2026 NBA Season

[Fredomago]

There's a lot of people here who think the Spurs will bounce back and even up the series.
Spurs line has moved to -6.5 which is essentially a very comfortable win; I think they get it done but not sure of the point spread.

And for sure there are lots of movement before and during the live event, let see if how bookies will offer their odds and how gambler will pick especially with the handicap, those who have confidence supporting Spurs it will be easy to them to place either with ML or handicap as there's a big chance that Spurs will not let this game to lose, they need to play harder to tie the series and keep their chase in a uch better standing.

[Russlenat]

There's a lot of people here who think the Spurs will bounce back and even up the series.
Spurs line has moved to -6.5 which is essentially a very comfortable win; I think they get it done but not sure of the point spread.

And for sure there are lots of movement before and during the live event, let see if how bookies will offer their odds and how gambler will pick especially with the handicap, those who have confidence supporting Spurs it will be easy to them to place either with ML or handicap as there's a big chance that Spurs will not let this game to lose, they need to play harder to tie the series and keep their chase in a uch better standing.

There is no line movement as I am seeing now, the line stays at -6.5 for the Spurs despite the Knicks probably getting more bets here.

If the pressure is really felt by the bettors, the line could have moved to something like -5.5 or -4.5, but it did not happen.
That means the sharps are likely backing the Spurs tonight.

Let's go SPURS!

[fullfitlarry]

There's a lot of people here who think the Spurs will bounce back and even up the series.
Spurs line has moved to -6.5 which is essentially a very comfortable win; I think they get it done but not sure of the point spread.

And for sure there are lots of movement before and during the live event, let see if how bookies will offer their odds and how gambler will pick especially with the handicap, those who have confidence supporting Spurs it will be easy to them to place either with ML or handicap as there's a big chance that Spurs will not let this game to lose, they need to play harder to tie the series and keep their chase in a uch better standing.

Not seeing that much movement in the odds, still the same as what @Russlenat says. Spurs are still the favorite but there could be bettors that really go for the underdog just like what happen in game 1.

But the thing is that the Spurs can't afford a 0-2 deficit going into game 3 at the homecourt of the Knicks. That's why this is a must win for them and that could be most of the bettors are seeing pushing their all-in bets on the Spurs for this pivotal game 2.

[OgNasty]

KAT is really taking care of business out there. The Knicks finished the half strong and the Spurs are struggling to keep up when Wemby is on the bench. I think it’ll be tough for the Knicks to keep up their shooting, but if they can, they could go up 2-0. I think their shooting balances out in the second half though and the Spurs even it up.

[Harkorede]

KAT is really taking care of business out there. The Knicks finished the half strong and the Spurs are struggling to keep up when Wemby is on the bench. I think it’ll be tough for the Knicks to keep up their shooting, but if they can, they could go up 2-0. I think their shooting balances out in the second half though and the Spurs even it up.

The fact that Jalen Brunson haven’t had to do much and at the same the New York Knicks are leading is surprising, they’ve done a stellar job defensively on Wemby, and their usual alternative source for offense Stephon Castle is dealing with foul trouble, this one could be going of hands for the Spurs because they’ve always needed a huge lead to protect in the 2nd half, if this game should go down to a basket by basket, or possession by possession scenario, then Knicks might just win this as well.

[OgNasty]

That’s about all you can ask for as far as a finals game ending goes. A shame that Wemby couldn’t make the last shot to get the win, but they did good. Down 2-0 the Spurs are going to have to figure something out quick. One more loss and it’s as good as over with.

[Shinpako09]

That’s about all you can ask for as far as a finals game ending goes. A shame that Wemby couldn’t make the last shot to get the win, but they did good. Down 2-0 the Spurs are going to have to figure something out quick. One more loss and it’s as good as over with.

I really thought he could make that final shot. They had a great run in the fourth quarter, so I honestly thought the series would be tied. I was waiting for one of their clutch threes, but it never came. Actually, I didn’t expect the Spurs to be down by two, a team that had beaten the Thunder.

Now I’m thinking, if it were OKC against the Knicks, I don’t think they would be down by two. The Spurs really need to do even better next game to keep their chances alive. They missed eight free throws, and that’s a huge number in the Finals.

I can only imagine how alive and wild New York City would be if the Knicks win the championship. Also, KAT getting his ring before his former team would be pretty funny. Lol. I still don’t understand why they let go of KAT and kept Gobert. They moved on from him just because they saw a new face of the franchise.

[OgNasty]

That pass off Castle’s back was a pretty bad way for them to lose the game, but they almost had it. I have faith they’ll continue to get it figured out. I think if they can take game 3 in New York on Monday they can still bring home a finals victory.

[coinrifft]

That pass off Castle’s back was a pretty bad way for them to lose the game, but they almost had it. I have faith they’ll continue to get it figured out. I think if they can take game 3 in New York on Monday they can still bring home a finals victory.

Costly error of Wemby on that play, and then he has the chance to win it for them but missed the shot. First time that we have seen Wemby somewhat rattled on this kind of clutch situation. Hopefully, they can still bounce back in game 3. Otherwise, it might be another sweep for the Knicks here and win the NBA ring after so many years.

So let's see, they made the adjustments here but it was not enough for the time. And he needed someone from San Antonio to score more and contribute a balance attack just like what they did against the series on Thunder.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

That pass off Castle’s back was a pretty bad way for them to lose the game, but they almost had it. I have faith they’ll continue to get it figured out. I think if they can take game 3 in New York on Monday they can still bring home a finals victory.

I also still have hope, but time will tell. I wonder why they didn't call a timeout. I mean they didn't really have a chance for a transition basket, and anyway you wanna run the clock down to the last 2 seconds to take a shot. A timeout is the only reasonable action in this scenario. If the players don't take it then the coach should.
Wemby basically throwing it away was really sad, yet castle also shouldn't have turned his back in my opinion since Wemby is not the playmaker. Also, he didn't really pick up speed or anything, just jogging to the other side not paying attentions what's happening.
Anyway, mistakes happen, especially for a young team like this. If the last shot would have gone in it would all have been forgotten, but well.....

[yenerbatmaz]

New York is just two games away from the championship. They have all the advantages from the first two games. I don't know if there's ever been a 4-0 sweep in the finals before, but it looks like it will happen this year.
New York won the second game 104-105.
In previous games, Champagnie contributed significantly to the scoring, but in this game, they scored less, resulting in a loss. New York is just two games away from becoming this year's champion.

[Cointxz]

New York is just two games away from the championship. They have all the advantages from the first two games. I don't know if there's ever been a 4-0 sweep in the finals before, but it looks like it will happen this year.
New York won the second game 104-105.
In previous games, Champagnie contributed significantly to the scoring, but in this game, they scored less, resulting in a loss. New York is just two games away from becoming this year's champion.

There’s a lot of NBA finals that turns into sweep. Here’s the list that I gathered using chatgpt.

NBA Finals Sweeps (4-0)

• 2018 - Golden State Warriors over Cleveland Cavaliers (4-0)
• 2007 - San Antonio Spurs over Cleveland Cavaliers (4-0)
• 2002 - Los Angeles Lakers over New Jersey Nets (4-0)
• 1995 - Houston Rockets over Orlando Magic (4-0)
• 1989 - Detroit Pistons over Los Angeles Lakers (4-0)
• 1983 - Philadelphia 76ers over Los Angeles Lakers (4-0)
• 1975 - Golden State Warriors over Washington Bullets (4-0)
• 1971 - Milwaukee Bucks over Baltimore Bullets (4-0)
• 1959 - Boston Celtics over Minneapolis Lakers (4-0)

Total: 9 NBA Finals sweeps

The recent match is so close for Spurs to win. If only Wemby manage shoot his last 2 field goal attempt to get the lead. He should attack or penetrate the paint for a more guaranteed points instead of jump shot
 for chance to get a foul.

I doubt this will be a sweep considering the result of this game. Spurs is already adjusting on Knicks offense.

[Stavri]

btw i wrote about OKC before. now a really tough summer awaits them. They probably won't keep Dort and they'll need to convince Hart to take a pay cut to stay. and they'll have to pay the draft rookies they select at 12 and 17...

That's gonna be hard for them.

IIRC, they're one of the teams that has the most expense for their roster and after this fall they got for this season.

I don't think that's encouraging anymore to keep with the roster they have and they seriously need a pay check cut for some of them who's got overly paid.

imo OKC have to break up their big three no matter what, just to keep their team system running without changing it...
What makes them so good is forcing turnovers through high intensity pressure and converting them into points. if they lose the players who provide this specific trait, their level will drop.

[blomen]

i don’t think the knicks will be champions with a 4-0 sweep, but it’s interesting that the spurs lost both games where they were the favorites on paper.

for spurs, a single point made the difference between tying the series at 1-1 or falling behind 2-0. if wemby hadn’t missed that shot, they’d be in a very different situation right now. the next two games will definitely be much more intense for the spurs.

[emrecemsan]

I also don't think Knicks will be able to turn this into a sweep. But starting the series 2-0 is way beyond the expectations for sure! This can't be explained by only fatigue on Spurs side.

Knicks just played better in both games. Game 2 was much more competitive though but still it wasn't enough for Spurs... Brunson saved his team in the last minute.

Wemby was better this time. Fox - Harper - Vassell trio also did their best but here we are.

[Stavri]

I also don't think Knicks will be able to turn this into a sweep. But starting the series 2-0 is way beyond the expectations for sure! This can't be explained by only fatigue on Spurs side.

Knicks just played better in both games. Game 2 was much more competitive though but still it wasn't enough for Spurs... Brunson saved his team in the last minute.

Wemby was better this time. Fox - Harper - Vassell trio also did their best but here we are.

imo bad thing for the Spurs was Fox's return. When Fox was out, Harper was taking on way more responsibility and being highly effective, which elevated Spurs to a better level. It’s strange but true. rookie Harper is a better player than Fox even right now.
Spurs will consistently be in the Finals in the coming years... Harper is an absolute jackpot.

[passwordnow]

I also don't think Knicks will be able to turn this into a sweep. But starting the series 2-0 is way beyond the expectations for sure! This can't be explained by only fatigue on Spurs side.

Knicks just played better in both games. Game 2 was much more competitive though but still it wasn't enough for Spurs... Brunson saved his team in the last minute.

Wemby was better this time. Fox - Harper - Vassell trio also did their best but here we are.

It's just a possibility that they'll be sweeping the Spurs but just as how Spurs made a good fight against the OKC, there will be some wins and hopefully that happens. But yes, this advantage of having 2-0 for the Knicks gives them the confidence and that momentum that will push them more on the next 2 games in their home court.

[arwin100]

I also don't think Knicks will be able to turn this into a sweep. But starting the series 2-0 is way beyond the expectations for sure! This can't be explained by only fatigue on Spurs side.

Knicks just played better in both games. Game 2 was much more competitive though but still it wasn't enough for Spurs... Brunson saved his team in the last minute.

Wemby was better this time. Fox - Harper - Vassell trio also did their best but here we are.

It's just a possibility that they'll be sweeping the Spurs but just as how Spurs made a good fight against the OKC, there will be some wins and hopefully that happens. But yes, this advantage of having 2-0 for the Knicks gives them the confidence and that momentum that will push them more on the next 2 games in their home court.

Having 0 - 2 on Spurs home is great advantage for Knicks.

Now that they are playing on their home there's a chance that they can able to score a sweep if they continue to play like that and try to limit the core players of Spurs.

But for sure that Spurs will not gonna allow it and they don't want to be an easy prey for Knicks. So let's see if Spurs could able to revive their chance and steal the game 3 on Knicks home.

[Natalim]

But for sure that Spurs will not gonna allow it and they don't want to be an easy prey for Knicks. So let's see if Spurs could able to revive their chance and steal the game 3 on Knicks home.

I already lost my hope on the Spurs, maybe they think they will not allow it to happen, but at the same time, the Knicks are also thinking of not allowing them to win on their home court. So it is not about how they think or feel, it is about what we saw in the last 2 games, and obviously, it is the Knicks who are the better team because even if Brunson does not produce good numbers, others are stepping up for him.

That is a tough job for the Spurs honestly, it is just that in coaching and players, the Knicks are the better team overall.

[LogitechMouse]

That pass off Castle’s back was a pretty bad way for them to lose the game, but they almost had it. I have faith they’ll continue to get it figured out. I think if they can take game 3 in New York on Monday they can still bring home a finals victory.

On that final seconds of the game, we just saw how inexperienced the Spurs are when it comes to the playoffs. I've said in the past how important playoff experience can be, and in this series, we just saw the difference on both teams when it comes to that aspect. Nobody in the Spurs have experience in NBA Finals while on the Knicks, they have Anunoby, and their Coach also has when he's been with the Warriors.

That pass will be known as the "worst pass of the NBA Finals" just because of how awful it is. Imagine you're the best team on the best team in the West, and you have the opportunity to carry the ball and take the lead. Instead you passed it to another player very awful, and not only that but you also fouled one of the best free throw shooter right now in Brunson. He also had the opportunity to redeem himself by taking the final shot, but it just didn't went in. The sequence of events is just very bad to see if you're a Spurs fan. Even I'm also shocked by what happened, but on the flip side, I've watched the whole game and there are plays where the Spurs are just scrambling on defense while the Knicks are flawlessly doing it.

I'll give some trivia that's based on a quick google search.
1. There are only 2 teams in NBA Finals history where they won the first 2 games on the road, and both of them ended up winning the title. The Knicks are just the third team to do so.
2. Teams who won the first 2 games regardless whether it's on the road or on the home wins the series 86.1% of the time (31 out of 36).

In their last series against the Thunder, I said that they only have less than 20% chance of winning based on history. Now that they lost 2, they only have 14% chance of winning, but we can't deny the fact that the 2 teams who managed to stole the first 2 games on the road managed to win the title. I predicted that the Spurs will be winning on this one, but based on the first 2 games, it seems like the Knicks will be winning it. They're just better offensively and defensively.