Bitcoin Forum
May 14, 2024, 10:41:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: which bitcoin addresses have precedence, old or new  (Read 457 times)
silverleafy (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 538
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 12, 2015, 08:57:59 PM
 #1

If someone claimed their account was hacked or they forgot the password, and they posted a signed message from a bitcoin address from 2 years ago, but the current owner is able to post a signed message from 6 months ago, which one would take precedence and who would get the account, the guy with the old address or the guy with the newer address?

"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
zazarb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3374
Merit: 1548


Get loan in just five minutes goo.gl/8WMW6n


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2015, 09:41:28 PM
 #2

If someone claimed their account was hacked or they forgot the password, and they posted a signed message from a bitcoin address from 2 years ago, but the current owner is able to post a signed message from 6 months ago, which one would take precedence and who would get the account, the guy with the old address or the guy with the newer address?
precedence will first, just in case if  the second not have proof, that legally acquired this account from original owner.

       ███████████████▄▄
    ██████████████████████▄
  ██████████████████████████▄
 ███████   ▀████████▀   ████▄
██████████    █▀  ▀    ██████▄
███████████▄▄▀  ██  ▀▄▄████████
███████████          █████████
███████████▀▀▄  ██  ▄▀▀████████
██████████▀   ▀▄  ▄▀   ▀██████▀
 ███████  ▄██▄████▄█▄  █████▀
  ██████████████████████████▀
    ██████████████████████▀
       ███████████████▀▀
.
.Duelbits.
.
..THE MOST REWARDING CASINO......
   ▄▄▄▄████▀███▄▄▄▄▄
▄███▄▀▄██▄   ▄██▄▀▄███▄
████▄█▄███▄█▄███▄█▄████
███████████████████████   ▄██▄
██     ██     ██     ██   ▀██▀
██ ▀▀█ ██ ▀▀█ ██ ▀▀█ ██    ██
██  █  ██  █  ██  █  ██
█▌  ██
██     ██     ██     ████  ██
█████████████████████████  ██
████████████████████████████▀
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
████████████████████████▌
       +4,000      
PROVABLY FAIR
GAMES
   $500,000  
MONTHLY
PRIZE POOL
      $10,000     
BLACKJACK
GIVEAWAY
BadBear
v2.0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1127



View Profile WWW
October 12, 2015, 11:17:22 PM
 #3

It's a simple question that usually involves a complicated scenario. If that was all the information I had, and I had to make a decision based on only that, I would go with the older because statistically it has a slightly better chance of going to the proper owner.

It's rarely that simple though, and we generally have access to much more information than that.


1Kz25jm6pjNTaz8bFezEYUeBYfEtpjuKRG | PGP: B5797C4F

Tired of annoying signature ads? Ad block for signatures
silverleafy (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 538
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 12, 2015, 11:34:37 PM
 #4

It's a simple question that usually involves a complicated scenario. If that was all the information I had, and I had to make a decision based on only that, I would go with the older because statistically it has a slightly better chance of going to the proper owner.

It's rarely that simple though, and we generally have access to much more information than that.


Thanks, that helps. I was thinking along the lines of a loan of an account to someone and telling him to return it by some date but he never does.

BadBear
v2.0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1127



View Profile WWW
October 12, 2015, 11:45:32 PM
 #5

In that particular situation I wouldn't bother getting involved, it's a waste of my time. What would probably happen is you would have to open a scam accusation, and he would receive negative feedback if you could show he did not follow your agreement.


1Kz25jm6pjNTaz8bFezEYUeBYfEtpjuKRG | PGP: B5797C4F

Tired of annoying signature ads? Ad block for signatures
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!