What Happen If Gambling was not introduced?

[Superhitech]

if gambling was not intoduced in this time it will be very hard to collect bitcoin because it will be no signature campaign and people will not lose there money and don't get angry and stressed from the result of there picks so the life will be a little easy for someone and hard for others

Is there any connection between gambling was not introduced and hard to collect bitcoin? I dont think you are making any sense here. Before bitcoin is even founded people already gamble and they still can get money from gambling too or some of them lose so it has nothing to do with earning bitcoin here. The campaign is made for the purpose of promotion not for earning actually but when bitcoin is found they make changing by paying us to help them promote

I think that he means that without gambling, there wouldn't be many signature campaigns to join as most of the campaigns are promoting gambling sites. Without any gambling sites to promote in our signature, there would be a lot less variety of signature campaigns, making it harder to find work to earn bitcoin.

[Winalunt]

if gambling was not intoduced in this time it will be very hard to collect bitcoin because it will be no signature campaign and people will not lose there money and don't get angry and stressed from the result of there picks so the life will be a little easy for someone and hard for others

Is there any connection between gambling was not introduced and hard to collect bitcoin? I dont think you are making any sense here. Before bitcoin is even founded people already gamble and they still can get money from gambling too or some of them lose so it has nothing to do with earning bitcoin here. The campaign is made for the purpose of promotion not for earning actually but when bitcoin is found they make changing by paying us to help them promote

I think that he means that without gambling, there wouldn't be many signature campaigns to join as most of the campaigns are promoting gambling sites. Without any gambling sites to promote in our signature, there would be a lot less variety of signature campaigns, making it harder to find work to earn bitcoin.

That is not a valid reason as i dont think more than 1% of bitcoin users are making coins from signature campaign's. specially Gambling sig's
sig's are not work/job it's just a promotion event with free coupon's.

[Junko]

if gambling was not intoduced in this time it will be very hard to collect bitcoin because it will be no signature campaign and people will not lose there money and don't get angry and stressed from the result of there picks so the life will be a little easy for someone and hard for others

Is there any connection between gambling was not introduced and hard to collect bitcoin? I dont think you are making any sense here. Before bitcoin is even founded people already gamble and they still can get money from gambling too or some of them lose so it has nothing to do with earning bitcoin here. The campaign is made for the purpose of promotion not for earning actually but when bitcoin is found they make changing by paying us to help them promote

Well, I think he is just being facetious, ie. just kidding around/not serious. The two emoticons in his post should have been your clue.

[Superhitech]

if gambling was not intoduced in this time it will be very hard to collect bitcoin because it will be no signature campaign and people will not lose there money and don't get angry and stressed from the result of there picks so the life will be a little easy for someone and hard for others

Is there any connection between gambling was not introduced and hard to collect bitcoin? I dont think you are making any sense here. Before bitcoin is even founded people already gamble and they still can get money from gambling too or some of them lose so it has nothing to do with earning bitcoin here. The campaign is made for the purpose of promotion not for earning actually but when bitcoin is found they make changing by paying us to help them promote

I think that he means that without gambling, there wouldn't be many signature campaigns to join as most of the campaigns are promoting gambling sites. Without any gambling sites to promote in our signature, there would be a lot less variety of signature campaigns, making it harder to find work to earn bitcoin.

That is not a valid reason as i dont think more than 1% of bitcoin users are making coins from signature campaign's. specially Gambling sig's
sig's are not work/job it's just a promotion event with free coupon's.

To the contrary, I think many bitcoin users are making bitcoin from signature campaigns. Most of the forum is wearing a signature, and there are very many active users on this forum. While people may not be making a large amount of bitcoin, I do think that many people make some bitcoin from signature campaigns, especially gambling signatures as most of the signature campaigns are promoting a gambling site, for example, you and me are both wearing signatures for a gambling site.

[adaseb]

If Gambling was not introduced then many people have to do the hard work for earning money.

I am pretty sure the opposite is true. Most people lose money gambling. So if gambling never existed or was illegal people would have more money. It wouldn't be a form of addiction.

The casinos however would lose some money.

[babylon99]

What Happen If Gambling was not introduced?

Somebody else will introduced it .

[gampher]

So if gambling never existed or was illegal people would have more money. It wouldn't be a form of addiction.

A different addiction would have existed then to lose money.

The casinos however would lose some money.

how can casino's exist if there is no gambling ?

[Eastwind]

If Gambling was not introduced then many people have to do the hard work for earning money.

I am pretty sure the opposite is true. Most people lose money gambling. So if gambling never existed or was illegal people would have more money. It wouldn't be a form of addiction.

The casinos however would lose some money.

Gambling just redistribute the money people own. It transfer the money from most gamblers to very few gamblers and casinos. Casino earn the money by providing a legit business, not different from other service industry. A few gamblers make some profit and are happy. But even for the losing majority, he played the game.

[BAGOBO]

Positive side : There will be less crime that cause by gambling, many people will having healthy economic so it will prevent someone for lending etc

Negative side : Country's income will be decrease, there will be more unemployee , There will be less entertainment

[Superhitech]

If Gambling was not introduced then many people have to do the hard work for earning money.

I am pretty sure the opposite is true. Most people lose money gambling. So if gambling never existed or was illegal people would have more money. It wouldn't be a form of addiction.

The casinos however would lose some money.

True, but maybe if gambling was not introduced, people would seek out alternate methods of entertainment that would possibly more harmful. It's unfortunately in human nature.

[StevenLiang]

Positive side : There will be less crime that cause by gambling, many people will having healthy economic so it will prevent someone for lending etc

Negative side : Country's income will be decrease, there will be more unemployee , There will be less entertainment

It's maybe true or maybe not true.
Gambling is not introduced, it is from human nature greedy.

Most people who say gambling is for entertainment and just for fun, do not got addicted with gambling and really thing "that activity" (gambling) is just for fun.

But when greedy comes, they start to think that is a way to make a money. But it is not.
Too many bad history from addicted gamblers. And because mostly new people will got addicted on gambling games (human nature greedy), some goverments or some community really prohibited gambling. (and it's quite right)

If you think it just for entertainment or for fun, surely you can find another place for have fun with your time.

[Eastwind]

That is not a valid reason as i dont think more than 1% of bitcoin users are making coins from signature campaign's. specially Gambling sig's
sig's are not work/job it's just a promotion event with free coupon's.

Although less than 1% of bitcon users are making coins from signature campaigns, more that 1% post in this forum are posted by campaigners. The percentage could even reach 10%. If you count the post in this thread, more than 30% are posted by campaigners.
Signature campaign is effective. That is why there are so many bitcoin casinos advertise here.

[CoinSkipper]

The world would be a much better place, but some people's lives would be much duller. Gambling is a great deal of fun, although it is bad for your wallet.

So it depends on what you want. More money or a fun experience.

[adaseb]

The world would be a much better place, but some people's lives would be much duller. Gambling is a great deal of fun, although it is bad for your wallet.

So it depends on what you want. More money or a fun experience.

I don't think it would change the world. In many countries and religions gambling and alcohol are prohibited right now. But if you want to gamble you need to travel to somewhere else.

[BitmoreCoin]

Positive side : There will be less crime that cause by gambling, many people will having healthy economic so it will prevent someone for lending etc

Negative side : Country's income will be decrease, there will be more unemployee , There will be less entertainment

Gambling just redistributes the wealth of the society. It does not create new jobs. The gambling jobs will go elsewhere such as tourism, online game etc. Tourism and online gaming are also entertainment.

[Patatas]

There will be a other way out to make money in short terms without hard working.On the brighter side,people would actually be not dependent on shortcuts rather hard work and dedication.Chances are it might even reduce the frauds/scams/loots which we face nowadays as a influence of gambling.

[Winalunt]

That is not a valid reason as i dont think more than 1% of bitcoin users are making coins from signature campaign's. specially Gambling sig's
sig's are not work/job it's just a promotion event with free coupon's.

Although less than 1% of bitcon users are making coins from signature campaigns, more that 1% post in this forum are posted by campaigners. The percentage could even reach 10%. If you count the post in this thread, more than 30% are posted by campaigners.
Signature campaign is effective. That is why there are so many bitcoin casinos advertise here.

Yeah, but saying without gambling there would be no sig's and very hard to earn bitcoins is baseless and also not true.

[Sir_lagsalot]

Gambling is a source of entertainment and grief. Some people would be sad, some people would be happy. To the sane people, it's a source of entertainment, so if gambling wasn't introduced, their lives would be much less lively, or consumed by something else. For the insane, they'd gamble their lives away, so if there was no such thing as gambling, their life would be able to move on.

It depends on who you are, and your perspective of life.

[futurebit640]

What Happen If Gambling was not introduced?

Somebody else will introduced it .

I think you should read the question correctly. The question is not who has introduced gambling but he is asking what will happen if gambling itself what not introduced.

I think world will be a more peaceful if gambling was not introduced. Many people think that gambling is a tool to make easy money but it is a easy to tool to lose all your money very fast.

[victoryboy]

If gambling was not introduced life could be more easy and simple.Many people say gambling is a source of fun and entertainment but this is till some point and then start addiction or some people begin to think it is easy way to get living or make lot of money in short time.That is the point when starts problems.