Bitcoin Forum
May 21, 2024, 02:21:09 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Lowest block hash?  (Read 1840 times)
SgtSpike (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005



View Profile
November 08, 2012, 12:00:44 AM
 #1

Does anyone know what the lowest block hash in the blockchain is?  The one with the most zeroes before it?

Just curious, this isn't for anything truly useful.
Pieter Wuille
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1072
Merit: 1174


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 12:06:47 AM
 #2

00000000000000000ae2dba9951e28a3e6308ac7e9e8536104c503aa772c848f

Found 2 days ago, and would have beaten a difficulty of 100999279974...

I do Bitcoin stuff.
SgtSpike (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005



View Profile
November 08, 2012, 12:13:16 AM
 #3

00000000000000000ae2dba9951e28a3e6308ac7e9e8536104c503aa772c848f

Found 2 days ago, and would have beaten a difficulty of 100999279974...
Wow, that's... more than 33,000 times the current difficulty!

notbad.jpg
Gavin Andresen
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 2216


Chief Scientist


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 02:15:39 AM
 #4

I wonder if that is the smallest sha256 hash ever found for any purpose...

How often do you get the chance to work on a potentially world-changing project?
Yuhfhrh
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100



View Profile
November 08, 2012, 02:17:41 AM
 #5

I wonder if that is the smallest sha256 hash ever found for any purpose...

That would be neat  Cheesy
MysteryMiner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1038


Death to enemies!


View Profile
November 08, 2012, 03:23:15 AM
 #6

00000000000000000ae2dba9951e28a3e6308ac7e9e8536104c503aa772c848f

Found 2 days ago, and would have beaten a difficulty of 100999279974...
I thought that hash consisting from more than half of zeroes would be accidentally found by now.

bc1q59y5jp2rrwgxuekc8kjk6s8k2es73uawprre4j
2GOOD
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 547
Merit: 531


First bits: 12good


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 10:14:26 AM
 #7

00000000000000000ae2dba9951e28a3e6308ac7e9e8536104c503aa772c848f

Found 2 days ago, and would have beaten a difficulty of 100999279974...
Wow, that's... more than 33,000 times the current difficulty!

notbad.jpg

Crazy numbers  Shocked

kjj
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1025



View Profile
November 08, 2012, 12:24:51 PM
 #8

00000000000000000ae2dba9951e28a3e6308ac7e9e8536104c503aa772c848f

Found 2 days ago, and would have beaten a difficulty of 100999279974...
I thought that hash consisting from more than half of zeroes would be accidentally found by now.

2128 is an absurdly large number.  I did the math a couple of months ago, and at that time I think I had figured out that the bitcoin project has managed to do about 268 hashes in 4 years.  That is actually pretty consistent with this lowest hash.

17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs.  You should too.
Pieter Wuille
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1072
Merit: 1174


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 12:34:43 PM
 #9

2128 is an absurdly large number.  I did the math a couple of months ago, and at that time I think I had figured out that the bitcoin project has managed to do about 268 hashes in 4 years.  That is actually pretty consistent with this lowest hash.

We're currently at 268.9897 double-SHA256 hashes.

That lowest hash found a few days ago is to be expected after 268.5558 hashes.

At the current hashrate, a hash with 128 zero bits is expected in about 400 million billion years.

I do Bitcoin stuff.
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
November 08, 2012, 12:50:07 PM
 #10

00000000000000000ae2dba9951e28a3e6308ac7e9e8536104c503aa772c848f

Found 2 days ago, and would have beaten a difficulty of 100999279974...
I thought that hash consisting from more than half of zeroes would be accidentally found by now.

Half is deceptive due to the nature of binary.

In the first half of the digits there are 2^128 possibilities.  Getting all zeroes is one of out 2^128 possibilities the chance of doing that is just as remote as brute forcing a 2^128 private key.  Given the number of hashes attempted so far the odds we would have found a hash with 32 zero prefix is about one in one million quadrillion. 
etotheipi
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1093


Core Armory Developer


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 01:34:53 PM
 #11

FYI, I previously posted on this topic, finding that  block 125,552 had a hash that would've been valid at 36,000,000,000 difficulty.  Apparently block 125,552 has finally be dethroned...


Founder and CEO of Armory Technologies, Inc.
Armory Bitcoin Wallet: Bringing cold storage to the average user!
Only use Armory software signed by the Armory Offline Signing Key (0x98832223)

Please donate to the Armory project by clicking here!    (or donate directly via 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX -- yes, it's a real address!)
Pieter Wuille
Legendary
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 1072
Merit: 1174


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 01:57:45 PM
 #12

FYI, I previously posted on this topic, finding that  block 125,552 had a hash that would've been valid at 36,000,000,000 difficulty.  Apparently block 125,552 has finally be dethroned...

Indeed. It's still number #2, which is impressive.


I do Bitcoin stuff.
MysteryMiner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1038


Death to enemies!


View Profile
November 08, 2012, 03:01:58 PM
 #13

Quote
Half is deceptive due to the nature of binary.

In the first half of the digits there are 2^128 possibilities.  Getting all zeroes is one of out 2^128 possibilities the chance of doing that is just as remote as brute forcing a 2^128 private key.  Given the number of hashes attempted so far the odds we would have found a hash with 32 zero prefix is about one in one million quadrillion.
Yes the half would be 2^128. And not a private 128-bit key, but symmetrical 128-bit key.

I just did not take into account that current number of blocks are way too small to get such result by luck.

bc1q59y5jp2rrwgxuekc8kjk6s8k2es73uawprre4j
TTBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1136
Merit: 1001


View Profile
November 08, 2012, 04:06:57 PM
 #14


Is it possible to know what produced the lowest hash? i.e. f(x) --> lowest hash. What is f(x)?

good judgment comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgment
kjj
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1302
Merit: 1025



View Profile
November 08, 2012, 04:14:46 PM
 #15


Is it possible to know what produced the lowest hash? i.e. f(x) --> lowest hash. What is f(x)?

f(x) is SHA256(SHA256(x)) and x is the block header.

17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs.  You should too.
grau
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 836
Merit: 1021


bits of proof


View Profile WWW
November 08, 2012, 09:33:46 PM
 #16

This one is also neat:

00000000000addd111114dd2a982305a821a532ff77ddf658b9c468ef008033e

its a vanity block Smiley
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!