Apparently, the suppressed Bitcoin XT is permitted a full explanation of it's position, but the position of the Bitcoin Core censors deserves zero explanation whatsoever. Roger has a strange way of representing both sides of the debate, as he claims to adhere to.
Someone promoting a centralising solution to the scaling problem cannot also claim to be an anarchist.
Saying big miners are centralized is like saying the Boston Marathon is rigged because Kenyan runners often win.
I'd have to actually have said that for your reply to make any sense, though.
And big miners are a problem: if one miner is more than 51% of the network, you can kiss your monetary freedom goodbye. Remember? So lets not pretend that centralising mining can ever be construed as good for Bitcoin; every wave of centralisation brings us closer to a situation where those miners decide whether you're allowed to use their network or not.
