'Unprecedented' rise in deaths from terrorism

[galdur]

'Unprecedented' rise in deaths from terrorism

The number of people killed globally in terrorist attacks jumped 80 percent last year to the highest level ever recorded, the Institute for Economics and Peace said on Tuesday.
The Global Terrorism Index found that 32,658 people were killed by terrorists in 2014, up from the 18,111 fatalities of the previous year, the largest increase on record.
The study defines terrorism as "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".
Nigeria-based Boko Haram and the Islamic State group were responsible for more than half of the deaths, according to the study, which measures attacks, deaths and damage from terror attacks in 162 countries.
"Terrorism is gaining momentum at an unprecedented pace," said Steve Killelea, the executive chairman of the Institute of Economics and Peace, which produces the study.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11997820/Paris-France-terror-attacks-isil-suspects-Syria-Raqqa-boming-arrests-live.html

Yeah, and  "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation" is the exact opposite of course.

[1715619262]

1715619262

[1715619262]

1715619262

[Spendulus]

'Unprecedented' rise in deaths from terrorism

The number of people killed globally in terrorist attacks jumped 80 percent last year to the highest level ever recorded, the Institute for Economics and Peace said on Tuesday.
The Global Terrorism Index found that 32,658 people were killed by terrorists in 2014, up from the 18,111 fatalities of the previous year, the largest increase on record.
The study defines terrorism as "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".
Nigeria-based Boko Haram and the Islamic State group were responsible for more than half of the deaths, according to the study, which measures attacks, deaths and damage from terror attacks in 162 countries.
"Terrorism is gaining momentum at an unprecedented pace," said Steve Killelea, the executive chairman of the Institute of Economics and Peace, which produces the study.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11997820/Paris-France-terror-attacks-isil-suspects-Syria-Raqqa-boming-arrests-live.html

Yeah, and  "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation" is the exact opposite of course.

Actually, yes it is the exact opposite.   You may not like those definitions of the words, but they do seem to be useful.  Typically we assign names to things, and verbs to actions, in order to distinguish them and understand them better.  Makes sense to me.

[BADecker]

In America it's things like the Internet and other forms of communication that are only bringing to light the deaths from terrorists - cops and government - that have been going on for decades. There really isn't an increase in America.

[galdur]

Spendulus, But it´s the state that decides what´s legal or not. For example I don´t see what´s legal about sending drones here and there around the world wiping out weddings and funerals and more. Nor do I see anything legal about invading countries on totally false pretenses and then leaving them in ruins for terrorism to fester in.

[galdur]

How about keeping people in some gulags on land and sea forever without normal judicial process. Does that sound legal?

[BADecker]

But it´s the state that decides what´s legal or not. For example I don´t see what´s legal about sending drones here and there around the world wiping out weddings and funerals and more. Nor do I see anything legal about invading countries on totally false pretenses and then leaving them in ruins for terrorism to fester in.

The greatest thing that the American government has done to further its abilities to do anything that it wants is, they have made the people forget the difference between legal and lawful. All the people think that they are bound by legal, when according to the basic, foundational documents that keep the government in place, the people are not under legal, but only under lawful.

If the people understood lawful, they could stop paying income tax, and the government would collapse, and they could file claims against government people rather than their governmental offices, and sue the pants off these crooks so that they would be out of office.

Why don't I do something like this? Because I am only finding out, myself... it has been that well hidden by government and their lawyers.

[galdur]

But it´s the state that decides what´s legal or not. For example I don´t see what´s legal about sending drones here and there around the world wiping out weddings and funerals and more. Nor do I see anything legal about invading countries on totally false pretenses and then leaving them in ruins for terrorism to fester in.

The greatest thing that the American government has done to further its abilities to do anything that it wants is, they have made the people forget the difference between legal and lawful. All the people think that they are bound by legal, when according to the basic, foundational documents that keep the government in place, the people are not under legal, but only under lawful.

If the people understood lawful, they could stop paying income tax, and the government would collapse, and they could file claims against government people rather than their governmental offices, and sue the pants off these crooks so that they would be out of office.

Why don't I do something like this? Because I am only finding out, myself... it has been that well hidden by government and their lawyers.

Well, that´s just a great point, BADecker. Legal and lawful. Form vs. substance. Feel free to post more on that by all means.

[BADecker]

But it´s the state that decides what´s legal or not. For example I don´t see what´s legal about sending drones here and there around the world wiping out weddings and funerals and more. Nor do I see anything legal about invading countries on totally false pretenses and then leaving them in ruins for terrorism to fester in.

The greatest thing that the American government has done to further its abilities to do anything that it wants is, they have made the people forget the difference between legal and lawful. All the people think that they are bound by legal, when according to the basic, foundational documents that keep the government in place, the people are not under legal, but only under lawful.

If the people understood lawful, they could stop paying income tax, and the government would collapse, and they could file claims against government people rather than their governmental offices, and sue the pants off these crooks so that they would be out of office.

Why don't I do something like this? Because I am only finding out, myself... it has been that well hidden by government and their lawyers.

Well, that´s just a great point, BADecker. Legal and lawful. Form vs. substance. Feel free to post more on that by all means.

I have posted this many times. Here it is again. It's a long learn. Start with these 10 Youtube videos, especially the last one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D.

Then look at the first two videos in the group on the right side of this page http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html.

Then listen to numbers 01 and 02 at the bottom of this page http://recordings.talkshoe.com/rss127469.xml.

Next, DuckDuckGo and Youtube search on "Karl Lentz common law." Karl says, "It's so simple it's scary."

And below are a load of links to get you started.

http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html = Angela Stark's Talkshoe.

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5duR4OvEHHxOSdEZhANETw = TrustInAllLaw snippets of Karl's audios.

http://www.broadmind.org/ = Karl's main page.

http://www.unkommonlaw.co.uk/ = Karl's United Kingdom page.

http://www.youtube.com/user/765736/videos?view=0&live_view=500&flow=grid&sort=da = Craig Lynch's snippets page.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D = Ten great Youtube videos, might be the best introduction to Karl.

http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=127469&cmd=tc = Karl's Talkshoe site.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iua56K4Mysk = Karl Lentz - The Brian Bonar Incident - YouTube.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdHLHWS4gPE = Lentz-Sense - don't be a More~On - YouTube.


Other Info

http://voidjudgments.com/ = The Secret is most judgments are Void on their face and not merely voidable.

http://educationcenter2000.com/Trinsey-v-Paglario.htm = Trinsey v. Pagliaro - Attorneys cannot "speak" in common law trials if the one who is bringing the suit orders it. Holding from Trinsey v. Pagliaro: "An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness."

Last, ask Mike Miller of Calminlaw, or Gus Breton of https://redress4dummies.wordpress.com/ to let you into the Skype Calminlaw group.

[galdur]

OK, thanks. I see so much that I need to check and then I forget it but this your post is in a word document now and glaring at me from the desktop so I´ll get to it.

[avw1982]

'Unprecedented' rise in deaths from terrorism

The number of people killed globally in terrorist attacks jumped 80 percent last year to the highest level ever recorded, the Institute for Economics and Peace said on Tuesday.
The Global Terrorism Index found that 32,658 people were killed by terrorists in 2014, up from the 18,111 fatalities of the previous year, the largest increase on record.
The study defines terrorism as "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".
Nigeria-based Boko Haram and the Islamic State group were responsible for more than half of the deaths, according to the study, which measures attacks, deaths and damage from terror attacks in 162 countries.
"Terrorism is gaining momentum at an unprecedented pace," said Steve Killelea, the executive chairman of the Institute of Economics and Peace, which produces the study.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11997820/Paris-France-terror-attacks-isil-suspects-Syria-Raqqa-boming-arrests-live.html

Yeah, and  "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation" is the exact opposite of course.

There is Illegal group ISIS and other doing this bomb blasts and everything. But few days before one of Australian minister said this attacks are making International politicians to make their base stronger and stronger. Don't predict anything without handfull of evidence. may be U.S. and France may part in that.

[galdur]

'Unprecedented' rise in deaths from terrorism

The number of people killed globally in terrorist attacks jumped 80 percent last year to the highest level ever recorded, the Institute for Economics and Peace said on Tuesday.
The Global Terrorism Index found that 32,658 people were killed by terrorists in 2014, up from the 18,111 fatalities of the previous year, the largest increase on record.
The study defines terrorism as "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".
Nigeria-based Boko Haram and the Islamic State group were responsible for more than half of the deaths, according to the study, which measures attacks, deaths and damage from terror attacks in 162 countries.
"Terrorism is gaining momentum at an unprecedented pace," said Steve Killelea, the executive chairman of the Institute of Economics and Peace, which produces the study.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11997820/Paris-France-terror-attacks-isil-suspects-Syria-Raqqa-boming-arrests-live.html

Yeah, and  "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation" is the exact opposite of course.

There is Illegal group ISIS and other doing this bomb blasts and everything. But few days before one of Australian minister said this attacks are making International politicians to make their base stronger and stronger. Don't predict anything without handfull of evidence. may be U.S. and France may part in that.

Yeah, yeah that´s illegal. We know that. But there´s tons of other things happening and have been taking place  well forever? I mean; there have been freedom fighters slaughtering people in the name of democracy and that was OK because the people that ran those freedom fighters said so. Later they became terrorists and killed our people which obviously wasn´t OK. It seems quite murky, truth to be rold. There are many angles. Of course I realize that it´s kind of unfair to mention these things because as we all know corruption and lackadaisical interpretation of the law is the absolutely last things that come to mind as the government is concerned, being such paragons of integrity and transparency and truthfulness that their record shows them to be. Still, those definitions seem a bit unclear.

[BADecker]

OK, thanks. I see so much that I need to check and then I forget it but this your post is in a word document now and glaring at me from the desktop so I´ll get to it.

Basically, the whole thing amounts to this. The foundational law in America has to do with someone harming another person or damaging his property. If a corporate body attacks a human being in some way, the corporate body loses. The basic law of America is man vs. man.

That simple.

[vero]

""...A total of 32,658 people were killed by terrorists around the world in 2014..."". No mention of what part was done by muslim terrorists. Why not? Because telling us would show immediately that muslim terrorists murdered more people than all other terrorists in the world combined.

[InsideBjorn]

""...A total of 32,658 people were killed by terrorists around the world in 2014..."". No mention of what part was done by muslim terrorists. Why not? Because telling us would show immediately that muslim terrorists murdered more people than all other terrorists in the world combined.

Why would their religion matter? A terrotist is still a terrorist. I do agree that a lot of terrorist have the religion of the islam but if they say it like you're saying it, it would aggravate a lot people mentioning the religion and it would intend that all muslims are terrorist, which is not true.

[galdur]

""...A total of 32,658 people were killed by terrorists around the world in 2014..."". No mention of what part was done by muslim terrorists. Why not? Because telling us would show immediately that muslim terrorists murdered more people than all other terrorists in the world combined.

Why would their religion matter? A terrotist is still a terrorist. I do agree that a lot of terrorist have the religion of the islam but if they say it like you're saying it, it would aggravate a lot people mentioning the religion and it would intend that all muslims are terrorist, which is not true.

What I posted is just a snippet from The Telegraph.  I guess those who are interested can get all the breakdown at the website of the institution.

[galdur]

BC: How long it lasts depends on whether the places out of which really big, effective terrorist groups are operating remain essentially stateless. The territories in Pakistan and the border area with Afghanistan are not part of a centralized state. Robert Kaplan has written tons of books about what’s going on in the modern world, and if you read The Ends of the Earth and these books that say we are de facto, no matter what the laws say, becoming nations of mega-city-states full of really poor, angry, uneducated, and highly vulnerable people, all over the world, we would have a lot of slumdog millionaires. If that’s right, then terror — meaning killing and robbery and coercion by people who do not have state authority and go beyond national borders — could be around for a very long time. On the other hand, terrorism needs both anxiety and opportunity to flourish. So one of the things that the United States and others ought to be doing is trying to help the nation-state adjust to the realities of the 21st century and then succeed.


Bill Clinton’s World

The former president tells Foreign Policy what to read, who to watch, and why there really is a chance of Middle East peace in 2010.

http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/11/30/bill-clintons-world/

[avw1982]

In America it's things like the Internet and other forms of communication that are only bringing to light the deaths from terrorists - cops and government - that have been going on for decades. There really isn't an increase in America.

Americans believes this was the first grassroot event to openly engage in this kind of vital dialogue on most dangerous and important issue for our generation. If Iran get nuclear bomb  It ll not need a large army to cause unimaginable destruction of death

[spazzdla]

LOL, the state can rape, slaughter, torture and it's JUST FINE GUYS!!

[BADecker]

""...A total of 32,658 people were killed by terrorists around the world in 2014..."". No mention of what part was done by muslim terrorists. Why not? Because telling us would show immediately that muslim terrorists murdered more people than all other terrorists in the world combined.

But that number is way off. It doesn't include  - can't include - all the citizens of the various countries killed off by their own terrorist governments. Like all the unreported murders done by terrorist cops in America.

[BADecker]

""...A total of 32,658 people were killed by terrorists around the world in 2014..."". No mention of what part was done by muslim terrorists. Why not? Because telling us would show immediately that muslim terrorists murdered more people than all other terrorists in the world combined.

Why would their religion matter? A terrotist is still a terrorist. I do agree that a lot of terrorist have the religion of the islam but if they say it like you're saying it, it would aggravate a lot people mentioning the religion and it would intend that all muslims are terrorist, which is not true.

Actually, ALL Muslims ARE terrorists... if they want to be faithful to their religion as it is written. The thing is that they don't KNOW that they are terrorists.

When they find out that they are terrorists, they will either stop being Muslims, or they will enact the terrorist part. When they do the terrorist part, they will ultimately be destroyed, even though they make are painful for a little while.