Bitcoin Forum
December 03, 2016, 09:59:04 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: IMF is "missing" 230 tons of gold?  (Read 3019 times)
unspy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25



View Profile WWW
June 05, 2011, 10:03:35 AM
 #1


Quote
The arrest of former IMF head Strauss-Kahn came at a key moment in this secretive entity's  emergency bailout operations for Greece, Ireland and Portugal, and IMF advanced action in several other Eurozone-17 countries facing similar sovereign-debt crises. Strauss-Kahn's disappearance to Rikers Island prison in New York surely made things more difficult on the Greek negotiations... The missing gold, already sold (or of course possibly stolen by Martians), does not in any way transparently figure in official data, but it most surely figured on the piccolo libretti that Mr Strauss-Kahn toted around, at least when he was in horizontal posture and not too close to unwary females. To be sure this was in the great tradition of leading financiers such as Bernardo Provenzano, until his sudden and surprising, but well arranged fall from grace on April 11, 2006. The missing amount in question is around 230 tons. Intelligent eight-year-olds can tell us a metric ton weights about 32, 150.477 Troy ounces, and each one of them fetches about $1500. At present.

So now that the cat is out of the bag, do the globees had a plan
to recover the missing gold? Well, let me take a wild-ass guess.

Quote
According to the latest figures of the International Monetary Fund, Central Bank of Libya under
Gaddafi's control holds nearly 144 tons of gold. Some of the information, said the exact number
may be higher by several tons. Libya is ranked number 25 among the largest gold reserves in the
world, worth over 6.5 billion dollars at the present time.

Back in 2007, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi entrusted $94 billion through
his sovereign wealth fund to Goldman Sachs and in short order the
investment bank lost approximately all of it. My guess is most of it
is squirreled away in the City of London. Now the Britts have teamed
up with the USA and Al CIAada for a "kentic action" against Libya.

Missing IMF Gold? No problem, we'll just take Gaddafi's gold.

The Libyan leader is sitting on a mountain of gold. I'm sure
the somebody is thinking: "Why not help our selves to that
too while we're at it." Sure! Why not, we're bombing the
shit out of that country anyways.

Hell we did it with Iraq, so what the diff? World War III is
about to kick of, so who cares? In the end it will just be a
small footnote in the annuals of history, right?

This seem to be what these criminal minds are thinking.





- Honest government requires honest money
- Decentralize everything, start with money
"Revolt now or be a debt slave." ~Max Keiser
1480802344
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480802344

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480802344
Reply with quote  #2

1480802344
Report to moderator
1480802344
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480802344

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480802344
Reply with quote  #2

1480802344
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1480802344
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480802344

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480802344
Reply with quote  #2

1480802344
Report to moderator
1480802344
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480802344

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480802344
Reply with quote  #2

1480802344
Report to moderator
1480802344
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1480802344

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1480802344
Reply with quote  #2

1480802344
Report to moderator
BCEmporium
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile
June 05, 2011, 03:41:44 PM
 #2

World War III already ended... the next one would be WW IV.

WW III is the correct term to define the US vs USSR by-proxy wars. Actually they caused more havoc and victims than WW 2...
speeder
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
June 05, 2011, 05:03:11 PM
 #3

World War III already ended... the next one would be WW IV.

WW III is the correct term to define the US vs USSR by-proxy wars. Actually they caused more havoc and victims than WW 2...

I think people only consider a World War when people actually engage each other.

We will have a WW III when you see USA flying people to Russia or Russia flying people to USA (or something like that).

"Helping" in civil wars, is not really what I count as a World War. (although it DOES cause much havok... here in Brazil is common to some person lament someone that went missing after being even suspected of being pro-Russia)

unspy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25



View Profile WWW
June 05, 2011, 07:12:05 PM
 #4

World War III already ended... the next one would be WW IV.

WW III is the correct term to define the US vs USSR by-proxy wars. Actually they caused more havoc and victims than WW 2...

I think people only consider a World War when people actually engage each other.

America have "boot on the ground" in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen, and now Libya.
How many countries does America need to invade before people call it a World War?

If fight wars on more than one continent is what qualifies as a World War, I'd say we're there already.

- Honest government requires honest money
- Decentralize everything, start with money
"Revolt now or be a debt slave." ~Max Keiser
speeder
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
June 06, 2011, 12:06:38 PM
 #5

US is for now fighting multiple wars, not a World War.

World War is when the entire world is at war with each other, not when there are wars over the entire world.

Otherwise we would call every single imperialistic effort a World War.

BCEmporium
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile
June 06, 2011, 12:33:13 PM
 #6

On both "World Wars" the entire World wasn't at war... We call WW to large scale wars between two large factions that drags a shit load of allies from each side, which was the case of the cold war, even if the factions didn't directly engaged each other.
To the latest imperialistic attempts, those yes, doesn't seams to fall under the concept of World War.
speeder
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546



View Profile
June 06, 2011, 01:21:06 PM
 #7

On both "World Wars" the entire World wasn't at war... We call WW to large scale wars between two large factions that drags a shit load of allies from each side, which was the case of the cold war, even if the factions didn't directly engaged each other.
To the latest imperialistic attempts, those yes, doesn't seams to fall under the concept of World War.

Actual worldwide wars happened before, (two factions dragging shitloads of allies all over the world to war), but I think the difference, and what made people call the two World Wars as World Wars, and expect the third to use nukes, is the fact that those World Wars were also Total Wars (Total War is when the entire country turns into a war machine, the US in WWII for example, that started to churn out machines, send all males to battlefield and send females to factories to make more ammo, supplies and equipment, or the Russians that went to war with several million soldiers).




Returning on topic: I actually agree. I do not Libya war is caused by Gadaffi efforts with gold standard and ignoring IMF and central banking... It is worth to note, that 2 weeks after the start of the NATO invasion, the rebels created their own Central Bank (interestingly, when that happened, the media was still portraying them as ragtag random people with common goal... they founding a Central Bank dispelled that).

unspy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25



View Profile WWW
June 06, 2011, 02:55:45 PM
 #8

On both "World Wars" the entire World wasn't at war... We call WW to large scale wars between two large factions that drags a shit load of allies from each side, which was the case of the cold war, even if the factions didn't directly engaged each other.
To the latest imperialistic attempts, those yes, doesn't seams to fall under the concept of World War.

2 weeks after the start of the NATO invasion, the rebels created their own Central Bank (interestingly, when that happened, the media was still portraying them as ragtag random people with common goal... they founding a Central Bank dispelled that).

The American people are being told Al Qaeda has nuclear bombs hidden across United States
but same time we are buddies with them in Libya all of a sudden? One might ask what is going
on with that.... I think your report of these rebels (read: Al-CIAda) creating their own Bank
only two week after the NATO invasion tell us a lot about what is really going on.

Back to the subject of WW3

Albert Pike received a vision, which he described in a letter that he wrote to Mazzini, dated August 15, 1871. This letter graphically outlined plans for three world wars that were seen as necessary to bring about the so-called "One World Order."  While no conclusive proof exists to show that this letter was ever written.  Nevertheless, the letter is widely quoted and the topic of much discussion. I personally marvel at how accurately it has predicted events that have already taken place.

Following are apparently extracts of the letter, showing how Three World Wars have been planned for many generations.

Quote
"The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the "agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.

The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm."

Those who argue that the terms Nazism and Zionism were not known in 1871 should remember that the Illuminati invented both these movements.  In addition, Communism as an ideology, and as a coined phrase, originates in France during the Revolution.  In 1785, Restif coined the phrase four years before revolution broke out.  Restif and Babeuf, in turn, were influenced by Rousseau - as was the most famous conspirator of them all, Adam Weishaupt. In any case, here is the most famous quote:

Quote
"The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001, world events, and in particular in the Middle East, show a growing unrest and instability between Modern Zionism and the Arabic World. This is completely in line with the call for a Third World War to be fought between the two, and their allies on both sides. This Third World War is still to come, and recent events show us that it is not far off.



- Honest government requires honest money
- Decentralize everything, start with money
"Revolt now or be a debt slave." ~Max Keiser
foxcartier
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
June 06, 2011, 06:09:29 PM
 #9

Quote
While no conclusive proof exists to show that this letter was ever written.
mai77
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


lower transactions fees NOW!


View Profile WWW
April 07, 2013, 11:24:31 PM
 #10



Since the terrorist attacks of Sept 11, 2001, world events, and in particular in the Middle East, show a growing unrest and instability between Modern Zionism and the Arabic World. This is completely in line with the call for a Third World War to be fought between the two, and their allies on both sides.



pretty much obvious!

Bitcoin user: "tax me if you can!"
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!