Técnicas
===> Criptomoedas Alternativas
===> Brasil
===> Portugal
=> Русский (Russian)
===> Новички
===> Бизнес
=====> Барахолка
=====> Обменники
===> Идеи
===> Кодеры
===> Майнеры
===> Политика
===> Трейдеры
===> Альтернативные криптовалюты
=====> Токены
=====> Бayнти и aиpдpoпы
===> Хайпы
===> Работа
===> Разное
===> Oбcyждeниe Bitcoin
=====> Новости
=====> Юристы
=> Română (Romanian)
===> Anunturi importante
===> Offtopic
===> Market
=====> Discutii Servicii
===> Minerit
===> Tutoriale
===> Bine ai venit!
===> Presa
===> Altcoins (Monede Alternative)
=====> Anunturi Monede Alternative
=> Skandinavisk
=> Türkçe (Turkish)
===> Bitcoin Haberleri
===> Pazar Alanı
===> Madencilik
===> Ekonomi
===> Servisler
=====> Fonlar
===> Proje Geliştirme
===> Alternatif Kripto-Paralar
=====> Madencilik (Alternatif Kripto-Paralar)
=====> Duyurular (Alternatif Kripto-Paralar)
===> Konu Dışı
===> Yeni Başlayanlar & Yardım
===> Buluşmalar
=> Other languages/locations
Loading...