Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 03:51:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2015-11-03] Reddit Bitcoin Censorship in Focus as 30 CEOs Join Roger Ver’s AMA  (Read 446 times)
OmegaStarScream (OP)
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3458
Merit: 6099



View Profile
November 03, 2015, 06:40:19 PM
 #1

Over the past few months, Reddit bitcoin moderators including Theymos, who controls major bitcoin forums and discussion panels such as Bitcointalk.org and Bitcoin.org have censored any discussion of bitcoin XT, proposals of bigger blocks and the censorship itself.

Continue reading at : http://cointelegraph.com/news/115545/reddit-bitcoin-censorship-in-focus-as-30-ceos-join-roger-vers-ama

█▀▀▀











█▄▄▄
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
e
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
█████████████
████████████▄███
██▐███████▄█████▀
█████████▄████▀
███▐████▄███▀
████▐██████▀
█████▀█████
███████████▄
████████████▄
██▄█████▀█████▄
▄█████████▀█████▀
███████████▀██▀
████▀█████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
c.h.
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
▀▀▀█











▄▄▄█
▄██████▄▄▄
█████████████▄▄
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███████████████
███░░█████████
███▌▐█████████
█████████████
███████████▀
██████████▀
████████▀
▀██▀▀
1714146683
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714146683

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714146683
Reply with quote  #2

1714146683
Report to moderator
1714146683
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714146683

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714146683
Reply with quote  #2

1714146683
Report to moderator
1714146683
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714146683

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714146683
Reply with quote  #2

1714146683
Report to moderator
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714146683
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714146683

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714146683
Reply with quote  #2

1714146683
Report to moderator
Republic of Coin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 03, 2015, 07:24:15 PM
 #2

We need the block size to be at least 2 MB early next year when bitcoin becomes more popular.

There are many ways to implement larger block size. There should be active discussion in many places.
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3008


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
November 04, 2015, 01:35:11 AM
 #3

The more the merrier and the sooner this stranglehold over some of the most important communication platforms is smashed the better. Their users aren't a bunch of junior school kids who need shielding from big bad scary ideas.
Carlton Banks
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3430
Merit: 3071



View Profile
November 04, 2015, 04:04:40 AM
 #4

The more the merrier and the sooner this stranglehold over some of the most important communication platforms is smashed the better. Their users aren't a bunch of junior school kids who need shielding from big bad scary ideas.

Although I agree, I understand the intention. Mike Hearn wants to use the blocksize issue to take over the keys to bitcoin's github commits, and has cheerfully announced his intentions to remove all that pesky monetary freedom, pseudonymity, decentralisation etc, both recently and in the past.

More transaction volume is needed, and bigger blocks will be needed one way or another. But choosing XT and Hearn sacrifices everything that makes Bitcoin what it is, including (intrinsically) what makes it so valuable.

Vires in numeris
meono
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 04, 2015, 05:39:21 AM
 #5

The more the merrier and the sooner this stranglehold over some of the most important communication platforms is smashed the better. Their users aren't a bunch of junior school kids who need shielding from big bad scary ideas.

Although I agree, I understand the intention. Mike Hearn wants to use the blocksize issue to take over the keys to bitcoin's github commits, and has cheerfully announced his intentions to remove all that pesky monetary freedom, pseudonymity, decentralisation etc, both recently and in the past.

More transaction volume is needed, and bigger blocks will be needed one way or another. But choosing XT and Hearn sacrifices everything that makes Bitcoin what it is, including (intrinsically) what makes it so valuable.

Still stuck your head up your ass i see..
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!