|
MakingMoneyHoney
|
 |
December 08, 2015, 04:22:24 PM |
|
And the bad part is that many people will look at it once, and never return for any followup. So, they will walk away with the idea that it was a Muslim terrorist thing. People need to understand that it either is planned and carried out by government people, or it is allowed by them, no matter what it is. Even Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen by FDR, who knew of the plans of the Japs at least 2 weeks ahead of time. Virtually all the terrorist actions done in America since then have been allowed or cause by people in the American government. And the media is right in government's pocket, proclaiming it to the American masses just the way the government wants the people to believe. Thank Goodness that we have the Internet so that we can see through many of the government's coverups. Which is why they want to shut that Destructive Naughty thing down!! Bad internet!'Spell-check for hate' needed, says Google's Schmidt
"Technology companies should work on tools to disrupt terrorism - such as creating a hate speech "spell-checker" - Google's chairman Eric Schmidt has said.
Writing in the New York Times, Mr Schmidt said using technology to automatically filter-out extremist material would "de-escalate tensions on social media" and "remove videos before they spread"...."According to the TPP, this will include corporations, because if you say anything bad about a corporation, you'll be in trouble. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 08, 2015, 04:59:07 PM |
|
And the bad part is that many people will look at it once, and never return for any followup. So, they will walk away with the idea that it was a Muslim terrorist thing. People need to understand that it either is planned and carried out by government people, or it is allowed by them, no matter what it is. Even Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen by FDR, who knew of the plans of the Japs at least 2 weeks ahead of time. Virtually all the terrorist actions done in America since then have been allowed or cause by people in the American government. And the media is right in government's pocket, proclaiming it to the American masses just the way the government wants the people to believe. Thank Goodness that we have the Internet so that we can see through many of the government's coverups.Which is why they want to shut that Destructive Naughty thing down!! Bad internet!'Spell-check for hate' needed, says Google's Schmidt
"Technology companies should work on tools to disrupt terrorism - such as creating a hate speech "spell-checker" - Google's chairman Eric Schmidt has said.
Writing in the New York Times, Mr Schmidt said using technology to automatically filter-out extremist material would "de-escalate tensions on social media" and "remove videos before they spread"...."According to the TPP, this will include corporations, because if you say anything bad about a corporation, you'll be in trouble. What's interesting about racism and hate speech is, in order for government people to enforce these things, they have to do the racism and the hate speech more than the people they are accusing did. |
|
|
|
|
|
BADecker (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 09, 2015, 05:13:59 AM |
|
California shooting another US false flag attack: Analyst The following is a rough transcription of the interview.
Press TV: Even the attorney for this family, I believe he was on CNN, brought up many inconsistencies on the story. How do you feel about this?
Barrett: I’m afraid that we may be seeing yet another false flag massacre like September 11, 2001, like July 7th, 2005 and like the two recent shooting attacks in Paris. It appears that all of these events and many many others are part of a program that’s called “Gladio B.”
It’s a continuation of the NATO false flag terror program that blue people often murdered people throughout the Cold War in Europe. It was run by the United States’ joint chiefs of staff. Today the Gladio B program is run essentially by the same people with the huge new input from the Israelis.
... Read more at http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/12/06/440531/US-California-Shooting-False-Flag-Barrett.Read the comments at the link^^.
|
|
|
|
BADecker (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 10, 2015, 05:05:39 PM |
|
3rd Eyewitness To San Bernardino Shooting Says It Wasn't 'Terror Couple' Who Carried It Out "It's not him," a third San Bernardino shooting witness proclaimed about Sayd Farook and his wife.
The so-called "terror couple" have been accused of masterminding an ISIS terror attack on a Christmas office party whereSayd worked.
...Now, a third prominent eye-witness, Chirs Nwadike, has stepped up to challenge the mainstream narrative. He recently told reporters he received a phone call from an unknown person around 7 p.m., on the evening of the shooting, who told him that he must say that Sayd Farook was the shooter.
You read that right, he says that he was called and told to change his story and say that Farook carried out the attacks with his wife, even though that is very different than what he witnessed. Read more at http://www.blacklistednews.com/Third_Eyewitness_To_San_Bernardino_Shooting_Says_It_Wasn%E2%80%99t_%E2%80%98Terror_Couple%E2%80%99_Who_Carried_Out_Attack/47722/0/38/38/Y/M.html.Youtube video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWrSdY0NWgg
|
|
|
|
BADecker (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 10, 2015, 08:13:50 PM |
|
A Needle in a Haystack If you were looking for a needle in a haystack, simple logic would tell you that the smaller the haystack the likelier you are to find the needle. Except for the government.
Since Edward Snowden revealed the federal government's unlawful and unconstitutional use of federal statutes to justify spying on all in America all the time, including the members of Congress who unwittingly wrote and passed the statutes, I have been arguing that the Fourth Amendment prohibits all domestic spying, except that which has been authorized by a search warrant issued by a judge. The same amendment also requires that warrants be issued only based on a serious level of individualized suspicion backed up by evidence — called probable cause — and the warrants must specifically identify the place and person to be spied upon.
Because these requirements are in the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, Congress and the president and the courts are bound by them. There is no emergency or public safety or wartime exception to them. These requirements cannot be changed by legislation; only a constitutional amendment, ratified by the legislatures of 37 states, can do so.
All of this is what lawyers and judges call black letter law — meaning it is well-understood, has not been seriously challenged and is nearly universally accepted. Except by the government.
The government — which thinks it can right any wrong, tax any event, regulate any behavior and interfere with any right — also thinks it can keep us safe from the terrorists among us by cutting constitutional corners, which it has done many times since 9/11. Among the constitutional corners it has cut is unleashing its 60,000 domestic spies upon us with orders to disregard the constitutional requirements for spying on Americans and gather all the data about us that they can by listening to phone calls and reading emails, as well as gathering the banking information, credit card information, utility bills, postal mail and medical records of everyone in America, without regard to individualized suspicion.
The government's behavior is premised upon the false belief that it can morally and constitutionally interfere with our natural right to privacy without due process and upon the absurd belief that surrendering personal liberty somehow keeps us safe.
As we know from the tragedy last week in San Bernardino, California, the government's strategy and practices failed to keep us safe. The governmental failure at San Bernardino was the confluence of a state government with antipathy and animosity toward the natural right of self-defense and a federal government attempting to devour far more data than it can handle. Read more at https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/12/andrew-p-napolitano/surveillance-lies/.
|
|
|
|
BADecker (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3780
Merit: 1372
|
|
December 13, 2015, 11:30:35 PM |
|
Media Refusing to Cover Police & Witness Accounts of "3 White Male Shooters" in San Bernardino On the night of December 2, after the tragic shootings at the Inland Regional Medical Center, CBS Evening News interviewed a witness to the shooting.
The interview, which took place live and over the phone, has not been covered by any other mainstream outlet despite the vastly different details provided which completely contradict the subsequent 'official' narrative, while backing up several other eyewitness accounts.
Witness Sally Abdelmageed, who works at the Inland Regional Center, and witnessed the shooting, spoke to CBS correspondent Scott Pelley.
During this interview, Pelley would ask Abdelmageed to describe the shooters in detail. Abdelmageed replied that the shooters were three tall athletic white men.
Below is the transcribed conversation from last week's interview.
Scott Pelley: One of the witnesses today is Sally Abdelmageed, who works at the Inland Regional Center, the building where the attack took place. She saw the attackers enter the building and we spoke to her by phone.
...   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwTYja7GXcYRead more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/media-refusing-cover-police-witness-accounts-3-white-male-shooters-san-bernardino/EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZL3eBl3MMA
|
|
|
|
|
