What Happen If Gambling was not introduced?

[Eastwind]

Gambling created many problems, anger, addiction, and debt.

The creators of Satoshi Mines and Bustabit, damn, they're rich.

The creators of Satoshi Mines and Bustabit are rich because they provide a service to gamblers. If their sites do not get hacked, they will remain rich. I have no problem with that. For the gamblers, they know they will lose. But they just want to try their lucky and get fun out of it.

[michinzx]

Gambling created many problems, anger, addiction, and debt.

The creators of Satoshi Mines and Bustabit, damn, they're rich.

there's a lot more to gambling than just those sites, i guarantee the big casinos (real life ones) see as much money trade hands in one night than these bitcoin casinos might in a weeks or even a month. not only are there dozens of people playing in these casinos, a fair number of them bring a fair amount of money with them, and there is nothing like a "faucet" like online casinos might have. in fact, many table games, such as blackjack and hold em have a small fee to play a hand.

[klf]

Gambling created many problems, anger, addiction, and debt.

The creators of Satoshi Mines and Bustabit, damn, they're rich.

That is true. Who ever created these gambling games or running these games or casinos are quite happy but who ever plays these games they will be in a lot of problems. Every one knows this fact that, they can't make a big money out of gambling but still they will addict to these games and ruin their life. If there was no gambling, there will be something else to pass the time.

[knightkon]

I am sorry but I personally do not think that that would ever have happened. Gambling dates back to the stone age where they would battle for women, food, etc.  From there rules, laws and just plain interest has turned gambling from the prizes needing to be fought over, into prizes that we can do with out.  I promotions all of the time and though mine are not considered gambling, I get the ideas from those places that do use them for gambling.

[Erza]

Gambling created many problems, anger, addiction, and debt.

The creators of Satoshi Mines and Bustabit, damn, they're rich.

Why should these two that you mentioned? You lose a lot there? There are still many gambling site that is rich enough too because most of gambling casino will rich, it is just matter of time when will they be thats why they keep on promote their site giving a giveaways so their site will not die and btw gambling only if you can afford so you wont face that problems of depression

[plost24]

if gambling was not intoduced in this time it will be very hard to collect bitcoin because it will be no signature campaign and people will not lose there money and don't get angry and stressed from the result of there picks so the life will be a little easy for someone and hard for others

[Winalunt]

if gambling was not intoduced in this time it will be very hard to collect bitcoin because it will be no signature campaign

Do you think bitmixer, coinut, bit-x ,coinoindex and many other signature campaigns on forum are a casino and promoting gambling ?
Bitcoin Gambling is just an asset to BItCOIN, to attract more people into it. SIG's have nothing to do with it.

[n2004al]

If Gambling was not introduced then many people have to do the hard work for earning money.

If gambling was not introduced all the gamblers would have a wealthy and happy life, would have all the money ended at the pocket of the owners of casinos and online gambling sites, would have did to many other fantastic things with those money (maybe help the people in need), would be safe in their health (mental and physical) and would have much more time in their disposition to pass with their family, their friends and with every other person which gave them pleasure.

As for the earnings in gambling, even if they would exist (impossible thing) it will be better to do hard work than gamble. Work give everything while gambling not only give nothing but the most of times give bad.

[StevenLiang]

if gambling was not intoduced in this time it will be very hard to collect bitcoin because it will be no signature campaign

Do you think bitmixer, coinut, bit-x ,coinoindex and many other signature campaigns on forum are a casino and promoting gambling ?
Bitcoin Gambling is just an asset to BItCOIN, to attract more people into it. SIG's have nothing to do with it.

They are nothing to do with signature campaign.
Signature campaign is for promoting their service or business.

[98problems]

there would surely be less people interested in bitcoins then as now gambling is available without any licences for casinos what makes the price grow as people want to play anonymously

[plost24]

if gambling was not intoduced in this time it will be very hard to collect bitcoin because it will be no signature campaign

Do you think bitmixer, coinut, bit-x ,coinoindex and many other signature campaigns on forum are a casino and promoting gambling ?
Bitcoin Gambling is just an asset to BItCOIN, to attract more people into it. SIG's have nothing to do with it.

They are nothing to do with signature campaign.
Signature campaign is for promoting their service or business.

If there is no gambling so we will not have so much signature campaign and the price will be so lower and no place  for so many membre and that why i said that collecting bitcoin will be hard that what i meant and maybe it will not be signature compaign who know?

[StevenLiang]

if gambling was not intoduced in this time it will be very hard to collect bitcoin because it will be no signature campaign

Do you think bitmixer, coinut, bit-x ,coinoindex and many other signature campaigns on forum are a casino and promoting gambling ?
Bitcoin Gambling is just an asset to BItCOIN, to attract more people into it. SIG's have nothing to do with it.

They are nothing to do with signature campaign.
Signature campaign is for promoting their service or business.

If there is no gambling so we will not have so much signature campaign and the price will be so lower and no place  for so many membre and that why i said that collecting bitcoin will be hard that what i meant and maybe it will not be signature compaign who know?

That's make sense, but signature campaign itself is not booming because of gambling sites. Although many of signature campaign is from gambling sites, there's always posibble in future some new services signature campaign can be more many than gambling signature campaign.

[phibay]

If Gambling was not introduced then many people have to do the hard work for earning money.

if gambling wasn't introduced, there will be less broken people in the world, both in real and virtual world
but i won't be here on bitcointalk.org if gambling wasn't introduce i came here because of gambling hehe

[roadbits]

there would surely be less people interested in bitcoins then as now gambling is available without any licences for casinos what makes the price grow as people want to play anonymously

Yes that is true. As of now bitcoins are used mostly in gambling and other gray businesses so if there was no gambling then by now bitcoins might have disappeared. Because of no tractability feature in bitcoin there are some many unlicensed gambling houses are running online. I feel if there was no gambling then world would have been more peaceful than now.

[Arcteryx]

If gambling was never introduced to society we would not be in a world of debit. The lottery corporations are richer than the government and a lot of second and third world countries. But they don't redistribute it to anyone, they pocket the profits.

[paka]

If gambling was never introduced to society we would not be in a world of debit. The lottery corporations are richer than the government and a lot of second and third world countries. But they don't redistribute it to anyone, they pocket the profits.

Then the world you live in is a very small one..

[Decoded]

If gambling was never introduced, there would be alot less homeless people. There should still be the homeless, but alot less. People would be much better off, although some people's lives should be much more boring than today.

So which one would you rather? Emotional wealth or financial wealth?

[apriyani420]

first of all people would have more money as they would loose less, also bitcoin wouldnt be that interesting for most users as now its anonymous

[European Central Bank]

There would be many more happy people walking around. And a few sad ones who don't have the chance to exploit them.

[BTCevo]

if gambling was not intoduced in this time it will be very hard to collect bitcoin because it will be no signature campaign and people will not lose there money and don't get angry and stressed from the result of there picks so the life will be a little easy for someone and hard for others

Is there any connection between gambling was not introduced and hard to collect bitcoin? I dont think you are making any sense here. Before bitcoin is even founded people already gamble and they still can get money from gambling too or some of them lose so it has nothing to do with earning bitcoin here. The campaign is made for the purpose of promotion not for earning actually but when bitcoin is found they make changing by paying us to help them promote