Bitcoin Forum
December 12, 2024, 06:37:10 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The new Intel Phi 50 core PCIe board  (Read 816 times)
haarts (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 15, 2012, 03:21:06 PM
 #1

Would a miner take advantage of these new cores without any (or little) code changes?
http://www.drdobbs.com/parallel/intels-50-core-xeon-phi-the-new-era-of-i/240105810?donkey
SysRun
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500


Portland Bitcoin Group Organizer


View Profile
November 15, 2012, 03:30:29 PM
 #2

Sure it will, why not? Will it be the most efficient at it? nope. Does it make sense to try it out? nope.

Images are not allowed. As your member rank increases, you can use more types of styling in your signature, and your signature can be longer. See the stickies in Meta for more info.
Max 2000; characters remaining: 1781
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
November 15, 2012, 03:33:23 PM
 #3

Would a miner take advantage of these new cores without any (or little) code changes?
http://www.drdobbs.com/parallel/intels-50-core-xeon-phi-the-new-era-of-i/240105810?donkey

Yes and no.   The cores run x86 and are not OpenCL compatible so the mining kernels would need to be recoded and recompiled.  This is a pretty trivial requirement.

The major killer is cost.   Looking at the specs my total SWAG would be 2 MH/s per core that would be 100 MH/s per board.  At $2600 each it would be hard to compete with GPUs.  Forget about competing with FPGA or ASICs.

Now for LiteCoin.... maybe but unlikely.  Against a real "memory hard" algorithm (LTC was intentioanlly weakened in this respect) it would be powerful and would be a "CPU killer".  Kinda shows how silly it is to put limits on coin mining.  Eventually something will come along.

Say BTC was designed to be really memory hard such that avg GPU barely outperformed the average CPU.  This is like getting 10+ CPU on a board.   You could build a rig with 8+ of these boards and out power 80+ normal CPU nodes.   Technology always finds a way. 
haarts (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 15, 2012, 03:58:59 PM
 #4


The major killer is cost.   Looking at the specs my total SWAG would be 2 MH/s per core that would be 100 MH/s per board.  At $2600 each it would be hard to compete with GPUs.  Forget about competing with FPGA or ASICs.


How did you get to these numbers?
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
November 15, 2012, 04:37:41 PM
 #5

How did you get to these numbers?

SWAG = Scientific Wild Ass Guess. 

Comparing to Intel existing x86 chips they acheive 1MH/s to 5 MH/s per core.  I split the difference.  Still if it is 5x better it doesn't really change the scenario much.  ASICs are just so massively powerful than if this board had 200 CPU for half the price it wouldn't compare.
Gabi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008


If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat


View Profile
November 15, 2012, 07:24:46 PM
 #6

Would a miner take advantage of these new cores without any (or little) code changes?
http://www.drdobbs.com/parallel/intels-50-core-xeon-phi-the-new-era-of-i/240105810?donkey
Mining on it? It's perfectly doable, and very easy

is it a good idea? NO!

A normal GPU is much much better at mining than it. And in the next month ASIC will be released and they will be the best

The Xeon Phi is a great card, but not for things like mining.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!