Who will win WW3?

[Gothorum]

Probably Russia and China.

[apollofire]

Hi Sir, I believe its Russia and China. These both are becoming very aggressive in conquering WW3 space and it seems USA is lagging behind at the moment. There is huge talent available in China and Russia which are working as a professional force to conquer WW3 war. Other emerging markets like India are also in the race. USA and Europe have to rethink their strategies and plans in near future. Thanks

[morantis]

The real question may be who will be in WW III.  It is assumed that all of the current super powers will be there, but it is also very possible that the wars and conflicts that will lead to an inevitable world war will change the face of the world that moves forward into that ultimate conflict.  Then.....WW IV...is that even possible or will the years between point A and point B see the end of organized powers.

[ridery99]

Turkey May Be Hinting At Playing Its Trump Card, Blocking Russia's Bosphorus Access

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/turkey-may-be-hinting-at-playing-its-trump-card-blocki-1745510190

[Come-from-Beyond]

Turkey May Be Hinting At Playing Its Trump Card, Blocking Russia's Bosphorus Access

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/turkey-may-be-hinting-at-playing-its-trump-card-blocki-1745510190

"I don't like you, give me my toys back".

[Richard1972x]

Russia and China. Germany and France will switch over to them within the next years.

[gerald-80]

The answer is The People’s Republic of China. China’s economic growth since the late 70s has been all but totally unprecedented; what’s more impressive than China’s sheer size today is the speed at which it got there, and there’s something to be said about that speed.

The 2013 World Economic League Table report predicts China’s Gross Domestic Product to surpass the United States’ in 2028. China currently spends only 2% of its GDP – versus America’s 4.4% – on military growth.

[Oinas]

Imo R & C, beside more recourses & manpower and better logistics possibilities, the technology is atleast around same level than in US (& puppet EU). Continuous propaganda & Hollywood are making their best to convince otherwise. Sure, same thing on the East.

I hope people in Europe would understand that they are abused by US beeing just an Economic tool & Military buffer.
US will make everything to keep their influence over Europe (from ww2). I think the main reason for massive organized immigration flows to Europe is to make it non-unified and to get it in unstable condition. Just to control it easier, and make sure they won't get too independent. Or even worse, beside independency, get closer relationship with Russia (& China).

But, one day, Europe will rise again!

One interesting question: If so, where will the WW3 ignite? Perhaps in Middle-East or South China Sea. Maybe Ukraine?

[ridery99]

NATO Wants Montenegro In The Alliance, Pissing Off Russia Even More

http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/nato-wants-montenegro-in-the-alliance-pissing-off-russ-1745801107

[BADecker]

Throughout the 20th century, Russia killed more of its citizens than Hitler and the Japs combined in WW2. Over the centuries, China has exterminated untold millions of its own people. However, most of all of these deaths were caused by government leaders.

In America, throughout the 20th century, the common people exterminated 40 to 50 million of their fellow citizens... in abortions alone.

[morantis]

I think the world at large is pretty safe until the next level weapon comes along.  There are some possible nuclear attacks that may take place from lower countries, but even that is hard to believe.  The super powers are pretty much unwilling to use a nuclear attack because the the obvious reasons, they are really hurting themselves as much as the next guy.  However, once a more powerful weapon with greater control and fewer long-term effects hits the world, that is when the super powers will most likely go head to head. 

Slightly off topic....there is a theory about time travel and the super powers that literally has billions and billions of troops hitting the spot where time travel is invented.  Although actual time travel is most likely never going to happen, if it does, the theory is that each and every super power will unload 50 years of "future" troops right there on the doorstep of the inventor at the moment of discovery in an effort to control the technology.  It is actually a well thought out scenario that goes against any sci-fi movie plot.  Just something I ran into recently and thought would fit no better than in this thread.

[nichu]

obviously the one with the most Bitcoin will win

  thats a good thought. country with the most money does win usually ,thats before the nuclear era. now almost every country has nuclear tech and a world war would end the planet what we now know for sure. pray that WW3 never happen

Throughout the 20th century, Russia killed more of its citizens than Hitler and the Japs combined in WW2. Over the centuries, China has exterminated untold millions of its own people. However, most of all of these deaths were caused by government leaders.

In America, throughout the 20th century, the common people exterminated 40 to 50 million of their fellow citizens... in abortions alone.

So how about brits ,portuguese in terms of mass killing  .

[RealBitcoin]

In America, throughout the 20th century, the common people exterminated 40 to 50 million of their fellow citizens... in abortions alone.

Abortions doenst count man. A fetus is not a living human.

It's like saying people have exterminated 1 trillion mosquitos over a year.

[galdur]

Old Kevin Pollak joke where a truck full of bees tipped over, and they are reporting it on the news:

Reporter: Now we are talking to a bee expert, how many bees were lost?

Expert: 80,000...yeah I know, I was just as shocked as you to find out it was a round number.

[BADecker]

In America, throughout the 20th century, the common people exterminated 40 to 50 million of their fellow citizens... in abortions alone.

Abortions doenst count man. A fetus is not a living human.

It's like saying people have exterminated 1 trillion mosquitos over a year.

How long does it take for a baby to get born in the birth process? How long does it take when the baby's first part of his body comes out of the mother until his whole body comes out from his mother?

Let's say mother is in labor. It is almost time for baby to be born. One baby hand comes out first. Is baby a human being yet?

Is he a human being after one arm comes all the way out?

Is he a human being after he comes out to his chest?

If only one foot is left inside mother, is he a human being yet?

Does he have to be all the way out to be a human being?

Baby is a human being when only one hand is out!

Baby is human being 5 minutes before first hand is out, or any part of baby is out.

Baby is human being 10 minutes before first hand is out, or any part of baby is out.

Baby is human being 20 minutes before first hand is out, or any part of baby is out.

Baby is human being 1 day before first hand is out, or any part of baby is out.

Baby is human being 1 week before first hand is out, or any part of baby is out.

Baby is human being 1 month before first hand is out, or any part of baby is out.

Baby is human being 9 months before first hand is out, or any part of baby is out.

You don't think so? All people who suggest that baby is not human being at some time or other, are simply guessing.

Baby is human being from moment of conception. Why? No baby without conception. But baby start to exist at moment of conception.

[RealBitcoin]

How long does it take for a baby to get born in the birth process?

I dont know but following your logic you can say that a sperm is a baby, at which point males are doing genocide every day

Trillions and trillions of sperms wasted on some porn sites.


So it's really hard to define.

[BADecker]

How long does it take for a baby to get born in the birth process?

I dont know but following your logic you can say that a sperm is a baby, at which point males are doing genocide every day

Trillions and trillions of sperms wasted on some porn sites.


So it's really hard to define.

Following your logic one can say that you don't have an answer, since, baby only goes back to conception.

Once baby has been conceived, there is no sperm involved. Prior to baby, there is no baby, but may be sperm.

However, rather than acknowledging that you are wrong, you would rather cloud the issue with sperm, which have nothing to do with anything after conception.

[BADecker]

Russia isn't going to win WW3. If Turkey can shoot down one of her jets, she hasn't got a chance in the world. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1271004.0

[chichidori]

None will win, everyone will be affected, everyone will perish were going to lose everything that we hold dear, and for humanity sake don`t ask for WW3

[BADecker]

None will win, everyone will be affected, everyone will perish were going to lose everything that we hold dear, and for humanity sake don`t ask for WW3

The only difference is, for some of us it will happen a little faster than old age death.