I'm a Rocket Scientist 🚀

[protokol]

There seems to be an issue with rockets exploding or falling into the ocean.

Rockets sometimes do that, turns out it's not as easy as you might think to shoot a rocket into orbit. It would be far more suspicious if rockets bound for orbit had a 100% success rate.

Back to your original assertion, which was that rockets don't work in a vacuum. You're wrong.
You don't even need a vacuum chamber to test this, here's a simple experiment that you can do at home to prove conservation of momentum.

Put yourself in a state of low friction, for example sit in a chair with wheels or stand on a skateboard. Now, pick up a heavy object, and throw it away from you. You will move in the opposite way to the object. This is primary school level physics.

In this analogy, you are the rocket and the object you threw is the rocket fuel. Now, you might think that this only works because the object is pushing off the air or some such bullshit. Well then, why not try it with a much lighter object of the same volume, such as a balloon. You will see that if you throw an gas filled balloon in the same way, you will barely move at all.

Congratulations, you just proved a fundamental law of physics, and subsequently that rockets certainly can work in a vacuum!

[1715165691]

1715165691

[1715165691]

1715165691

[notbatman]

Have you ever seen the trick where the magician pulls the tablecloth out from under a set table? He uses inertia to hold the objects in place and never overcomes the minimum threshold required to move the objects. The mass emitted from a rocket isn't enough to overcome that minimum threshold. The synthesis here is that thrust comes from air pressure.

[noormcs5]

if you r rocket scientist you should need to study more and more and more.Then you will clear your points automatically. 

[notbatman]

This post belongs here.

Here is the real footage on how "high" the so called actornauts can go:

SpaceX Falcon 9 SES Launch real footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ac6x0TgFuUc

 

[notbatman]

Thunderbirds are go!







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha7G2XYvAwU
"Space X Busted Faking Space - The Final Nail In The Coffin" -- Russianvids

[notbatman]

PUTTING TO REST FAKE SATELLITES USING HALE TELESCOPE by Captain Obvious
--

--
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBcupQSQ5tE

[Spoetnik]

I wish i was a Rocket Doctor myself

I don't believe the OP here.. he is Trolling on us all !

[nomad13666]

NASA Fail Compilation


The only thing that NASA has ever sent to space is your imagination.

[BADecker]

Rockets don't depend on atmosphere to push against, although some toy rockets (like released balloons) might a little. Rather, they work on the principle of inertia.

If you are standing on a smooth sheet of ice in the winter, and a friend is standing next to you, if you push against your friend, you both move in opposite directions on the slippery ice. This happens because of inertia.

In a rocket in a vacuum, the fuel has weight. It has inertia, the tendency for it to remain in whatever motion it is going. Then, the fuel is exploded in the rocket engine in a controlled explosion. Because of its inertia, and the sudden change by the explosion in the engine, it pushes the rocket ahead. This action is like when you push your friend on the ice. Both of you move in opposite directions, sliding on the ice.

The rocket moves one way while the spent fuel moves the other way. The rocket engine pushes against the tendency of the rocket fuel to remain unmoving. The explosion is rapid enough that this can happen. Atmosphere is a hindrance more than it is a help.

[MisO69]

OP, may i ask how much you earn per month and how much you would be willing to invest to proof without a doubt (!!) that flat earth is real and everything else a hoax?

There are several methods of doing so depending on how much money you are willing to spend.

Put your money where your mouth is!

This thread is about rockets and fraud. Like the fraud perpetrated on the British taxpayer by the Royal Aircraft Establishment with their BLACK ARROW rocket program in the 1960's.

You mean the UK Goatse Rocket?

After seeing that pic I just had a flashback of Moonraker.

[nomad13666]

OP, may i ask how much you earn per month and how much you would be willing to invest to proof without a doubt (!!) that flat earth is real and everything else a hoax?

There are several methods of doing so depending on how much money you are willing to spend.

Put your money where your mouth is!

This thread is about rockets and fraud. Like the fraud perpetrated on the British taxpayer by the Royal Aircraft Establishment with their BLACK ARROW rocket program in the 1960's.

You mean the UK Goatse Rocket?

After seeing that pic I just had a flashback of Moonraker.

I think that's the main idea 

[BADecker]

OP, may i ask how much you earn per month and how much you would be willing to invest to proof without a doubt (!!) that flat earth is real and everything else a hoax?

There are several methods of doing so depending on how much money you are willing to spend.

Put your money where your mouth is!

This thread is about rockets and fraud. Like the fraud perpetrated on the British taxpayer by the Royal Aircraft Establishment with their BLACK ARROW rocket program in the 1960's.

You mean the UK Goatse Rocket?

After seeing that pic I just had a flashback of Moonraker.

I think that's the main idea 

You Only Live Twice

[Milkduds]

True Story...

I was reading the forum thread titles real fast and thought the title read "Racist Scientist" and I clicked expecting something really interesting.

[BADecker]

True Story...

I was reading the forum thread titles real fast and thought the title read "Racist Scientist" and I clicked expecting something really interesting.

What? You are a racist against rocket people?   

[nomad13666]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zcz0eL_bYsI

[BADecker]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zcz0eL_bYsI

A picture is worth a thousand words. Then Adobe developed Photoshop, and some folks used it to start the flat earth religion. Now a picture is worth little or nothing, 'cause anybody can make any picture they want.

[X7]

OK not really but I've read the "rocket scientists" have been lying about how rockets work; I've learned that rocket engines don't actually work in a vacuum.

Of coarse you ask "but why would they lie, I don't understand". They lie because they're hiding the fact the Earth is flat and there is no space to travel to or in. We're inside a giant underwater terrarium and atmospheric life is an artificially created novelty.

Need proof? Differently shaped rocket nozzles produce varying degrees of thrust depending on atmospheric pressure.

A rocket scientist who doesn't know the difference between coarse and course. Hold on let me consult google so I may also sound like an expert on the matter.

Where does space start?

Most jet planes don't fly above 15km (9.5 miles, 50,000ft), where there's still enough oxygen to burn fuel in their engines and keep them flying, but that's nowhere near the start of space. Space is generally defined as starting at about 100km (60 miles) above Earth (an arbitrary point sometimes called the Kármán line), which is where conventional planes would struggle to make enough lift to stay in the air. That doesn't mean Earth's atmosphere is all done and dusted by that point; far from it! The lowest satellites (known as low-earth orbit (LEO) satellites) fly at heights above 160km or 100 miles from Earth, which is over 10 times higher than planes fly. Even so, they still feel some drag (aerodynamic resistance) from the outer reaches of our atmosphere, which fizzles on up to 800km (500 miles) or higher.

You might think space is a long way away, but a hundred kilometers is not so far: a car, hurtling along at highway speed, would take just an hour to get you there; a rocket will get there about 20 times faster—in just 3 minutes.

What is space like?

From the point of someone designing a rocket, space is the place effectively beyond Earth's reach—beyond most of its gravity and atmosphere. Although we tend to think of it as a vacuum, it's not completely empty. There's radiation zipping through it (there must be—how else would we see all those distant stars and planets?), meteorites nipping past, "cosmic dust," and even bits of space junk (broken bits of satellites and rockets). Perhaps the best way to think of space is as a place of wild extremes: emptiness, weightlessness (when you're far from any planets). One minute, deep darkness and extreme cold (when you're shaded from the sun); the next, blinding light, dangerous cosmic radiation, and extreme heat.

Is there more than one kind of space?

Mostly we're interested in the interplanetary space of our own Solar System (the area round the Sun), which is measured in distances of millions of kilometers. But space telescopes and unmanned probes also study the further reaches of what's called interstellar space (the space between stars), measured in vastly greater distances called light years (the distance light travels in one year, which is almost 10 trillion kilometers). The Milky Way galaxy, of which our solar system is just one part, measures about 100,000 light years (1 million, million, million km) across.

Space, if you haven't figured it out already, is a pretty big place!

#YoFam

[notbatman]

^ Thanks for the tip (corrected), good thing I'm a rocket scientist and not an English teacher.



There's an area up there where they hang things called "satellites" from weather balloons. This is as close to "outer-space" as it gets, everything else is a lie or a hoax.

[nomad13666]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zcz0eL_bYsI

A picture is worth a thousand words. Then Adobe developed Photoshop, and some folks used it to start the flat earth religion. Now a picture is worth little or nothing, 'cause anybody can make any picture they want.

The only thing photoshopped in the above image is the text.

The photo was used as the cover art of "The Texas Freemason" magazine's August 1966 issue.

Long before Adobe created photoslop.

Nice debunk try....aaaaand fail.

GTFO



If anyone has lingering doubts of the overwhelming influence of the Masonic order in planning, staffing, engineering, navigating and finally piloting of NASA’s immensely complex interplanetary expeditions of Apollo 11 and other flights, these images should provide confirmation. The official magazine of the Grand Lodge of Texas published this issue in August, 1966, three years before Apollo 11, showing on the cover what appears to be something quite similar to the Eagle lunar landing module. In front are Masonic astronaut Gordon Cooper (right), who the magazine says “carried a flag bearing the Square and Compasses into outer space.” Also shown are the Texas grand master of Masons, H. W. Fullingim (center), and an unidentified official at left.

[nomad13666]

Official 2002 NASA image of "Blue Marble v2.0"



...featuring Photoshop 6.0 





Fuck all of you masonic retards. Your day of reckoning is fast approaching.