How to check post quality?

[Djisamsoe]

Is there any option to check quality of post that i write?

I have seen in "digital goods" section information that there exist script to check this. But I'm not sure if it showing the true value.

What is most important in post to get a good score from forum staff?

[ranochigo]

There isn't a way to check post quality as it is rather subjective. The boards that you posted in does also represent your post quality. For example, posting too much in offtopic or alternate currency forums would indicate some sign of spamming. Generally, if you give lots of useful information in your post and aren't one liners, you are good to go. bctalkaccountpricer.info does provide a tool to let users estimate the post quality though.

IMO, your post quality is slightly below average. You have been posting too much in games and rounds.

[achow101]

There are websites which attempt to check your post quality, but as Ranochigo said, it is all subjective. The site I made, bctalkaccountpricer.info, uses post lengths without quotes. But, post length does not always indicate good posts. Someone can just post random crap but if it were really long, my site would count it is a good post. Unfortunately, there is no objective way to judge post quality and no way to do it well with a simple script.

[Sturgeon]

Is there any option to check quality of post that i write?

I have seen in "digital goods" section information that there exist script to check this. But I'm not sure if it showing the true value.

What is most important in post to get a good score from forum staff?

you can ceck with this service
http://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/

but not 100% perfect, you must ceck 1 by 1 to ensure that

[DaddyMonsi]

Depends on how you define post quality. A post maybe a few words only but the content says it all, while a post may reach 75 characters but its full of crap.

[JumperX]

Is there any option to check quality of post that i write?

I have seen in "digital goods" section information that there exist script to check this. But I'm not sure if it showing the true value.

What is most important in post to get a good score from forum staff?

you can ceck with this service
http://www.bctalkaccountpricer.info/

but not 100% perfect, you must ceck 1 by 1 to ensure that

third party sites doesnt really accurately checking the posts quality as only human can check it. third party sites only check the number of characters to determine the post quality IMO

[Inkvor]

Is there any option to check quality of post that i write?

No ,even if you write in terrible grammar ,that only shows you are not native.

I have seen in "digital goods" section information that there exist script to check this. But I'm not sure if it showing the true value.

The script gives a A+ score to posts longer than 80 characters...even if it is a combination of 2 private keys.

What is most important in post to get a good score from forum staff?

That is the most iportant thing ,Dont post for the sake of staff. Post if you are interested in the subject and have smething that might contribute to the discussion.
There is nothing like good score from staf....etc.

[notlist3d]

I really don't know why lot of (almost all) signature campaigns do not accept posting in alternate currency. I know it does relevant to bitcoin but still can promote the content they want too. And I think that posting a lot in alternate currency doesn't mean that your post quality is bad as long as it is informative then it's totally fine

Each campaign makes a decision on what makes the most sense for them to advertise in.  Normally they will not pay for a forum that really does not advertise for them.  So assuming it's a bitcoin product in your signature... alternative currency might not be best match on advertising.

The worst in my eyes is off topic.  No one should be getting paid in there.  With post's like what is your last drink... its full of crap posts in my opinion.

But as far as quality of posts only you really know.  Unless someone else goes through your posts such as a campaign manager.  Being on topic and helpful is really what you need to be when a constructive post.   As a general rule if it's one sentence chances are it's not constructive, but a few answers will be even when small.

But one liners and small posts like "+1" or "I agree" are the worst type of posts and stand out pretty easily when looking for constructive posts.

[Amph]

from my point of view any post that is on topic and not heavily reiterated but based on your experience and opinion is a good post

there is no need to perform wall of text and in deep insight all the time

one thing, if you have doubt about your post quality, you known that somehow they are a bit garbage

[Mickeyb]

All those scripts that exist and that are checking quality of posts and accounts are kit accurate at all. They are just checking the length of posts and in this way judging the quality.

Only way to check for quality of posts and accounts is checking manually post history of the users.

[erikalui]

There are some tools that can check the post quality and give a rating depending on the readability of the content. When I write an article, I use this website: charactercounttool.com as it notifies me if the content is a quality post or not depending on the level whether school, college or university.

If you are talking with regards to the quality of posts with regards to spam, each MOD has his/her own POV to decide that and admins as well check this with regards to whether the post is on topic or not and sometimes when people go off topic and deviate the topic, the users with signature get banned while those without are ignored many times. It's also different with regards to campaign managers.

[SFR10]

Is there any option to check quality of post that i write?
- Yes there are few websites that have an enabled script that checks the quality however have this in mind that all of them have false results as you could just post long post and it says your posting quality is excellent which the measuring system on it is completely wrong and shouldn't be taken seriously at all


What is most important in post to get a good score from forum staff?
- The answer is very simple, to be constructive to the topic but also do have this in mind that many post same replies all over the thread even though the answer has been answered already and in this case even if your post is constructive to the topic, it doesn't have any value therefore no contribution from your side to the forum which brings you to the result of post to count or rather just another spam post meaning in other words low score in terms of post quality

[Astargath]

Look at the quality in this post, after the first post of ranochigo all of the others are just a copy and they are all saying the same thing spamming for their signature campaign, pretty sad.

[Amph]

Look at the quality in this post, after the first post of ranochigo all of the others are just a copy and they are all saying the same thing spamming for their signature campaign, pretty sad.

no-sense, he didn't say what i've said, so you're trolling , everyone is entitled to post his opinion, and the other are simply doing so

[Slark]

THERE ARE NO TOOL WHICH CAN CHECK QUALITY OF THE POST. PERIOD.

How this tool will check context, emotions, information and humor in your post? All that post quality checker bots do is to count words in your posts.

Even the post with one word can be helpful sometimes.

[devil11]

To check the quality of post, write true and related to the post. Not write such anything which is not related to post, so will be a good quality ! 

[Tstar]

You can on users' stats and you see where they post the most. Then you go and check what they write. That's a good check.
Regarding posts themselves that is very subjective.

[DiamondCardz]

Okay, here's the simplest thing I use to see if a poster is of decent quality. Not having one of these points in one of your posts doesn't make you a bad poster, but if it's continuous then it's bad:

1. Are their posts longer than 1 line? Of course lines are varying lengths depending on screen size. My screen is quite long so usually I class about 80% of a line on my screen as "1 line". If their posts usually aren't, they're probably just spam.

2. Do they contribute to discourse in the thread? As in, do they actually add points or is it just stuff like "+1" or "I agree"? If not, it's probably just spam.

That's it.

[bill gator]

Just follow some general guidelines and you'll have fantastic post quality.

Spread your posts throughout multiple boards and consistently post throughout the week. Keep your posts longer than 250 characters and make sure they're relevant to the thread!

[gkv9]

I personally don't think how one can classify themselves from others when it comes to "quality" of your posts...
It ain't possible for anyone to exactly determine the quality of posts as different topics will have different replies, and based on theory, mostly one will find same answers and replies to what they said, so not possible at all...

You just need to post anything relevant to the topic you are discussing about, and you are good to go...