Known alts of anyone: User generated

[alani123]

Miscellaneous: Have left neutral feedback as there does not appear to be a scam involved.

I mean, the quote you included is him advertising an account cracking configuration. It's against the rules.

...and yet you haven't left any feedback to that effect on any of the three accounts.

Thanks for the advice.

This wasn't meant as an insult, merely an observation. I reported the thread so mods can act accordingly, this IMO is more appropriate in the occasion of someone breaking the forum rules. 

[1715101588]

1715101588

[1715101588]

1715101588

[1715101588]

1715101588

[noel57]

I need someone to audit my blockchain and btc-e bitcoin addresses, to proof if i am guilty as charge or i am actually innocent.
I will offer 0.005 btc for this job.
I have not scammed anyone and i do not deserve the negative trust because i have sold the account long time ago.
I shall remain guilty only if selling of account on this forum is now an offence.
Please PM me if you are capable of doing this and i will prefer a trust worthy forum member

[Joel_Jantsen]

I need someone to audit my blockchain and btc-e bitcoin addresses, to proof if i am guilty as charge or i am actually innocent.
I will offer 0.005 btc for this job.
I have not scammed anyone and i do not deserve the negative trust because i have sold the account long time ago.
I shall remain guilty only if selling of account on this forum is now an offence.
Please PM me if you are capable of doing this and i will prefer a trust worthy forum member

My dear two accounts from your wallet were already negative tagged including this one.Now you were saying you sold wealthy okay ,what about the other one ? Both were tagged for the same reason IE selling illegal goods.If you can produce proofs of these accounts being sold and they haven't used the same address as you did after selling them,I will somehow convince that the negative is removed.

[whywefight]

Still no update on awesomeness?

[mexxer-2]

Still no update on awesomeness?

Yeah, I'm pretty dependent on Lutpin when it comes to table updates . Damn you Lutpin for complicating the thread, even I could update the thread, when it was "Name: Proof link" stage. 

[Lutpin]

Yeah, I'm pretty dependent on Lutpin when it comes to table updates . Damn you Lutpin for complicating the thread, even I could update the thread, when it was "Name: Proof link" stage.  

Well, anybody could do that. Whilst the thread in it's current version is a little harder to upgrade/maintain, it also gives an additional value I wouldn't want to miss (compared to the easy listing you had before).
I'll be fully back next week, till then you have to get along as it is.

[Timelord2067]

Still no update on awesomeness?

No grasshopper, there is no update...

[noel57]

I need someone to audit my blockchain and btc-e bitcoin addresses, to proof if i am guilty as charge or i am actually innocent.
I will offer 0.005 btc for this job.
I have not scammed anyone and i do not deserve the negative trust because i have sold the account long time ago.
I shall remain guilty only if selling of account on this forum is now an offence.
Please PM me if you are capable of doing this and i will prefer a trust worthy forum member

My dear two accounts from your wallet were already negative tagged including this one.Now you were saying you sold wealthy okay ,what about the other one ? Both were tagged for the same reason IE selling illegal goods.If you can produce proofs of these accounts being sold and they haven't used the same address as you did after selling them,I will somehow convince that the negative is removed.

It is honestly a clear conscience that will submit his account for auditing.
Any address you claim to have done any with you will be seen from the addresses available and you can trace all the account connected to it and proof if i have frauded anybody or not.
I am not saying that i should not be punished if i have done something wrong but dont punish me wrongly.
I NEED A TRUSTED MEMBER TO AUDIT and proof if i am guilty or not.
Mitchell kindly remove the negative trust until i am proved to be guilty but for now you are punishing a wrong person.
I AM INNOCENT.

1PzosfjXHaQq7u5jC9YAeyd6bHA3UNrVy
1DuXLg2sDVdmQ5VFU8wzoqASvBtrG1s212   
1Axepx45vpTnQqxovUfuDngmgwnkPdQhpb   
16dAypFxuASWQj8Y6yrE2wM7C2xR5tekh3   
1PUWVomFAS9JYxPi1ZAYHT6NtrybdAixwe   
1GfuaAis2hQxEK8uk62vJWabALAYwJ4KL4   
1KswLM5woJRAYbVKC7JAhpJxdf2CcgkzGc   
19ZzF71YurFuGnUuBJtJ3JUfWNxZ9zkzjY   
1FXNEvU1TSZPq8vGCZWpAsFUwW6Snsh4cr

Which one among all the account listed collected any money fro you Joel_Jantsen?
Unless you have any other thing against me i do not deserve this negative trust.

[mexxer-2]

Which one among all the account listed collected any money fro you Joel_Jantsen?
Unless you have any other thing against me i do not deserve this negative trust.

You're making incomprehensible arguments, also, use one post instead of multiple posts when talking about the same topic.

[noel57]

Which one among all the account listed collected any money fro you Joel_Jantsen?
Unless you have any other thing against me i do not deserve this negative trust.

You're making incomprehensible arguments, also, use one post instead of multiple posts when talking about the same topic.

I am sorry about that but everybody will surely feel bad when they are wrongly accused.
incomprehensible arguments i dont know how to explain this better.

[Lutpin]

Which one among all the account listed collected any money fro you Joel_Jantsen?
Unless you have any other thing against me i do not deserve this negative trust.

First off, you do deserve the negative trust. I agree, and I also thing your currently untagged account should be negged also (melisandre).
Now to the thing at hand.
The account meadefreling uses the address 1PUWVomFAS9JYxPi1ZAYHT6NtrybdAixwe (courtesy of your wallet) up until 8 days ago:

Done
meadefreling
1PUWVomFAS9JYxPi1ZAYHT6NtrybdAixwe
I dont think this is allow here because it is a giveaway.

First time he's seen using it is 8 months ago in the DaDice signature campaign here.

Between that, he recieved negative trust from EcuaMobi for this thread.
Don't tell me that was not indeed your account back then, is it right now, and you were the one who created that thread.

I am sorry about that but everybody will surely feel bad when they are wrongly accused.
incomprehensible arguments i dont know how to explain this better.

You can't. But for starters, don't talk about "btc addresses auditor"s, instead start explaining your connection and lay things open for us to see.
If you don't, there's no reason at all to believe you one little bit.

[noel57]

Which one among all the account listed collected any money fro you Joel_Jantsen?
Unless you have any other thing against me i do not deserve this negative trust.

First off, you do deserve the negative trust. I agree, and I also thing your currently untagged account should be negged also (melisandre).
Now to the thing at hand.
The account meadefreling uses the address 1PUWVomFAS9JYxPi1ZAYHT6NtrybdAixwe (courtesy of your wallet) up until 8 days ago:

Done
meadefreling
1PUWVomFAS9JYxPi1ZAYHT6NtrybdAixwe
I dont think this is allow here because it is a giveaway.

First time he's seen using it is 8 months ago in the DaDice signature campaign here.

Between that, he recieved negative trust from EcuaMobi for this thread.
Don't tell me that was not indeed your account back then, is it right now, and you were the one who created that thread.

I am sorry about that but everybody will surely feel bad when they are wrongly accused.
incomprehensible arguments i dont know how to explain this better.

You can't. But for starters, don't talk about "btc addresses auditor"s, instead start explaining your connection and lay things open for us to see.
If you don't, there's no reason at all to believe you one little bit.

If he accuse me about meadefreling account i will not argue because it is my account but it does not rob anybody as well but i have nothing to do with wealthy$ account in truth.

[Lutpin]

If he accuse me about meadefreling account i will not argue because it is my account but it does not rob anybody as well but i have nothing to do with wealthy$ account in truth.

So, your only problem is, that we tied you to the wrong scammer?
I'm terribly actually not a bit sorry we connected you to the wrong scum red trust user. Now move on, you're red shining for a reason.

[noel57]

If he accuse me about meadefreling account i will not argue because it is my account but it does not rob anybody as well but i have nothing to do with wealthy$ account in truth.

So, your only problem is, that we tied you to the wrong scammer?
I'm terribly sorry we connected you to the wrong scum. Now move on, you're red for a reason.

Yes, that is my problem i dont like to be tag with scammer or anything that could spoil my personality.

[Lutpin]

Yes, that is my problem i dont like to be tag with scammer or anything that could spoil my personality.

You were selling an e-book teaching people how to gain/earn money with fraud!
What personality is left to spoil? You have reached rock bottom. Don't even try talking your way out of this.
Let me quote some feedbacks for you:

If you deal with him you will help to commit a crime and may get in legal issues. (~EcuaMobi)

Selling a method that almost certainly includes the commission of credit/debit card fraud, receiving and selling stolen property, and conspiracy thereof. (~TBZ)

Selling a "money making" method which is illegal and this user agrees it is illegal! (~Muhammed Zakir)

Now here's what you said minutes before:

I am sorry about that but everybody will surely feel bad when they are wrongly accused. -snip-

And then, you admit to be meadefreling:

If he accuse me about meadefreling account i will not argue because it is my account -snip-

Case closed.

[shorena]

Accounts connected: noel57, alwinlinzee, meadefreling melisande    wealthy$ and probably more..
Proof: All accounts are connected via this wallet https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/3326dbc8a3f81916/addresses
Addresses:

Code:

1PzosfjXHaQq7u5jC9YAeyd6bHA3UNrVy
1DuXLg2sDVdmQ5VFU8wzoqASvBtrG1s212	
1Axepx45vpTnQqxovUfuDngmgwnkPdQhpb	
16dAypFxuASWQj8Y6yrE2wM7C2xR5tekh3	
1PUWVomFAS9JYxPi1ZAYHT6NtrybdAixwe	
1GfuaAis2hQxEK8uk62vJWabALAYwJ4KL4	
1KswLM5woJRAYbVKC7JAhpJxdf2CcgkzGc	
19ZzF71YurFuGnUuBJtJ3JUfWNxZ9zkzjY	
1FXNEvU1TSZPq8vGCZWpAsFUwW6Snsh4cr	

Miscellaneous: Two Accounts are already negative rep'd.Messaged EquaMobi to neg the rest.
Following are the respective proofs :

I love this
Username - alwinlinzee   
Post - 87
Activity - 42   
position - Jr. Member
Btc - 1PzosfjXHaQq7u5jC9YAeyd6bHA3UNrVy3
Thanks

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1240368.msg12946137#msg12946137
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=877550.msg9696087#msg9696087

Archives :
 wealthy$
melisande
noel57

Just a heads up and explanation why I have not left the users in question a negative rating when you asked me to:

Connections like these are a pain in the ass to verify. It looks to me like you didnt verify it yourself, but just trusted walletexplorer. There is not a single TX posted connecting any of the address, the archives have been put into place days later when the profiles might have been changed. Please change this in the future.

The archive for wealthy$ is not available. I made one here -> https://archive.is/Cj9VQ

If he accuse me about meadefreling account i will not argue because it is my account but it does not rob anybody as well but i have nothing to do with wealthy$ account in truth.

So, your only problem is, that we tied you to the wrong scammer?
I'm terribly sorry we connected you to the wrong scum. Now move on, you're red for a reason.

Yes, that is my problem i dont like to be tag with scammer or anything that could spoil my personality.

#1 1GfuaAis2hQxEK8uk62vJWabALAYwJ4KL4 is the address used by wealthy$ [1]

#2 1DuXLg2sDVdmQ5VFU8wzoqASvBtrG1s212 is the address you posted Oct 31th 2014[2]

#3 Since #2 is wealthy$'s address so is 1PzosfjXHaQq7u5jC9YAeyd6bHA3UNrVy3 as they are both spend linked here[3]

#4 since #3 is wealthy$'s address so is 1DuXLg2sDVdmQ5VFU8wzoqASvBtrG1s212 as they are both spend linked here[4]

I hereby have linked you to someone that tried to scam by selling banned accounts, which should might get you banned btw, since you are possibly evading your ban. I cant say for sure because BadBear didnt post how long you had been banned.

-snip-
Typical sig spammer ban duration escalation is now 14 days, 60 days, permanent. If it's someone I truly feel just needs a warning it will be 7, 30, permanent. This needs to stop so I'm going to be much more aggressive. If 8t doesn't work there's only 2 options left, and neither are good.

I do not unban accounts because they were sold. Many accounts being sold are on their second or third offense.

OP and all his alts are banned.

You (@noel57) can send the 0.005 btc for this work to the address in my profile.

[1] https://archive.is/Cj9VQ
[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20160209084122/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=746016.msg9398156
[3] https://blockchain.info/tx/b912d9763a217cdd65b93cd2437a28ed40b4bf2f6745896725091f8fc2cd9732
[4] https://blockchain.info/tx/6b84aae89c66e03d1c11edd3dc88dd99888e192cd06e0b134488e427d0ae788f

[Lutpin]

Just a heads up and explanation why I have not left the users in question a negative rating when you asked me to:
Connections like these are a pain in the ass to verify. It looks to me like you didnt verify it yourself, but just trusted walletexplorer. There is not a single TX posted connecting any of the address, the archives have been put into place days later when the profiles might have been changed. Please change this in the future.

Yes, they are. And I actually have been just looking into it/formulating my post, you've beaten me to the task.

#1 1GfuaAis2hQxEK8uk62vJWabALAYwJ4KL4 is the address used by wealthy$ [1]
#2 1DuXLg2sDVdmQ5VFU8wzoqASvBtrG1s212 is the address you posted Oct 31th 2014[2]
#3 Since #2 is wealthy$'s address so is 1PzosfjXHaQq7u5jC9YAeyd6bHA3UNrVy3 as they are both spend linked here[3]
#4 since #3 is wealthy$'s address so is 1DuXLg2sDVdmQ5VFU8wzoqASvBtrG1s212 as they are both spend linked here[4]

I hereby have linked you to someone that tried to scam by selling banned accounts, which should get you banned btw, since you are evading your ban.

[1] https://archive.is/Cj9VQ
[2] https://web.archive.org/web/20160209084122/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=746016.msg9398156
[3] https://blockchain.info/tx/b912d9763a217cdd65b93cd2437a28ed40b4bf2f6745896725091f8fc2cd9732
[4] https://blockchain.info/tx/6b84aae89c66e03d1c11edd3dc88dd99888e192cd06e0b134488e427d0ae788f

Thanks for that.
Will be used as reference for the next update in OP by either mexxer-2 or me.


Again sorry for my ongoing inactivity considering verifications/updates.
Currently can only limit my activity to the very least, that will change next week, and I'll continue maintaining the thread together with mexxer-2 as in the first days I started helping him out.

[noel57]

At times we all finds it difficult to explains things, i never claimed not to create the account in question (wealthy$) but i claimed to have sold it and i wonder which part that you people cannot understand.
This is purely a wrong judgement and a crime against humanity because selling of account is allowed here.

[shorena]

At times we all finds it difficult to explains things, i never claimed not to create the account in question (wealthy$) but i claimed to have sold it and i wonder which part that you people cannot understand.
This is purely a wrong judgement and a crime against humanity because selling of account is allowed here.

I dont believe you. Do you have anything to back your claims?

[noel57]

At times we all finds it difficult to explains things, i never claimed not to create the account in question (wealthy$) but i claimed to have sold it and i wonder which part that you people cannot understand.
This is purely a wrong judgement and a crime against humanity because selling of account is allowed here.

I dont believe you. Do you have anything to back your claims?

Just tell me the type of proof you need and i will try to provide it.
But i am saying the truth and nothing but the truth.
I appreciate everybody that have contributed in making this forum a place to be and honestly i do not pick any offence as regards my negative trust.
I found a proof that i have sold 5 account to the scammer via my btc-e.com trading account on 26.02.15
16:54:04, he bought those account by send the fund one after the other and he bought each account @ +0.05479914 BTC each which wealthy$ was part of it.
I can upload the screen shot or allow any trusted member to access the account.
I am innocent.