Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
|
November 16, 2015, 03:38:24 PM |
|
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.
LOL Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"? In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist". ... No it isn't. In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism. We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism." This is not complicated. The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
November 16, 2015, 03:48:44 PM |
|
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.
LOL Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"? In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist". ... No it isn't. In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism. We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism." This is not complicated. The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam. There may have been some slight violence attached to Christian fundamentalism. People are people. When they have a difference of opinion, sometimes they duke it out with fists... or guns. The difference for Islam is, violence is virtually required at times, by their religious writings. Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism. Christian writings dictate peace... virtually all the time.
|
|
|
|
Vika NSFW
|
|
November 16, 2015, 04:03:30 PM |
|
In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism. We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism." This is not complicated.
The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam.
This termin is a fake termin of Jew brainwashing terminology, here is the example of it: http://biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/eq/2006-3_221.pdf"Islam fundamentalism" exist not.
|
|
|
|
Vika NSFW
|
|
November 16, 2015, 04:13:08 PM |
|
Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism.
How do You will call "Liberal export of Democracy" to ISIS territory? A Rainbow beam of 500 KG Bombs? National-Socialist Fighters of Syria allies. Holy Liberalism in best colours of itself.
|
|
|
|
spazzdla
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 16, 2015, 04:19:35 PM Last edit: November 17, 2015, 03:32:12 AM by spazzdla |
|
This isn't racist.
It has to do with religion.
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
November 16, 2015, 04:20:00 PM |
|
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.
LOL Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"? In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist". ... No it isn't. In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism. We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism." This is not complicated. The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam. There may have been some slight violence attached to Christian fundamentalism. People are people. When they have a difference of opinion, sometimes they duke it out with fists... or guns. The difference for Islam is, violence is virtually required at times, by their religious writings. Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism. Christian writings dictate peace... virtually all the time. Well, I wouldn´t really classify the end of the world as "slight" violence. Christian fundamentals, at least the craziest of them, believe that Armageddon is a great thing because they and their followers will somehow end up as winners up in the clouds somewhere. When you have people like that in power or advising people in power who knows maybe they´re working on making that great idea happen. There was plenty of them around Bush, don´t know if Obama got rid of them. In any events there´s millions of them in the U.S. Which is a concern since it´s a nuclear power so their dream can come true.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
November 16, 2015, 04:20:59 PM |
|
Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism.
How do You will call "Liberal export of Democracy" to ISIS territory? A Rainbow beam of 500 KG Bombs? National-Socialist Fighters of Syria allies. Holy Liberalism in best colours of itself. Not sure what you mean, but... The exporting of real democracy to Islamic countries would bring about an abundance of freedom for Muslims, freedom that they do not presently have.
|
|
|
|
HostSurf
|
|
November 16, 2015, 04:21:06 PM |
|
Refugees are accepted, not based on your race nor religion
It's called being human trying to help a fellow human being.
You can easily compare this to as your neigbour having a fire in their house and they become homeless, wouldn't you help them out and have them over until they get back on their feet?
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
November 16, 2015, 04:27:50 PM |
|
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.
LOL Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"? In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist". ... No it isn't. In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism. We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism." This is not complicated. The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam. There may have been some slight violence attached to Christian fundamentalism. People are people. When they have a difference of opinion, sometimes they duke it out with fists... or guns. The difference for Islam is, violence is virtually required at times, by their religious writings. Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism. Christian writings dictate peace... virtually all the time. Well, I wouldn´t really classify the end of the world as "slight" violence. Christian fundamentals, at least the craziest of them, believe that Armageddon is a great thing because they and their followers will somehow end up as winners up in the clouds somewhere. When you have people like that in power or advising people in power who knows maybe they´re working on making that great idea happen. There was plenty of them around Bush, don´t know if Obama got rid of them. In any events there´s millions of them in the U.S. Which is a concern since it´s a nuclear power so their dream can come true. While there are a bunch of Christians that think like this, the ones that seem to be pushing war in the Middle East, are doing so for two reasons: 1. To keep Islam from starting Armageddon; 2. Oil profits. The Christians who like the idea of Armageddon are simpletons that unwittingly support the real war makers through taxes that they don't have any idea about how to stop paying.
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
November 16, 2015, 04:37:17 PM |
|
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.
LOL Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"? In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist". ... No it isn't. In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism. We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism." This is not complicated. The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam. There may have been some slight violence attached to Christian fundamentalism. People are people. When they have a difference of opinion, sometimes they duke it out with fists... or guns. The difference for Islam is, violence is virtually required at times, by their religious writings. Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism. Christian writings dictate peace... virtually all the time. Well, I wouldn´t really classify the end of the world as "slight" violence. Christian fundamentals, at least the craziest of them, believe that Armageddon is a great thing because they and their followers will somehow end up as winners up in the clouds somewhere. When you have people like that in power or advising people in power who knows maybe they´re working on making that great idea happen. There was plenty of them around Bush, don´t know if Obama got rid of them. In any events there´s millions of them in the U.S. Which is a concern since it´s a nuclear power so their dream can come true. While there are a bunch of Christians that think like this, the ones that seem to be pushing war in the Middle East, are doing so for two reasons: 1. To keep Islam from starting Armageddon; 2. Oil profits. The Christians who like the idea of Armageddon are simpletons that unwittingly support the real war makers through taxes that they don't have any idea about how to stop paying. Like I said, there was a bunch of those "simpletons" around Bush. And it´s a matter of historical record that he claimed that god had ordered him to attack Iraq and did so numerous times. Of course he didn´t mention that until after it was a done deal and they had invaded Iraq. Before the fact it was weapons of mass destruction, the new hitler and terriers and all that stuff. Anyway, it´s easy to confuse simpletons with certifiable nutcases or explain their nuttiness away that way.
|
|
|
|
Vika NSFW
|
|
November 16, 2015, 04:41:59 PM |
|
freedom for Muslims
Oh, so much teories "How to made better the life of muslims". Such "export" is the consequence of today situation in Lybia, Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan.
|
|
|
|
Spendulus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1386
|
|
November 16, 2015, 04:50:11 PM |
|
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.
LOL Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"? In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist". ... No it isn't. In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism. We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism." This is not complicated. The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam. There may have been some slight violence attached to Christian fundamentalism. People are people. When they have a difference of opinion, sometimes they duke it out with fists... or guns. The difference for Islam is, violence is virtually required at times, by their religious writings. Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism. Christian writings dictate peace... virtually all the time. Well, I wouldn´t really classify the end of the world as "slight" violence. Christian fundamentals, at least the craziest of them, believe that Armageddon is a great thing because they and their followers will somehow end up as winners up in the clouds somewhere. When you have people like that in power or advising people in power who knows maybe they´re working on making that great idea happen. There was plenty of them around Bush, don´t know if Obama got rid of them. In any events there´s millions of them in the U.S. Which is a concern since it´s a nuclear power so their dream can come true. Just let me know when our friendly Christian fundamentalists start beheading people, will you please? Otherwise drop the lame attempt at moral equivalence, and write something that's wroth reading.
|
|
|
|
MR.Seller
|
|
November 16, 2015, 05:03:26 PM |
|
Not all muslim are bad. all people in the world created by God of course Muslim or not can go where ever they want there is no law that Muslim can go in some country. Why you need to think that Muslim can't. Are you God that can hold Muslim to go some where or put them only to there country.
"The person who is sinless should be the first to throw a stone at her" and now talk if why our country accept Muslims.
|
^^^^Researcher^^^^
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
November 16, 2015, 05:12:40 PM Last edit: November 16, 2015, 05:32:50 PM by galdur |
|
I don't know of any news sites that repressent all arabs as suspected terrorists.
LOL Who put and use this fake termin "radical fundamentalism"? In this mode any "muslim" is on the risk to be so dangerous person and at risk to be "suspected terrorist". ... No it isn't. In the western world we have a well known phenomena, Christian fundamentalism. We also have "radical Christian fudmanentalism." This is not complicated. The same words and concepts certainly apply to other religions such as Islam. There may have been some slight violence attached to Christian fundamentalism. People are people. When they have a difference of opinion, sometimes they duke it out with fists... or guns. The difference for Islam is, violence is virtually required at times, by their religious writings. Islamic fundamentalism is way more violent that Christian fundamentalism. Christian writings dictate peace... virtually all the time. Well, I wouldn´t really classify the end of the world as "slight" violence. Christian fundamentals, at least the craziest of them, believe that Armageddon is a great thing because they and their followers will somehow end up as winners up in the clouds somewhere. When you have people like that in power or advising people in power who knows maybe they´re working on making that great idea happen. There was plenty of them around Bush, don´t know if Obama got rid of them. In any events there´s millions of them in the U.S. Which is a concern since it´s a nuclear power so their dream can come true. Just let me know when our friendly Christian fundamentalists start beheading people, will you please? Otherwise drop the lame attempt at moral equivalence, and write something that's wroth reading. I guess truth hurts. You voted for this guy, right? President George W Bush told Palestinian ministers that God had told him to invade Afghanistan and Iraq - and create a Palestinian State, a new BBC series reveals. In Elusive Peace: Israel and the Arabs, a major three-part series on BBC TWO (at 9.00pm on Monday 10, Monday 17 and Monday 24 October), Abu Mazen, Palestinian Prime Minister, and Nabil Shaath, his Foreign Minister, describe their first meeting with President Bush in June 2003. Nabil Shaath says: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I'm driven with a mission from God. God would tell me, "George, go and fight those terrorists in Afghanistan." And I did, and then God would tell me, "George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq ." And I did. And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, "Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East." And by God I'm gonna do it.' " http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2005/10_october/06/bush.shtml
|
|
|
|
Vika NSFW
|
|
November 16, 2015, 05:13:47 PM Last edit: November 16, 2015, 05:28:23 PM by Vika NSFW |
|
all people in the world created by God
People is created by vagina and dick, all of them. 100% information, the smallest % is artificially created using non supported by Quran and Torah metods.
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
November 16, 2015, 05:21:17 PM |
|
Too bad that Bush didn´t mention those orders from god BEFORE the invasion. He should have made this important announcement at the United Nations. Then everybody would have realized IN TIME that he was batshit crazy and the whole thing and what has followed could have been prevented.
|
|
|
|
Vika NSFW
|
|
November 16, 2015, 05:33:56 PM |
|
those orders from
The final story will be Kirsan Ilyumzhinov as president of Russian Federation.
|
|
|
|
Balthazar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
|
November 16, 2015, 05:43:19 PM |
|
This poor guy needs your help. He ran away from home to save his life from Assad's bombs. Remember that he comes from the different culture. Though you can't understand some of his traditions, please be polite with him. Political correctness is your friend.
|
|
|
|
Vika NSFW
|
|
November 16, 2015, 05:59:52 PM |
|
he comes from the different culture
|
|
|
|
Losvienleg
|
|
November 16, 2015, 06:08:27 PM |
|
I think it´s in principle a good idea to mix people or whatever they want to call it. But it has to be a long and gradual process, probably over a century or centuries. It can´t be good to move millions of people in few years or even months between radically different environments and cultures.
No, mixing populations is not a good thing. I suppose your white. Would you like that your descendants become semitic, like Algerian ? I hope not. I would like this for mine. I'm proud to be the descendant of Germanic europeans, light haired and light eyed (like me). I'm proud of my race, like you should be ! My credo is : for the Nation, for the Race, for God ! Every proud white man should have the same.
|
|
|
|
|