Bitcoin Forum
July 27, 2017, 04:57:01 AM *
News: BIP91 seems stable: there's probably only slightly increased risk of confirmations disappearing. You should still prepare for Aug 1.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Internal version number  (Read 1114 times)
satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
September 23, 2010, 04:19:08 PM
 #1

In the next release (0.3.13), I'm going to change the format of the internal version number integer from 313 to 31300, for instance 31305 = 0.3.13.5.  The last number represents changes on the SVN between releases and ought to be properly represented in the version number.  Otherwise, it would be a pain if we had a mistake or something in one of the sub versions that needed to be worked around.
1501131421
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1501131421

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1501131421
Reply with quote  #2

1501131421
Report to moderator
1501131421
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1501131421

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1501131421
Reply with quote  #2

1501131421
Report to moderator
1501131421
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1501131421

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1501131421
Reply with quote  #2

1501131421
Report to moderator
Decentralized search
Search for products or services and get paid for it
Join pre-ICO
25 July. 50% discount
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
nelisky
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554


View Profile
September 23, 2010, 04:48:04 PM
 #2

In the next release (0.3.13), I'm going to change the format of the internal version number integer from 313 to 31300, for instance 31305 = 0.3.13.5.  The last number represents changes on the SVN between releases and ought to be properly represented in the version number.  Otherwise, it would be a pain if we had a mistake or something in one of the sub versions that needed to be worked around.

Thanks for the heads up. I'm actually checking version on my web apps, to assert if backupwallet is available, but as my private version is now widespread, it should be very simple to cope with that change.
satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member
*
qt
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
September 23, 2010, 06:46:20 PM
 #3

I don't think it should cause any problems for version comparisons.  31300 > 312.
nelisky
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554


View Profile
September 23, 2010, 06:51:19 PM
 #4

I don't think it should cause any problems for version comparisons.  31300 > 312.

obviously, *ahem* just checking if you were paying attention, that's all Wink
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!