Public list of yobit spammers(this one's gonna be long boys)

[ilvbtc]

Once again and it's just for the 'list makers' like mexxer-2 and XinXan.
How come you didn't notice this senior profile(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=174973;sa=showPosts)?
Did you find more quality in those than in mine before you released your lists?

[mexxer-2]

Once again and it's just for the 'list makers' like mexxer-2 and XinXan.
How come you didn't notice this senior profile(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=174973;sa=showPosts)?
Did you find more quality in those than in mine before you released your lists?

You're free to report them here. At any rate, I believe I made myself clear when I said I will not be actively updating the list as hilarious is their new campaign manager, so report them to him :

As the campaign has stated that it will be keeping the post quality in check now onwards and any new spammer I find will be personally PMed and added to the list, I will be keeping the spammers' list as a shame list and ban consideration for mods/admins but from now on and this thread will be majorly used to display the next in line spam campaigns which currently seem to be bit-vest and 777coin(nearly the same) and bit-mixer.

Lastly, his posts do seem more constructive than yours when I added you to the list.

[notlist3d]

Would not have noticed this one if not for a stupid comment about robbing bank as a joke on quick cash.    But look into the following:

User: zodiac3011 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=221888
Posts: I have never seen one like this.  Currently entire first page of posts every single one is one line post.  And some very small to - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=221888;sa=showPosts

Others can chime in what they think.  I thought it might be a candidate for this yobit thread.

[XinXan]

Once again and it's just for the 'list makers' like mexxer-2 and XinXan.
How come you didn't notice this senior profile(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=174973;sa=showPosts)?
Did you find more quality in those than in mine before you released your lists?

You're free to report them here. At any rate, I believe I made myself clear when I said I will not be actively updating the list as hilarious is their new campaign manager, so report them to him :

As the campaign has stated that it will be keeping the post quality in check now onwards and any new spammer I find will be personally PMed and added to the list, I will be keeping the spammers' list as a shame list and ban consideration for mods/admins but from now on and this thread will be majorly used to display the next in line spam campaigns which currently seem to be bit-vest and 777coin(nearly the same) and bit-mixer.

Lastly, his posts do seem more constructive than yours when I added you to the list.

Basically what mexxer said. It seems like you think I was hunting you or something, I bumped into your posts by accident, I knew about this thread and reported you here and anyone else who I randomly encountered.

[Sir_lagsalot]

Great list. Just a question staff, do you guys judge harsher against people with signatures than people without? I've been watching a few people who have been posting frequently without a signature, but as soon as they applied the signature, they haven't posted since... Banned, maybe?

[GannickusX]

Great list. Just a question staff, do you guys judge harsher against people with signatures than people without? I've been watching a few people who have been posting frequently without a signature, but as soon as they applied the signature, they haven't posted since... Banned, maybe?

Yes they judge people wearing signatures differently than people not wearing them. Although some of them say everyone will be judged by the same rules in the end it's not really true.

[notlist3d]

Great list. Just a question staff, do you guys judge harsher against people with signatures than people without? I've been watching a few people who have been posting frequently without a signature, but as soon as they applied the signature, they haven't posted since... Banned, maybe?

Yes they judge people wearing signatures differently than people not wearing them. Although some of them say everyone will be judged by the same rules in the end it's not really true.

It is fair though to judge at a different level.  One could say someone with a sig has a financial gain for having more posts, so there is a reason for posting.  And sadly a lot of the newbie ones (like yobit) seem to bring out a lot of spammers for a little pay.  It's not we think it's happening it's face look at this thread of spammers.

When you wear a sig make sure to not do one liners or usless offtopic over and over.  And it's fair I acccept my posts are judged harder as I wear a sig.  If you want to post "+1", "I agree", etc do not wear a sig it's simple.

[hilariousandco]

Once again and it's just for the 'list makers' like mexxer-2 and XinXan.
How come you didn't notice this senior profile(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=174973;sa=showPosts)?
Did you find more quality in those than in mine before you released your lists?

You're free to report them here. At any rate, I believe I made myself clear when I said I will not be actively updating the list as hilarious is their new campaign manager, so report them to him.

He's just given me access to kick people off but waiting for him to give me a list of all the members on the campaign then will start going through them all. Want to PM them all and give 'em a warning to improve first before I start kicking them all off because most of the campaign will be gone otherwise. You can still keep updating this thread if you wish as I'll go through it soon.

Great list. Just a question staff, do you guys judge harsher against people with signatures than people without? I've been watching a few people who have been posting frequently without a signature, but as soon as they applied the signature, they haven't posted since... Banned, maybe?

Not really, but if you've got a signature you're often motivated to post more with less quality and the longer they go on getting paid the number of posts increases and the quality decreases so they get easier to spot. People often try farm accounts without signatures as well and they shoduldn't get away with posting crap just because they haven't got a signature.

[ilvbtc]

Once again and it's just for the 'list makers' like mexxer-2 and XinXan.
How come you didn't notice this senior profile(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=174973;sa=showPosts)?
Did you find more quality in those than in mine before you released your lists?

Want to PM them all and give 'em a warning to improve first before I start kicking them all off because most of the campaign will be gone otherwise.

Certainly nice move/method as it's a way of giving them a 'chance' to improve.
But,just a thought,did not the ones like me get deprived of this 'chance' now as I was already removed from the campaign?

[botany]

A few more.

i m possible	Posts
SpontaneousDiarrhea	Posts
ridery99	Posts
butragenjo	Posts
USER211	Posts
Blackmet	Posts
BitcoinPaw	Posts

[mexxer-2]

-snip-

Thanks, might wanna PM them to hilarious as well, he's kicking the spammers out.

[hilariousandco]

Most of those aren't even on yobit. I've messaged everyone on the campaign and told them they have a week to improve or they're getting kicked off so hopefully that will motivate them.

[ilvbtc]

He's just given me access to kick people off but waiting for him to give me a list of all the members on the campaign then will start going through them all. Want to PM them all and give 'em a warning to improve first before I start kicking them all off
[/quote]

Once again.............Certainly nice move/method as it's a way of giving them a 'chance' to improve.
But,just a thought,did not the ones like me get deprived of this 'chance' now as I was already removed from the campaign?
Can I expect a reply from hilarious or yobit ?

[Blue_Tiger73]

We really need a local spammer. A lot of spammers post in local. We need to do something about it. Most people don't care because it doesn't affect them.

[Bardman]

We really need a local spammer. A lot of spammers post in local. We need to do something about it. Most people don't care because it doesn't affect them.

You realize your posts are pretty spammy too, right? You are posting like 20 posts in bursts and most of them are pretty shitty if you ask me.

[Windpower]

Why are you telling the Bitcointalk community. Tell YoBit. Or in fact now, tell hilariousandco.

[mexxer-2]

I've created a serious test thread to lure them in. The results are scientific, disturbing.

Lol they're coming like bees come to honey

Oh and hiarious, time to ban them+exclude them from campaign, preferably the first one:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=556317
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=556316

More than 3 topics' last post was by them, just... spammy

[hilariousandco]

I've created a serious test thread to lure them in. The results are scientific, disturbing.

Booted them. Almost certainly the same user.

[ColderThanIce]

Booted them. Almost certainly the same user.

I was wondering if they were the same user, all three accounts seemed to have identical posting styles. Thanks for handling them!

[ilvbtc]

He's just given me access to kick people off but waiting for him to give me a list of all the members on the campaign then will start going through them all. Want to PM them all and give 'em a warning to improve first before I start kicking them all off

Once again.............Certainly nice move/method as it's a way of giving them a 'chance' to improve.
But,just a thought,did not the ones like me get deprived of this 'chance' now as I was already removed from the campaign?
Can I expect a reply from hilarious or yobit ?
[/quote]

It looks neither hilarious nor yobit has an answer or may be didn't notice my post