Losvienleg (OP)
|
|
October 29, 2015, 10:06:15 PM |
|
Today China abrogated the unique child policy, and so now every couple is able to have two children. According to you, will it make the population growth increase ? Until now the curve was less and less high, but maybe it will make the straight climbin curve come back ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
angrykoreaman
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
October 29, 2015, 10:10:30 PM |
|
Perhaps a little bit. It is still expensive to have children nowadays.
|
|
|
|
|
Pentax
|
|
October 30, 2015, 02:51:02 AM |
|
Today China abrogated the unique child policy, and so now every couple is able to have two children. According to you, will it make the population growth increase ? Until now the curve was less and less high, but maybe it will make the straight climbin curve come back ?
sure it will. More kids is more kids.
|
|
|
|
tvbcof
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1276
|
|
October 30, 2015, 03:08:44 AM |
|
Today China abrogated the unique child policy, and so now every couple is able to have two children. According to you, will it make the population growth increase ? Until now the curve was less and less high, but maybe it will make the straight climbin curve come back ?
sure it will. More kids is more kids. We (us 'technocrats', greenies, and corporate shareholders) can have ' the best of all worlds' by having kids be expensive as hell and having 50% of them being to fucked up to themselves eventually reproduce. They are thus 'sustainable kids.' With enough vaccinations and GMO food it will be rather easy to have 50% of kids end up autistic, diabetic, LGBT, etc. There is a downside however. Back in the day, big families were desirable because of infant mortality (and additional social and economic factors.) In the 'new world' people might be inclined to keep trying to have a relatively normal and healthy kid and that itself could result in larger families. But as long as larger families are highly profitable the glass is at least half full. Before Obamacare there was another stick in the gears. One cannot get blood from a turnip. By making more well off people pay the ridiculously overpriced medical expenses for anyone who is damaged by corp food/pharma/fda/cdc and etc, that little problem got ironed out. Now the game is on!
|
sig spam anywhere and self-moderated threads on the pol&soc board are for losers.
|
|
|
lumeire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1009
Next-Gen Trade Racing Metaverse
|
|
October 30, 2015, 03:09:16 AM |
|
China's youth population is no longer enough to support the whole of their labor force once the earlier generations retire. That gap is what's gonna slow their economy down. It's about time they remove that policy or at least, lighten it up.
|
|
|
|
kydranel
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
October 30, 2015, 03:11:09 AM |
|
The reason might be is that they are now the most populated areas in the world but are economically progressive . for me it help the lessen of there population. Its nice if other countries could be disciplined that way. Because population now adays is really a problem in some countries. Its for economical reasons.
|
|
|
|
okae
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1401
Merit: 1008
northern exposure
|
|
October 30, 2015, 12:06:47 PM |
|
i think that the reason about why they did it is because they are looking at his neighbor's, the India, they are growing up so faster, and they are scared about it, i mean that they want to continue with his "empire" in the world, so the way to do that is to reproduce faster, otherwise i can't understand why they did it.
|
|
|
|
vero
|
|
October 30, 2015, 12:12:17 PM |
|
The chinese people only give birth to one child ,if they need a second one ,just pay a fine. But now,the new china child policy said if both family is the only child, they can have two, need not pay a fine.
|
|
|
|
Avarosan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
October 30, 2015, 02:15:45 PM |
|
So do they have to pay a fine for a third child?
|
|
|
|
Losvienleg (OP)
|
|
November 02, 2015, 07:28:28 PM |
|
Perhaps a little bit. It is still expensive to have children nowadays.
If you think as this, your civilisation will never progress. Look what's happening in my country actually (in Europe) : autochtonous people have not a lot of kids (no, even if 2,1 kids per women is the highest rate in Europe, that's really low !) but Muslims invaders have a lot. If people countinue to think like this, our race will extingish.
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 1217
|
|
November 04, 2015, 02:47:13 PM |
|
This will never work. The Chinese attitude towards having children is not that positive, especially in the urban areas. That is why they are having fertility rate of 0.80 children per woman in Hong Kong (for comparison, the same in Russia is 1.77 and in Germany it is 1.41). The Chinese are too much money-minded and they don't have ethnic groups such as the Amish (USA), Old Believers (Russia), and Laestadians (Finland) among whom large families are the norm.
|
|
|
|
|
hoian0809
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1020
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 06, 2015, 08:53:14 AM |
|
China has achieved a state where it can just scrap the compulsory family planning policy. Let the people decide how many children they can afford and manage.
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 1217
|
|
November 08, 2015, 05:52:04 AM |
|
China has achieved a state where it can just scrap the compulsory family planning policy. Let the people decide how many children they can afford and manage.
Their strategy was a very successful one, when compared with their neighbors (say India). In the 1960s, the Chinese standard of living was much worse than that in India. But when the population growth slowed, they were able to divert their resources to education and healthcare, thereby improving the living standards considerably. On the other hand, the Indian living standards declined, as the government never gave any importance to population control and family planning.
|
|
|
|
Pierre 2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1358
|
|
November 13, 2015, 12:49:52 PM |
|
It won't really have huge impact because it is really expensive investment to have kids in countries like China. I think they will keep making 1 baby in most families, but riches 2.
|
|
|
|
|