Known alts of anyone: User generated

[Lutpin]

screenshots cant be searched. get the people to delete their posts so you guys have some in a row

That's one of the point's why I am against this solution aswell. I prefer a more direct, more usable and more clean solution.

Nonetheless I'll PM the guys who had the first few posts, before me

Made an archive of the first page -> https://archive.is/aNwsh
Some of the posts are used as reference, they have been replaced with archive links here -> http://pastebin.com/k3ay0qtk

How will he create a post in between even after deleting the first reply?

The idea is that the users delete all their replies up to mexxer-2s first reply. That would be Quickseller, shorena, Athertle, james.lent and Kanapka deleting their first posts.

A new child board under reputation would be better: Alt accounts

Don't think we need a child board for this, just a better organized thread. Maybe more than one for the future, right now one thread is enough.

It would be better to start a new thread and make 3-4 posts reserved wither by you or mexxer-2.
Afterwards it will just get filled up.

At some point, this will be the only solution (besides not including some alts/keeping the list to a limit, but I don't support that).
For now, we're both trying to stall this step as long as possible.

[shorena]

screenshots cant be searched. get the people to delete their posts so you guys have some in a row

That's one of the point's why I am against this solution aswell. I prefer a more direct, more usable and more clean solution.

Nonetheless I'll PM the guys who had the first few posts, before me

Made an archive of the first page -> https://archive.is/aNwsh
Some of the posts are used as reference, they have been replaced with archive links here -> http://pastebin.com/k3ay0qtk

How will he create a post in between even after deleting the first reply?

The idea is that the users delete all their replies up to mexxer-2s first reply. That would be Quickseller, shorena, Athertle, james.lent and Kanapka deleting their first posts.

A new child board under reputation would be better: Alt accounts

Don't think we need a child board for this, just a better organized thread. Maybe more than one for the future, right now one thread is enough.

It would be better to start a new thread and make 3-4 posts reserved wither by you or mexxer-2.
Afterwards it will just get filled up.

At some point, this will be the only solution (besides not including some alts/keeping the list to a limit, but I don't support that).
For now, we're both trying to stall this step as long as possible.

I removed mine, did you try contacting Cyrus[1]? They might be willing to remove the posts, this post is the sections sticky after all.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=78147

[whywefight]

i think restart and reserve like 10 posts+ will help

[DarkStar_]

want to see my new awsomeness

Well, I might aswell explain the situation here, since we're currently looking for a solution.
It seems like the table has reached its maximum. I can neither add a new line to it, nor add a second table below. In both cases, we are getting a BBCode error.
My current ideas are: Either the posts below OP until the first post by mexxer get deleted by those users and we continue the table in the first reply.
Or we continue the table elswhere and just link it in OP/post a screenshot in OP.
I guess both, mexxer and I, don't want to start the thread from 0 again (what would be the third option).

I tried cutting unnecessary lines and obsolete whitespaces from OP, but it didn't help anything.
If any of you got some input, feel free to suggest any other option.

screenshots cant be searched. get the people to delete their posts so you guys have some in a row

You could make a spreadsheet, add screenshots in this thread and link the spreadsheet. Direct forum viewing will work, or they can go to google slides for a searchable version.

[Timelord2067]

Accounts connected: titibach, emileen,
Proof: In summary, I believe titibach is an Alt of emileen as outlined here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1354680.msg13791298#msg13791298
Addresses:

Code:

1EtopUP4eSqRMRk2KUXDecocMHK8Qnw2vu

Miscellaneous: It's like shooting fish in a barrel today...

[Shield]

@timelord

its good you are helping forum to find alt accounts of users but why you giving them negative too, forum rules allow having multiple accounts so I think you should give negative to only users whos alt is proven scammer not to everyone.

[Timelord2067]

Now I know why some of these outted Alts are getting so tetchy the last few days...

New rules since Dec, 17 2014

- We pay 0.0007 BTC per post (max 0.035/week).
- Users allowed:Full Member, Senior Member, Hero Member, Legendary Member, Staff
- No minimum weekly posts

Rules
- You must have no negative feedback points
- Only constructive posts! If majority of the posts is in off-topic sections, bump, spam, few words, picture - you will be banned forever.
- No other signatures are allowed at the same time.
- Must post in multiple sections of the forum during a whole week. We will ban forever 50 posts-one-day posters.

- We don't pay for posts less than 75 symbols length.
- We don't pay for posts in Off-topic / Games and rounds / Alternate cryptocurrencies / Indonesian and this thread.

-snip-(blah)-snip-

I'm guessing other signature campaigns have similar stipulations...     

  (Hurt em in the hip pocket)   

[Timelord2067]

@timelord2067

its good you are helping forum to find alt accounts of users but why you giving them negative too, forum rules allow having multiple accounts so I think you should give negative to only users whos alt is proven scammer not to everyone.

Hi and thanks for your question:

My negative trust applies where I believe there is an attempt to profit from claiming multiple times in signature campaigns by users who are barely complying with the stipulations and otherwise posting unnecessarily in threads with nonsensical posts.

I am not on the Default Trust, so I am the only one who can see the negative score on the left hand side.

*edit* It's Timelord2067 - there are other users here (albeit not active) who have the name Timelord in their name.

2nd edit - I have left Neutral trust for Alts in the past.

[Jhanzo]

you are not on DT so your feedback won't prevent them from being accepted on any sig campaign except betcoin.ag...

well true they won't be able to use multiple account on a single campaign. but not because they have negative feedback from you.

[Timelord2067]

you are not on DT so your feedback won't prevent them from being accepted on any sig campaign except betcoin.ag...

Fair enough, so my negative trust doesn't affect them at all then.

[Timelord2067]

you are not on DT so your feedback won't prevent them from being accepted on any sig campaign except betcoin.ag...

well true they won't be able to use multiple account on a single campaign. but not because they have negative feedback from you.

You edited your message after I replied.

With any luck, the organisers of Signature Campaigns will browse their trust and see my flag.

[yahoo62278]

you are not on DT so your feedback won't prevent them from being accepted on any sig campaign except betcoin.ag...

well true they won't be able to use multiple account on a single campaign. but not because they have negative feedback from you.

You edited your message after I replied.

With any luck, the organisers of Signature Campaigns will browse their trust and see my flag.

Im always browsing this thread when i open new campaigns for businesses. Very helpful information and in some cases saves me the trouble of hunting down alts via blockchain transactions

[Timelord2067]

you are not on DT so your feedback won't prevent them from being accepted on any sig campaign except betcoin.ag...

well true they won't be able to use multiple account on a single campaign. but not because they have negative feedback from you.

You edited your message after I replied.

With any luck, the organisers of Signature Campaigns will browse their trust and see my flag.

Im always browsing this thread when i open new campaigns for businesses. Very helpful information and in some cases saves me the trouble of hunting down alts via blockchain transactions

I appreciate your kind words - would you prefer to see negative or neutral trust given to confirmed Alts?

[Indianacoin]

Yes! I do agree with Timmylord!
The one having several alt accounts will silently benefit from joining different campaigns and there will be no slot left for us to join

Although account sales are allowed but the account holders should not participate in campaigns with all his alts.
Rather they should use it for collateral if they are in urgent need for loans.

[Timelord2067]

Accounts connected: titibach, emileen,
Proof: In summary, I believe titibach is an Alt of emileen as outlined here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1354680.msg13791298#msg13791298
Addresses:

Code:

1EtopUP4eSqRMRk2KUXDecocMHK8Qnw2vu

Miscellaneous: It's like shooting fish in a barrel today...

In summary, I believe titibach is an Alt of emileen

Yes emileen is my account and I buy this titibach to join signature campaign.I have sign address that I buy this account from someone if you want to see, not hack account.  Already about 1 month I use this account and I don't think my account worth 0.01 BTC for scam. I also have some post that use name emileen in this account if you check previous post of mine. You can see I never login emileen long time after get this account. My paypal is verified so don't worry   

[zazarb]

yes - it should be noted necessarily with negative feedback all alt, if at least one verified scammer.
no - no marking if the activity not suspicious, or not  related to financial transactions, defamation of another , feedback spammer.

[Mitchell]

Phibay/Laosai removed(ing) from the list as one of the accounts has been sold and is under someone else's control.

I'll help out as well, the known alts of Mitchełł are:
- QuickSeller
- BiPolarBob
- Lauda

Only way to do that is confirm from your alts

It was a joke and a reference to a post in which someone claimed that I owned those accounts.

[Joel_Jantsen]

Accounts connected: lastlove9091,

vpsmmoforall,

casinobonus

Proof: Address used by lastlove9091 here is the same address used by his alts here and here
Addresses:Common address :

Code:

13XXT6uGNwe93DQm8NEYVhwbAHPznLrRL9

Miscellaneous: Maybe we should lock this thread until a solution for updating all the pending records is found.

[Timelord2067]

Accounts connected: samantlia, morocco.man , ShakinHandz (and so on).
Proof: samantlia is actually an Alt of morocco.man
Addresses:

Code:

16hVYytEiPoDxYkRH2zcgeGLNHZZZg2z38
19RzeWx1UjbKcgjv2fkMU1qsiM7V9S78xt
13uxesmEnqdpTrMYNTrUvE2rBwaN9spKN2
16tqsyz3zh6v4PubWDyo5UzMARybDj9A8T

Miscellaneous: Some of the Alt's haven't been neg reped by anyone on the DT.

I also believe I can tie samantlia to ShakinHandz as being an Alts of each-other in a different way to previously listed.

[mexxer-2]

It was a joke and a reference to a post in which someone claimed that I owned those accounts.

Thats exactly what happens when I follow the "One emoji per post" rule, either that or my 'sarcasm factory' is coming up with incomprehensible products.

Miscellaneous: Maybe we should lock this thread until a solution for updating all the pending records is found.

I don't see why a lock might be necessary, the discussion can go on while we can track the first post that hasn't been updated in the OP. I believe Plan 1 might be a success, if 1) A moderator can help 2) Athertle comes back

BTW Mitch, is help from a moderator possible considering this is a stickied thread?