Banned

[shorena]

-snip-
a maximum of 75 posts, I wrote a week and was not dependent on my signature or not, but certainly 100, though again there are people who write more than 100 posts with subscription companies and their banyat not specifically looked at a few people today,

The number of posts is not important. Whats important is whether your posts are constructive or not. There a lengthy discussions all over the board about what is constructive and what not, but there is little that matters in that regard. If the staff considers the majority of your posts unconstructive you will get a warning (short ban). Learn from this or you will get another warning (slightly longer ban). If you still did not get it, you are banned forever.

[1715198231]

1715198231

[1715198231]

1715198231

[1715198231]

1715198231

[jacee]

a maximum of 75 posts, I wrote a week and was not dependent on my signature or not, but certainly 100, though again there are people who write more than 100 posts with subscription companies and their banyat not specifically looked at a few people today,

Don't forget to consider the quality of posts. People get banned because of their crappy posts, by crappy it means the quality and the time they spend on posting here in this forum. Some signature spammers could care less about the quality of their posts just to reach the maximum number of posts to get all the coins from their campaign.

[xandry]

bla bla1 if you link to account most likely mods can give better answers.  Saying you were banned for same thing does not tell a lot.   No two peoples postings are the same (or should be).  So if you want a Mod to look into it provide more info.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=458761 vizito
Yes, posts shorts (but always on topic and useful). He is right partly, not hard to find in our (russian) section users that have a much worse posts history, but them banning. Not fast but banning. 
Also I always try to warn users before a ban that the user had a chance to improve posts.

[pjsonowal]

You are banned as Lauda has said , for signature spam. You were largely posting in Giveaway and Local thread just for increasing your post count. And seeing hilarious' opinion on secondstrade(and yobit) campaign, I wouldn't be surprised if more members from those campaign start getting banned.

Yup. Sadly there's probably going to be a lot of these threads popping up the next few days but these bannings are long overdue and the secondstrade/yobit campaigns can't continue as they have been. Hopefully people will take the warning or see these threads and improve before they get a time out.

Thnxx i got the answer why i get banned... To same case like this one however i unregistered my name from signature camapign.... So if someone continues posting low quality posts even if he/she is not a part of a signature campaign will he get ban??

[hilariousandco]

Very likely yes. Simply removing a signature does not excuse shitposting. People often farm accounts without a signature but they'll still get banned if they make poor quality posts.

[bla bla1]

bla bla1 if you link to account most likely mods can give better answers.  Saying you were banned for same thing does not tell a lot.   No two peoples postings are the same (or should be).  So if you want a Mod to look into it provide more info.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=458761 vizito
Yes, posts shorts (but always on topic and useful). He is right partly, not hard to find in our (russian) section users that have a much worse posts history, but them banning. Not fast but banning.  
Also I always try to warn users before a ban that the user had a chance to improve posts.

Yes this is my account,I think that not only in Russian topic there are people with the worst history of posts, but also in other local

[hilariousandco]

Report them then. Just because there are worse users doesn't make it ok and they might be in the process of being banned.