Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 08:56:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitmain  (Read 1757 times)
sloopy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 501


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=905210.msg


View Profile
October 30, 2015, 11:12:47 PM
 #21

Bitmain sold Sidehack a batch of chips they knew were going to be outdated shortly after the sale.
IMO just part and parcel of their "dump all the BM1384 gear we can, dump all the chips we can however, before we start selling this BM1385 chip-based stuff we just started building".

KNC has zero interest in home miners, they burnt themselves too often trying to deal with folks that actually expected specs and timeframes to be met - keeping their stuff for themselves avoids all that hassle, at a small cost in potential profits (and a MAJOR net profit gain in lack of lawsuits for non-performance and broken junk shipped etc.).

Avalon seems to have a competent design team - my only issue with them is they think they are Apple or Rolls and can price at a significant premium for perceived quality when the quality doesn't matter that much to a unit that will be obsolete in a year or two.

 What would be interesting is if someone with a large chunk of change decided to get into the market and hired Sidehack and Novak and a good semi design team (too bad they're way too small potatoes for Berkshire to get interested in)....


That would be great, but you probably already know how many times Sidehack has said they would never give up creative control, and knowing Sidehack even a little from a few posts, he probably isn't giving up much control of anything except with he and Novac.
Hey, could anyone blame them? If you are in a position to answer to yourself, a partner, and maybe a bank at times, why be in  any other position.

I'm confident there are many creative, talented, smart people working at Bitmain, and please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the founder also the driving engineer and wasn't there a recent interview where he stated he did most of the design work?

The S7 has been a solid performer for the most part. I do not mean to detract from anyone who has, is, or will be having issues, there have been some major complaints about heat sinks falling off. Well

In the S5+ guide, easily confirmed by posting a pic if it isn't laying around, but it clearly states to inspect the heat sinks prior to starting the unit. It did not say you could not dismantle the unit to check the heatsinks. I am talking about my S5+, not my S7s, but wouldn't it make more sense for most people to do that very thing?
IT is so minor to slide the boards out and do a light look over the heatsinks.
Are people going to swap boards between units?

If so, how were S5+ owners supposed to comply with SOP re: warranty compliance?

I think that is where people need to use common sense and make a choice, but do not turn the unit on with a loose heatsink.

I'm not telling anyone what to do, I am commenting in this thread regarding the topic of Bitmain, but wanted to throw that out there.

 

Transaction fees go to the pools and the pools decide to pay them to the miners. Anything else, including off-chain solutions are stealing and not the way Bitcoin was intended to function.
Make the block size set by the pool. Pool = miners and they get the choice.
1715633794
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715633794

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715633794
Reply with quote  #2

1715633794
Report to moderator
1715633794
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715633794

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715633794
Reply with quote  #2

1715633794
Report to moderator
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715633794
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715633794

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715633794
Reply with quote  #2

1715633794
Report to moderator
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 12:25:50 AM
 #22

snip
If so, how were S5+ owners supposed to comply with SOP re: warranty compliance?

I did complety as I was scared to lose my warranty on a multi thousand dollar unit.  Normally in past my testing of a machine would include over and under clocking.... but I did not do it on S5+ as I thought losing warranty for it was not worth it.  I got lucky mine works great - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1157426.0

They honestly have gotten a lot tighter on warranty.  I can see from  a business standpoint why they want it.  But they just are not supporting modding in any way.
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7873


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
October 31, 2015, 04:39:41 AM
 #23

snip
If so, how were S5+ owners supposed to comply with SOP re: warranty compliance?

I did complety as I was scared to lose my warranty on a multi thousand dollar unit.  Normally in past my testing of a machine would include over and under clocking.... but I did not do it on S5+ as I thought losing warranty for it was not worth it.  I got lucky mine works great - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1157426.0

They honestly have gotten a lot tighter on warranty.  I can see from  a business standpoint why they want it.  But they just are not supporting modding in any way.

They are at their weakest with warranty.

It was never a good system to RMA a bitmiantech item.

Now it is harder.
If you buy one s-7 and the controller crashes it takes ten days for a replacement as they do not cross ship that part.
I have two s-7's  just to be able to have a spare controller.

And since the second one is a batch two most likely it may be firmware crippled to do only one machine.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 31, 2015, 04:47:29 AM
 #24

snip
If so, how were S5+ owners supposed to comply with SOP re: warranty compliance?

I did complety as I was scared to lose my warranty on a multi thousand dollar unit.  Normally in past my testing of a machine would include over and under clocking.... but I did not do it on S5+ as I thought losing warranty for it was not worth it.  I got lucky mine works great - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1157426.0

They honestly have gotten a lot tighter on warranty.  I can see from  a business standpoint why they want it.  But they just are not supporting modding in any way.

They are at their weakest with warranty.

It was never a good system to RMA a bitmiantech item.

Now it is harder.
If you buy one s-7 and the controller crashes it takes ten days for a replacement as they do not cross ship that part.
I have two s-7's  just to be able to have a spare controller.

And since the second one is a batch two most likely it may be firmware crippled to do only one machine.

I would definitely follow the warranty to the letter on any new bitmain gear.  Only ones I see different are antrouter and U3.... as they dont cost much.  The other ones like S7 currently I would want that warranty every single day of the 90's.   After... sure you can mod it. 

But allowing miner to work for 90 day's testing to make sure it's not a dud.... i think is pretty important at this point.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!