amaclin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1019
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 06, 2015, 04:31:01 PM |
|
Yes, i need those pubkeys from outputs & inputs, only uncompressed , no pay to hash160 or multisig , only the available known pubkeys, for example :
OK, I'll try to do it today. But why do you need only uncompressed? There are more compressed pubkeys 02xxxxx and 03xxxxx in blockchain If you can ( if its possible ) uncompress them it would be great! Public keys should not be converted! For example: public key for address 1JwSSubhmg6iPtRjtyqhUYYH7bZg3Lfy1T: 0478D430274F8C5EC1321338151E9F27F4C676A008BDF8638D07C0B6BE9AB35C71A1518063243ACD4DFE96B66E3F2EC8013C8E072CD09B3834A19F81F659CC3455 and compressed public key for address 1C7zdTfnkzmr13HfA2vNm5SJYRK6nEKyq8 0378D430274F8C5EC1321338151E9F27F4C676A008BDF8638D07C0B6BE9AB35C71 both these public keys (and addresses) are derived from one private key C4BBCB1FBEC99D65BF59D85C8CB62EE2DB963F0FE106F483D9AFA73BD4E39A8A
|
|
|
|
XaiZou (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 06, 2015, 05:57:03 PM |
|
Yes, i need those pubkeys from outputs & inputs, only uncompressed , no pay to hash160 or multisig , only the available known pubkeys, for example :
OK, I'll try to do it today. But why do you need only uncompressed? There are more compressed pubkeys 02xxxxx and 03xxxxx in blockchain If you can ( if its possible ) uncompress them it would be great! Public keys should not be converted! For example: public key for address 1JwSSubhmg6iPtRjtyqhUYYH7bZg3Lfy1T: 0478D430274F8C5EC1321338151E9F27F4C676A008BDF8638D07C0B6BE9AB35C71A1518063243ACD4DFE96B66E3F2EC8013C8E072CD09B3834A19F81F659CC3455 and compressed public key for address 1C7zdTfnkzmr13HfA2vNm5SJYRK6nEKyq8 0378D430274F8C5EC1321338151E9F27F4C676A008BDF8638D07C0B6BE9AB35C71 both these public keys (and addresses) are derived from one private key C4BBCB1FBEC99D65BF59D85C8CB62EE2DB963F0FE106F483D9AFA73BD4E39A8A oh yes, so i need both cmpr. and ucmpr. , no need for mutltisig. thanks
|
|
|
|
waldistons
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 06, 2015, 08:13:21 PM |
|
Using RPC approach will take you ~3-4 weeks. I'm currently farming just addresses used, my app is runing almost a week and i'm 5 days away to block 300000. (the newer the block, the more transactions in block)
|
|
|
|
XaiZou (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 06, 2015, 09:12:21 PM |
|
Using RPC approach will take you ~3-4 weeks. I'm currently farming just addresses used, my app is runing almost a week and i'm 5 days away to block 300000. (the newer the block, the more transactions in block)
You can use blockparser to dump all bitcoin addresses down to the last Satoshi + the 0 balance used addresses within 30 min.
|
|
|
|
waldistons
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2015, 07:57:12 AM |
|
Compute and print the balance for all keys ever used in a TX since the beginning of time (30 seconds) I call those 30 seconds bullshit and let me explain why: 1) current blockchain size is 43.5 GB (all blk*.dat files) 2) even keeping blockchain on ssd, most ssd disks have THEORETHICAL read speed 500 MB/s 3) let's assume they work with max theorethical speed: 500 MB/s * 30 seconds = 15 GB will be read UNLESS: a) code doesn't read whole blocks and parses only small part of block size b) raid of SSD disks, can give couple GB/S read speeds. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
XaiZou (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2015, 12:49:07 PM |
|
Compute and print the balance for all keys ever used in a TX since the beginning of time (30 seconds) I call those 30 seconds bullshit and let me explain why: 1) current blockchain size is 43.5 GB (all blk*.dat files) 2) even keeping blockchain on ssd, most ssd disks have THEORETHICAL read speed 500 MB/s 3) let's assume they work with max theorethical speed: 500 MB/s * 30 seconds = 15 GB will be read UNLESS: a) code doesn't read whole blocks and parses only small part of block size b) raid of SSD disks, can give couple GB/S read speeds. Please correct me if I'm wrong. who said 30 sec ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
waldistons
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2015, 05:41:47 PM |
|
Quote was from original readme file ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
XaiZou (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 07, 2015, 08:56:06 PM |
|
Quote was from original readme file ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) ah, that readme file is old i think. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
unhappyuser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 09, 2015, 05:42:02 PM Last edit: October 09, 2015, 05:55:29 PM by unhappyuser |
|
Oh, that one is not solved yet?... I can try make an another callback for znort blockparser, if this will be good for you.
|
|
|
|
XaiZou (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 09, 2015, 07:58:12 PM |
|
Oh, that one is not solved yet?... I can try make an another callback for znort blockparser, if this will be good for you.
Great, ill be waiting!
|
|
|
|
unhappyuser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 10, 2015, 10:25:18 AM |
|
Great, ill be waiting!
But, please... why you are not accepting a knightdk solution? Are you tried to use more RPC threads and point bitcoind to unresponsive proxy address? Maybe you can get better results.
|
|
|
|
XaiZou (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 10, 2015, 12:26:17 PM |
|
Great, ill be waiting!
But, please... why you are not accepting a knightdk solution? Are you tried to use more RPC threads and point bitcoind to unresponsive proxy address? Maybe you can get better results. Yes, im using rpcthreads=1000 and the connection is direct no proxy ( all localhost ) but it is very slow. Maybe you can play with blockparser rawdump.cpp , transaction scripts code is there. but need some cleanup from other unwanted things.
|
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 6819
Just writing some code
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 10, 2015, 03:34:06 PM |
|
Great, ill be waiting!
But, please... why you are not accepting a knightdk solution? Are you tried to use more RPC threads and point bitcoind to unresponsive proxy address? Maybe you can get better results. Yes, im using rpcthreads=1000 and the connection is direct no proxy ( all localhost ) but it is very slow. Maybe you can play with blockparser rawdump.cpp , transaction scripts code is there. but need some cleanup from other unwanted things. Yeah, I know my solution was very very slow. I will update it to do multiple threads and see if that works any faster. It was running on a single thread.
|
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3486
Merit: 6819
Just writing some code
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 10, 2015, 06:55:54 PM |
|
Here is another version of mine. It still requires txindex but this time it will do multithreading to hopefully run faster. usage: Tool which scrapes the entire blockchain for all of the pubkeys of all transactions Requires bitcoind (or Bitcoin Core with daemon enabled) and txindex=1 to be set in Bitcoin.conf Usage: pubkeyscraper <rpcuser> <rpcpassword> [threads] [rpcport] [rpcurl] <rpcuser> Required. User of the Bitcoin-RPC server set in bitcoin.conf <rpcpassword> Required. Password of the Bitcoin-RPC server set in bitcoin.conf [threads] Optional. Number of threads to run, should be the same as the number of rpcthreads of the Bitcoin-RPC server. Default 4. [rpcport] Optional. Port of the Bitcoin-RPC server set in bitcoin.conf. Default is 8332 [rpcurl] Optional. URL or IP address of Bitcoin-RPC server. Default is http://127.0.0.1 Download: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bxw3ip9QfNOUY3EwS0Z3RUxqanc/view?usp=sharing
|
|
|
|
btc_enigma
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2015, 04:44:57 AM |
|
I am writing a much faster version that reads blocks from disk ... using bitcoinabe and bitcointools. Please wait for my submission before releasing bounty
-Thanks
|
|
|
|
btc_enigma
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 11, 2015, 06:23:23 AM |
|
Here is the script https://github.com/shivaenigma/bitcoin-abeDirectly reads blocks from bitcoin data directory. Prints some debug information on console like current block hash and 'Found x public keys' . You can redirect stdout to /dev/null for speed up My bitcoin address to claim bounty is in my profile - Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
btc_enigma
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 13, 2015, 05:11:30 AM |
|
XaiZou have you tried to out the script ? Waiting for a response
|
|
|
|
btc_enigma
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 14, 2015, 06:11:19 AM |
|
Typical of a new member , announcing bounty and then disappearing ! Should have asked for an escrow . What a sham !
I will wait for a day ... else I will give XaiZou a negative trust and ask moderator to ban the userid
|
|
|
|
unhappyuser
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 14, 2015, 02:30:23 PM |
|
I think there is must be a rule where user at least must sign a message using private BTC address which contains enough funds for covering an announced bounty...
|
|
|
|
|