Who will win WW3?

[w40ut]

No one. The world will be destroyed.

[bryant.coleman]

Don't think that Russia will let its allies fall after the Ukrainian crisis.
Here they go to help Assad, maybe we will see Russian troops in those countries soon

Russia's resources are more limited, and they are facing a severe cash shortage following the crash in oil prices. IMO, the intervention in Syria might be a short-term strategy to strengthen Assad. After 3-4 months, the Russians will go back to Moscow, and Assad will be on his own. Unlike what the Americans have done in Iraq and Afghanistan, Russia doesn't have any long term plans for Syria.

[winguard]

If a world war III ever happened using nukes, no one would win. Everyone will loose.

[InvoKing]

Don't think that Russia will let its allies fall after the Ukrainian crisis.
Here they go to help Assad, maybe we will see Russian troops in those countries soon

Russia's resources are more limited, and they are facing a severe cash shortage following the crash in oil prices. IMO, the intervention in Syria might be a short-term strategy to strengthen Assad. After 3-4 months, the Russians will go back to Moscow, and Assad will be on his own. Unlike what the Americans have done in Iraq and Afghanistan, Russia doesn't have any long term plans for Syria.

Meh i forgot to precise in my post that the charge will be mostly paid by the country that will host them then it can be done 

[Losvienleg]

The Front National has really big chances to win, a lot more than Martine Aubry !

Marine Le Pen is likely to top the first round with 30% or even 35% of the vote. But it will be almost impossible for her to increase her support to the 50% mark in the second round. All the mainstream parties will team up, to make sure that she is defeated. 

USA will never invade Russia ! They're not even able to defeat terrorists groups, how could they invade one of the strongest military powers in the world ? Russia has also strong allies.

Obama will never invade Russia. But after his term?

Check these:

http://www.redstate.com/2015/10/02/hillary-clinton-advocates-war-russia/
http://www.alan.com/2015/10/12/christie-would-likely-start-a-war-with-russia/
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/10/marco-rubio-wants-us-to-risk-war-with-russia-over-syria/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/jeb-bush-russia-should-face-consequences-over-syria_561d989ce4b028dd7ea5aaa9?section=india&adsSiteOverride=in

I hated Hillary Clinton, but now I hate her a lot more. She's really dumb ! USA, at the apogee of their power didn't defeated Russia, how could they do it now ?

[Betwrong]

only planet earth will win.

You mean when there are no humans on Earth to harm it the planet will win? 

Yeah, I agree. And then the Earth will marry Pluto and they will live happily ever after. )

[pungopete468]

World War III won't happen the way you think it will. None of the major players would be willing to suffer a 100% casualty rate during offensives in a conventional war setting, and nukes are off the table. There won't be any nuclear war...

Humanity has literally outgrown World War, yet human nature longs for it like a heroine addict on a withdrawal.

Look up Project Blue Beam. This is your World War III, and NWO catalyst event. Worse, it's already time for the show... Just wait for it.

[bryant.coleman]

I hated Hillary Clinton, but now I hate her a lot more. She's really dumb ! USA, at the apogee of their power didn't defeated Russia, how could they do it now ?

She is not dumb. She is a warmonger and she is really cunning. She was the mastermind behind the bombing campaigns in Serbia, Bosnia, Kosovo and Libya. Other than the tens of thousands who lost their lives during the bombing campaigns, she has also directly murdered dozens of people (the most notable being Vince W. Foster), without getting prosecuted for any of these crimes.

[onemorexmr]

World War III won't happen the way you think it will. None of the major players would be willing to suffer a 100% casualty rate during offensives in a conventional war setting, and nukes are off the table. There won't be any nuclear war...

Humanity has literally outgrown World War, yet human nature longs for it like a heroine addict on a withdrawal.

Look up Project Blue Beam. This is your World War III, and NWO catalyst event. Worse, it's already time for the show... Just wait for it.

give it a few more years and people start to forget how bad war is.... they begin to start to think they can win it because of proud and patriotism (this makes them think they are so much better than there "dumb" opponent)...

then WW3 starts...

internet warfare is nice to disturb an economy: but it doesnt help to get the enemies resources.

[Losvienleg]

I hated Hillary Clinton, but now I hate her a lot more. She's really dumb ! USA, at the apogee of their power didn't defeated Russia, how could they do it now ?

She is not dumb. She is a warmonger and she is really cunning. She was the mastermind behind the bombing campaigns in Serbia, Bosnia, Kosovo and Libya. Other than the tens of thousands who lost their lives during the bombing campaigns, she has also directly murdered dozens of people (the most notable being Vince W. Foster), without getting prosecuted for any of these crimes.

You're probably right. She's typically the evil socialist. It wouldn't surprise me if she was a Jew. Like Trump said it, how could her give satisfaction to the United States when she's not able to do it for his husband !

[Betwrong]

I hated Hillary Clinton, but now I hate her a lot more. She's really dumb ! USA, at the apogee of their power didn't defeated Russia, how could they do it now ?

She is not dumb. She is a warmonger and she is really cunning. She was the mastermind behind the bombing campaigns in Serbia, Bosnia, Kosovo and Libya. Other than the tens of thousands who lost their lives during the bombing campaigns, she has also directly murdered dozens of people (the most notable being Vince W. Foster), without getting prosecuted for any of these crimes.

You're probably right. She's typically the evil socialist. It wouldn't surprise me if she was a Jew. Like Trump said it, how could her give satisfaction to the United States when she's not able to do it for his husband !

Did Trump really say that? I'm not one his fans actually, but this is funny I must admit.

EDIT: Oh, well, I googled it, it was not his saying. He shared a fan's tweet that read "If Hillary Clinton can't satisfy her husband what makes her think she can satisfy America?". And then he deleted the tweet. So he is not only not smart but a coward also.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/donald-trump-hillary-cant-satisfy-america

[galdur]

If it doesn´t go nuclear, Russia and China seems a pretty safe bet.

Who will fight the next war?

Failures in Iraq and Afghanistan have widened the gulf between most Americans and the armed forces

Oct 24th 2015 | ATLANTA | From the print edition





CRUISING a Walmart in Clayton County, Georgia, with Sergeant Russell Haney of US army recruiting, it would be easy to think most Americans are aching to serve Uncle Sam. Almost every teenager or 20-something he hails, in his cheery Tennessee drawl, amid the mounds of plastic buckets and cut-price tortilla chips, appears tempted by his offer. Lemeanfa, a 19-year-old former football star, says he is halfway sold on it; Dseanna, an 18-year-old shopper, says she is too, provided she won’t have to go to war. Serving in the coffee shop, Archel and Lily, a brother and sister from the US Virgin Islands, listen greedily to the education, training and other benefits the recruiting sergeant reels off. “You don’t want a job, you want a career!” he tells them, as a passer-by thrusts a packet of cookies into his hands, to thank him for his service. ... (more) ....

http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21676778-failures-iraq-and-afghanistan-have-widened-gulf-between-most-americans-and-armed

[bryant.coleman]

^^^^^ Military ineligibility is an issue everywhere, and its is not just limited to the United States. For example, in Eastern Euroepan countries such as Russia and Ukraine, it is even worse. China, Japan and India are not faring that well either. Fortunately, now machines and equipment are increasingly replacing the soldiers.

[LiteCoinGuy]

the rich people will win and the normal people will die. so we should work together and live in peace.

[BADecker]

the rich people will win and the normal people will die. so we should work together and live in peace.

Then the rich people die, because there aren't any "normal" people left to work their fields.   

[Bobekko]

America Has Been At War 93% of the Time – 222 Out of 239 Years – Since 1776

I doubt there'll be a WW3 in the sense you maybe mean it, just more of these unending smaller conflicts.
The winners are always the same..

Lockheed Martin
Boeing
Raytheon

and so on.

[Vika NSFW]

Learn the Shariah law and You will know how to behave in Futere World caliphate.

[bryant.coleman]

Learn the Shariah law and You will know how to behave in Futere World caliphate.

Whenever I get any spare time, I am trying to learn more about the Shakira Law. I have already practiced and mastered Hips Don't Lie. My next aim is to master Whenever, Wherever and Waka Waka This Time for Africa. Might become useful once the European Union becomes Muslim majority in less than 40 years from now. 

[ACAB]

the rich people will win and the normal people will die. so we should work together and live in peace.

Then the rich people die, because there aren't any "normal" people left to work their fields.   

There are always regular people in the world. You kill millions of them, you still have billions of them. Cheap labor never ends.
The only sure winners are war-related companies.

[bytezero]

we guess that will be a WW3, but how many sides will be?  2.. 3.. or even more?  Southamerica, NorthAmerica, EU.... Russia, China, IE.. w/e  in order to know who will win, we need to know the sides.