mrNightowl (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
June 06, 2011, 03:00:25 AM |
|
With recent attention of bitcoin, i find myself remember conversations from years past. Being a ham radio operator many of my friends in that realm have dabbled in encrypted higher baud rate packet radio over VHF. Because of this it makes me think with newer technologies coming every year, how long will it be before we have a Global Open Source Internet or Decentralized Internet as it may be?
|
|
|
|
zhalox
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 106
XMR = BTC in 2010. Rise chikun.
|
|
June 06, 2011, 03:01:59 AM |
|
There are many implementations of this already, such as FreeNet, Tor, etc.
|
|
|
|
mrNightowl (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
June 06, 2011, 03:07:06 AM |
|
There are many implementations of this already, such as FreeNet, Tor, etc.
Well the problem with those are they all still require a ISP. I'm talking about an entire new network aside from the main internet.
|
|
|
|
error
|
|
June 06, 2011, 03:07:52 AM |
|
There are many implementations of this already, such as FreeNet, Tor, etc.
You missed the point, I think. None of those replace the physical link layer. Look into wireless mesh networking.
|
3KzNGwzRZ6SimWuFAgh4TnXzHpruHMZmV8
|
|
|
mrNightowl (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
June 06, 2011, 03:19:13 AM |
|
There are many implementations of this already, such as FreeNet, Tor, etc.
You missed the point, I think. None of those replace the physical link layer. Look into wireless mesh networking. Yeah thats basically what I'm talking about. It starts out with a bunch of people in 1 city doing it. Then it progresses to surrounding areas. It would be interesting to see a bunch of enthusiasts create a coast to coast network like that.
|
|
|
|
drmoo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
June 06, 2011, 03:47:09 AM |
|
It makes me cringe everytime someone says Wireless Mesh networks will be the future of the Internet. The fact is, Wireless Mesh networks don't scale well, especially over long distances (coast to coast). It takes time to transmit a packet from node to node. The latency involved in transmitting a packet long distances over a mesh network would make todays internet unusable. There's a reason the Internet has backbone providers, their job is to send a packet over long distances with as few "hops" as possible.
A wireless mesh internet would be like going back to using the telegraph.
|
|
|
|
error
|
|
June 06, 2011, 03:50:08 AM |
|
It makes me cringe everytime someone says Wireless Mesh networks will be the future of the Internet. The fact is, Wireless Mesh networks don't scale well, especially over long distances (coast to coast). It takes time to transmit a packet from node to node. The latency involved in transmitting a packet long distances over a mesh network would make todays internet unusable. There's a reason the Internet has backbone providers, their job is to send a packet over long distances with as few "hops" as possible.
A wireless mesh internet would be like going back to using the telegraph.
This is true. But it would also be better than nothing.
|
3KzNGwzRZ6SimWuFAgh4TnXzHpruHMZmV8
|
|
|
mrNightowl (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
June 06, 2011, 03:55:50 AM |
|
It makes me cringe everytime someone says Wireless Mesh networks will be the future of the Internet. The fact is, Wireless Mesh networks don't scale well, especially over long distances (coast to coast). It takes time to transmit a packet from node to node. The latency involved in transmitting a packet long distances over a mesh network would make todays internet unusable. There's a reason the Internet has backbone providers, their job is to send a packet over long distances with as few "hops" as possible.
A wireless mesh internet would be like going back to using the telegraph.
Yeah I get what you mean there. Thats why I made mention of future technology. Subspace communications? Who knows. But honestly as a personal pref for myself. If it had even ISDN speeds I would be happy with that. I don't need all the fancy flash loaded websites and all that.
|
|
|
|
zhalox
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 176
Merit: 106
XMR = BTC in 2010. Rise chikun.
|
|
June 06, 2011, 06:28:09 AM |
|
There are many implementations of this already, such as FreeNet, Tor, etc.
You missed the point, I think. None of those replace the physical link layer. Look into wireless mesh networking. I understand what you mean, but it seems that reinventing the wheel could be wasteful since we already have a network... Besides, the U.S. government regulates communication frequencies via the FCC, etc. unless I'm mistaken.
|
|
|
|
FreeMoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1016
Strength in numbers
|
|
June 06, 2011, 06:48:15 AM |
|
1. Buy a box of Mesh Potatoes 2. Go to supermarket 3. Hand Potatoes to housewives 4. Whisper "Mesh with me" 5. More seriously: 1. Buy Potatoes 2. Set up a booth at a conference/fair with interested folks 3. Give away enough Potatoes to build a local network 4. Sell remaining Potatoes because they are worth a lot more now that there is a network to link into
|
Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone.
|
|
|
hugolp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
Radix-The Decentralized Finance Protocol
|
|
June 06, 2011, 06:59:09 AM |
|
With recent attention of bitcoin, i find myself remember conversations from years past. Being a ham radio operator many of my friends in that realm have dabbled in encrypted higher baud rate packet radio over VHF. Because of this it makes me think with newer technologies coming every year, how long will it be before we have a Global Open Source Internet or Decentralized Internet as it may be?
http://guifi.net Check the map to see how big the network is.
|
|
|
|
wareen
Millionaire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1001
Revolutionizing Brokerage of Personal Data
|
|
June 06, 2011, 07:05:44 AM |
|
It makes me cringe everytime someone says Wireless Mesh networks will be the future of the Internet. The fact is, Wireless Mesh networks don't scale well, especially over long distances (coast to coast). It takes time to transmit a packet from node to node. The latency involved in transmitting a packet long distances over a mesh network would make todays internet unusable. There's a reason the Internet has backbone providers, their job is to send a packet over long distances with as few "hops" as possible.
A wireless mesh internet would be like going back to using the telegraph.
Well, it would surely be a step back in terms of latency but with electronics getting faster all the time, optical mesh networks (free space optics), a few well placed and good connected longer distance links and more intelligent routing algorithms I think it could be quite efficient! Also don't forget that with networks like Freenet or similar P2P technologies, you would have content replicated all over the net and therefore might not have to pass that many hops anyway. Hosting on centralized servers would probably be a thing of the past and it would be a good thing for many reasons. Anyway: I'm all for it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
alkor
|
|
June 06, 2011, 05:39:07 PM |
|
I have been following this project for some time http://www.theconnective.net/but I haven't seen much progress on that front yet. What would be interesting is to see if Software Defined Radio would bring any new possibilities. If we could talk to our neighbors over radio without the intervention of any ISPs that would already be a great step towards a free citizens internet.
|
|
|
|
|
alkor
|
|
June 06, 2011, 06:13:12 PM |
|
This is a great idea! Where can I purchase the device?
|
|
|
|
fabianhjr
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
Do The Evolution
|
|
June 06, 2011, 06:19:37 PM |
|
What you are looking at are mesh networks. The issue, as the state of art, is latency. That is the only thing keeping the ISPs a job.
|
|
|
|
BombaUcigasa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1005
|
|
June 06, 2011, 06:32:40 PM |
|
This is a great idea! Where can I purchase the device? In my home city, we had civil networks built from coaxial cable for about 7 years, then we switched to UTP and FTP so we had basically speeds of 2-3Mb/s between peers, which was sufficient 6 years ago. At some point, we started discussing re-engineering infrared transmitters (for up to 300m points) and laser transmitters (for up to 1km) and use cheap parts or actual optical media converters strapped on a generic switch board. Unfortunately, commercial networks started gaining ground, they split the neighborhoods around the city and finally got bought up by the biggest national ISP. The Czechs advanced further... We don't have any civil networks. We don't need them either, the ISP gives up to 50Mb/s metro speeds. Anywho, for the wireless communications (think fiber optics without the fiber, using only 1W of power, which could be supplied by solar panels) check google for "free space optics" or "Free-space optical communication". And indeed IPv6 combined with different types of meshes could decentralize peer to peer communications as we know them. We can have overhead blimps or kites or UAVs performing the task of mini-satellites, directional WiMAX for up to 35km, low range low cost links as presented above and so on. Only then can we achieve peer to peer governments...
|
|
|
|
wareen
Millionaire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1001
Revolutionizing Brokerage of Personal Data
|
|
June 06, 2011, 09:50:53 PM |
|
Does anybody know of some successor to this project? Ronja is already 10 years old and 10Mbit/s doesn't quite cut it anymore. Commercial FSO devices easily reach multi-gigabit speeds nowadays so it should be possible to get at least 100Mbit/s with cheap components.
|
|
|
|
|