I'm a Rocket Scientist 🚀

[chrisivl]

Interestingly How far humanity can move forward in space exploration in the next 10 years? Will the possible tourist flights, the colonization of the Moon and travel to Mars?

[1715668714]

1715668714

[1715668714]

1715668714

[BADecker]

Interestingly How far humanity can move forward in space exploration in the next 10 years? Will the possible tourist flights, the colonization of the Moon and travel to Mars?

It depends on the state of war and the money system. The indicators that suggest that the money system should have collapsed way back in 2014 are not working. Yet, they are age-old indicators that have always worked in the past. Probably their failure is due to the amount of money brought into being through Quantitative Easing. QE is simply putting off the big crash for a while.

The point? If big war, or the money crash, come, who knows what will happen? There may be no future space exploration at all.

[one-day0]

Interestingly How far humanity can move forward in space exploration in the next 10 years? Will the possible tourist flights, the colonization of the Moon and travel to Mars?

It depends on the state of war and the money system. The indicators that suggest that the money system should have collapsed way back in 2014 are not working. Yet, they are age-old indicators that have always worked in the past. Probably their failure is due to the amount of money brought into being through Quantitative Easing. QE is simply putting off the big crash for a while.

The point? If big war, or the money crash, come, who knows what will happen? There may be no future space exploration at all.

This stealing from the budgets of all countries. Each person has no idea how much it deceived and forced to pay taxes and then steal the money for Nasa.

[BADecker]

Interestingly How far humanity can move forward in space exploration in the next 10 years? Will the possible tourist flights, the colonization of the Moon and travel to Mars?

It depends on the state of war and the money system. The indicators that suggest that the money system should have collapsed way back in 2014 are not working. Yet, they are age-old indicators that have always worked in the past. Probably their failure is due to the amount of money brought into being through Quantitative Easing. QE is simply putting off the big crash for a while.

The point? If big war, or the money crash, come, who knows what will happen? There may be no future space exploration at all.

This stealing from the budgets of all countries. Each person has no idea how much it deceived and forced to pay taxes and then steal the money for Nasa.

Remember one basic thing. Taxes are simply people stealing from people. The idea of Government is just an excuse to make it more palatable for the people being stolen from.

Religions like Islam and Mormonism are religions built on taxes. Many of the other religions are built of free will offerings.

Stop the taxation in a non-rebellious way. Be shrewd, so that you don't get hurt.

[BADecker]

EM Drive is an "impossible" spacecraft engine that generates thrust ...

I'm a fan of physicist Richard Feynman, and one of his most memorable quotes explains that "Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts."

Indeed, the "experts" of science are so often wrong that it makes their arrogance laughable, and today we have yet another example of an emerging, unexplained technology that's sending physicists back to the drawing board to rewrite the supposed "laws" of how the universe works.

The technology in question is called the EM Drive, and it's an "impossible" spacecraft propulsion device that produces real thrust while emitting nothing (i.e. no exhaust) and having no moving parts. "The EM Drive (Electro Magnetic Drive) uses electromagnetic microwave cavities to directly convert electrical energy to thrust without the need to expel any propellant," explains Hacked.com. "[Harold G. White, a scientist] proposes that the EM Drive's thrust is due to virtual particles in the quantum vacuum that behave like propellant ions in magneto-hydrodynamical propulsion systems, extracting 'fuel' from the very fabric of space-time and eliminating the need to carry propellant."

Invented by engineering pioneer Roger Shawyer nearly 15 years ago, the EM Drive has long been ridiculed by "mainstream" scientists in much the same way that cold fusion (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions) have also been widely ridiculed by hot fusion academics.

Yet Shawyer may have the last laugh after all. Martin Tajmar, the Director of Institute and Head of Space Systems at the Dresden University of Technology in Germany, has just reproduced the thrust measurements of the seemingly "impossible" thrust device, conducting his experiment in a vacuum that mimics the environment of space. He presented his findings at the American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics' Propulsion and Energy Forum and Exposition in 2015. You can see his EM Drive talk listed in the event brochure at this link.

EMDrive appears to violate the laws of known physics… but it also appears to work

"Our measurements reveal thrusts as expected from previous claims after carefully studying thermal and electromagnetic interferences," says the science paper. Tests were also conducted in a high vacuum: "We used this setup to test an EMDrive for the first time in high vacuum down to 4×10 -6 mbar observing similar thrusts (although at somewhat lower power levels) ruling out any air influence in this configuration."

Read more and click the links at http://www.naturalnews.com/2016-12-19-em-drive-impossible-spacecraft-propulsion-device-generates-thrust-quantum-vacuum.html.


Note the, above, part that says:

Indeed, the "experts" of science are so often wrong that it makes their arrogance laughable, and today we have yet another example of an emerging, unexplained technology that's sending physicists back to the drawing board to rewrite the supposed "laws" of how the universe works.

[BADecker]

China says tests of Propellentless EMDrive on Tiangong 2 space station were successful

Scientists with the China Academy of Space Technology claim NASA's results 're-confirm' what they'd already achieved, and have plans to implement it in satellites 'as quickly as possible.'

'The establishment of an experimental verification platform to complete the milli-level micro thrust measurement test, as well as several years of repeated experiments and investigations into corresponding interference factors, confirm that in this type of thruster, thrust exists.'

Cast is a subsidiary of the Chinese Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) and the manufacturer of Dong Fang Hong satellites.

According to Li Feng, chief designer of Cast's communication satellite division, the team has built a prototype that so far generates just a few millinewtons of thrust, IBTimes UK reports.

A chinese language paper posted the successful chinese tests of the Emdrive

Successful propellentless Emdrive is tests in microgravity in space would be conclusive and definitive.

Read more and click the links at http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2016/12/china-says-tests-of-propellentless.html.

[crwth]

Not everyone tells a lie but i think the government lie to protect the citizens from panic. Not everyone can handle something like am extra terrestrial beings or just plain old flat Earth.

[BitcoinPicasso]

Not everyone tells a lie but i think the government lie to protect the citizens from panic. Not everyone can handle something like am extra terrestrial beings or just plain old flat Earth.

I can understand them lying about aliens but a flat earth? I think we would all know its flat now for 5000 years if it indeed was flat.

[Jessica136]

OK not really but I've read the "rocket scientists" have been lying about how rockets work; I've learned that rocket engines don't actually work in a vacuum.

Of course you ask "but why would they lie, I don't understand". They lie because they're hiding the fact the Earth is flat and there is no space to travel to or in. We're inside a giant underwater terrarium and atmospheric life is an artificially created novelty.

Need proof? Differently shaped rocket nozzles produce varying degrees of thrust depending on atmospheric pressure.

To answer your question, I need to deeply research on rockets or else I should meet a scientist.

[protokol]

OK not really but I've read the "rocket scientists" have been lying about how rockets work; I've learned that rocket engines don't actually work in a vacuum.

Of course you ask "but why would they lie, I don't understand". They lie because they're hiding the fact the Earth is flat and there is no space to travel to or in. We're inside a giant underwater terrarium and atmospheric life is an artificially created novelty.

Need proof? Differently shaped rocket nozzles produce varying degrees of thrust depending on atmospheric pressure.

To answer your question, I need to deeply research on rockets or else I should meet a scientist.

No, you don't need to do any deep research. You just need to do the experiment I proposed earlier in the thread (which has not yet been refuted):

There seems to be an issue with rockets exploding or falling into the ocean.

Rockets sometimes do that, turns out it's not as easy as you might think to shoot a rocket into orbit. It would be far more suspicious if rockets bound for orbit had a 100% success rate.

Back to your original assertion, which was that rockets don't work in a vacuum. You're wrong.
You don't even need a vacuum chamber to test this, here's a simple experiment that you can do at home to prove conservation of momentum.

Put yourself in a state of low friction, for example sit in a chair with wheels or stand on a skateboard. Now, pick up a heavy object, and throw it away from you. You will move in the opposite way to the object. This is primary school level physics.

In this analogy, you are the rocket and the object you threw is the rocket fuel. Now, you might think that this only works because the object is pushing off the air or some such bullshit. Well then, why not try it with a much lighter object of the same volume, such as a balloon. You will see that if you throw an gas filled balloon in the same way, you will barely move at all.

Congratulations, you just proved a fundamental law of physics, and subsequently that rockets certainly can work in a vacuum!

[BADecker]

Private moon rovers may visit the Apollo 17 landing site

The Apollo 17 landing site has been abandoned since the last lunar astronauts went home in 1972. Now the site could get its first visitor in 44 years, as private companies race to the moon in the Google Lunar Xprize competition. A German team known as the PartTimeScientists plans to send its rovers to the Apollo 17 landing site and examine the moon buggy left behind by astronauts Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.

PartTimeScientists is the fourth team to book a flight to the moon. A rocket rideshare company called Spaceflight Inc. is handling the launch contract. Exactly which rocket it will ride on (and when) is still up in the air.

Read more at http://www.popsci.com/private-moon-rovers-may-visit-apollo-17-landing-site.

[ZlaiaZaia]

Private moon rovers may visit the Apollo 17 landing site

The Apollo 17 landing site has been abandoned since the last lunar astronauts went home in 1972. Now the site could get its first visitor in 44 years, as private companies race to the moon in the Google Lunar Xprize competition. A German team known as the PartTimeScientists plans to send its rovers to the Apollo 17 landing site and examine the moon buggy left behind by astronauts Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.

PartTimeScientists is the fourth team to book a flight to the moon. A rocket rideshare company called Spaceflight Inc. is handling the launch contract. Exactly which rocket it will ride on (and when) is still up in the air.

Read more at http://www.popsci.com/private-moon-rovers-may-visit-apollo-17-landing-site.

It seems to me that people do not knowingly repeat trips to the moon after the first glad. After all, there is even commercial interests, but all that it takes. And nobody says anything public. What is the problem.

[SparkedDev]

Helium-3 mining might be a reason to keep going there is much more of it on the moon then on earth.

[BADecker]

Private moon rovers may visit the Apollo 17 landing site

The Apollo 17 landing site has been abandoned since the last lunar astronauts went home in 1972. Now the site could get its first visitor in 44 years, as private companies race to the moon in the Google Lunar Xprize competition. A German team known as the PartTimeScientists plans to send its rovers to the Apollo 17 landing site and examine the moon buggy left behind by astronauts Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.

PartTimeScientists is the fourth team to book a flight to the moon. A rocket rideshare company called Spaceflight Inc. is handling the launch contract. Exactly which rocket it will ride on (and when) is still up in the air.

Read more at http://www.popsci.com/private-moon-rovers-may-visit-apollo-17-landing-site.

It seems to me that people do not knowingly repeat trips to the moon after the first glad. After all, there is even commercial interests, but all that it takes. And nobody says anything public. What is the problem.

The problem might be that we never went there. It seems there is a lot of evidence that the moon shots were faked.

[one-day0]

During the Cold War, space was one of the arenas for the struggle between the Soviet Union and the United States. Geopolitical confrontation between the superpowers - the main stimulus in those years for the development of the space industry. On the implementation of the space program has been thrown a huge amount of resources. In particular, on the implementation of the "Apollo" project, whose main objective was landing a man on the moon, the US government has spent about twenty-five billion dollars. What will be the continuation of this confrontation will be offended if the huge opening.

[elena-tur]

Private moon rovers may visit the Apollo 17 landing site

The Apollo 17 landing site has been abandoned since the last lunar astronauts went home in 1972. Now the site could get its first visitor in 44 years, as private companies race to the moon in the Google Lunar Xprize competition. A German team known as the PartTimeScientists plans to send its rovers to the Apollo 17 landing site and examine the moon buggy left behind by astronauts Gene Cernan and Harrison Schmitt.

PartTimeScientists is the fourth team to book a flight to the moon. A rocket rideshare company called Spaceflight Inc. is handling the launch contract. Exactly which rocket it will ride on (and when) is still up in the air.

Read more at http://www.popsci.com/private-moon-rovers-may-visit-apollo-17-landing-site.

It seems to me that people do not knowingly repeat trips to the moon after the first glad. After all, there is even commercial interests, but all that it takes. And nobody says anything public. What is the problem.

The problem might be that we never went there. It seems there is a lot of evidence that the moon shots were faked.

It is believed that the moon at all and that the artificial body may be that it is generally alien base. That's what people are frightened and flew there.

[eminem90]

From the point of view of economic expediency of the program "Space Shuttle" can hardly be called successful. Spaceships disposable proved to be much more economical than their seemingly more technologically advanced reusable counterparts. Yes, and flight safety to the "shuttles" in doubt.

[maister77777]

From the point of view of economic expediency of the program "Space Shuttle" can hardly be called successful. Spaceships disposable proved to be much more economical than their seemingly more technologically advanced reusable counterparts. Yes, and flight safety to the "shuttles" in doubt.

Environmental disasters, overpopulation, wars and other crises have forced humanity with caution and be wary of experimentation and limit yourself to the home planet. Many now believe that the study and settlement of space can be by addressing some of the pressing problems in the world. As a result of space flights is significantly moved forward in comparison with the beginning of the century. Therefore, the price does not matter.

[BADecker]

Jerry Pournelle talks about China's orbital tests of the EMDrive as a bigger than Sputnik moment

Jerry Eugene Pournelle (born August 7, 1933) is an American science fiction writer, essayist and journalist who contributed for many years to the computer magazine Byte. Pournelle was an intellectual protégé of Russell Kirk and Stefan T. Possony. Pournelle wrote numerous publications with Possony, including The Strategy of Technology (1970). The Strategy has been used as a textbook at the United States Military Academy (West Point), the United States Air Force Academy (Colorado Springs), the Air War College, and the National War College.

Pournelle worked in the aerospace industry includes time he worked at Boeing in the late-1950s. While there, he worked on Project Thor, conceiving of "hypervelocity rod bundles", also known as "rods from God". He edited Project 75, a 1964 study of 1975 defense requirements. He worked in operations research at The Aerospace Corporation, and North American Rockwell Space Division, and was founding President of the Pepperdine Research Institute. In 1989, Pournelle, Max Hunter, and retired Army Lieutenant General Daniel O. Graham made a presentation to then Vice President Dan Quayle promoting development of the DC-X rocket.

Read more at http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2016/12/jerry-pournelle-talks-about-chinas.html.


[Note that properly designed, the EMdrive can propel things on earth, as well.]

[CryptoCypherCoin]

good work dude