Bitcoin Forum
September 26, 2016, 07:03:09 PM *
News: Due to DDoS attacks, there may be periodic downtime.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Internal version number  (Read 985 times)
satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
September 23, 2010, 04:19:08 PM
 #1

In the next release (0.3.13), I'm going to change the format of the internal version number integer from 313 to 31300, for instance 31305 = 0.3.13.5.  The last number represents changes on the SVN between releases and ought to be properly represented in the version number.  Otherwise, it would be a pain if we had a mistake or something in one of the sub versions that needed to be worked around.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1474916589
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474916589

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474916589
Reply with quote  #2

1474916589
Report to moderator
1474916589
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1474916589

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1474916589
Reply with quote  #2

1474916589
Report to moderator
nelisky
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554


View Profile
September 23, 2010, 04:48:04 PM
 #2

In the next release (0.3.13), I'm going to change the format of the internal version number integer from 313 to 31300, for instance 31305 = 0.3.13.5.  The last number represents changes on the SVN between releases and ought to be properly represented in the version number.  Otherwise, it would be a pain if we had a mistake or something in one of the sub versions that needed to be worked around.

Thanks for the heads up. I'm actually checking version on my web apps, to assert if backupwallet is available, but as my private version is now widespread, it should be very simple to cope with that change.
satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
September 23, 2010, 06:46:20 PM
 #3

I don't think it should cause any problems for version comparisons.  31300 > 312.
nelisky
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554


View Profile
September 23, 2010, 06:51:19 PM
 #4

I don't think it should cause any problems for version comparisons.  31300 > 312.

obviously, *ahem* just checking if you were paying attention, that's all Wink
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!