BREAKING: SWAT Team Drill Turns into REAL Mass Shooting Scenario

[BADecker]

BREAKING: SWAT Team Drill Turns into REAL Mass Shooting Scenario in San Bernardino, CA

The shooting apparently took place at the Inland Regional Center, which is a facility that provides services for people who have developmental disabilities. The facility had just celebrated its Christmas party.

While details are scarce, what we have been told by authorities is that police are looking for 1-3 shooters and there are approximately 20 victims, with 12 being presumed dead.

Fox Los Angeles reports that the suspects are "white males" in "military gear" and armed with "rifles."

According to KTLA, police have warned people not to talk to the media. At one point during the KTLA live stream, the reporter attempted to interview a witness and multiple officers rushed up and pushed the reporters and the witnesses apart. Below is a screen grab from the live stream showing confrontation.

From http://thefreethoughtproject.com/breaking-swat-team-drill-turns-real-mass-shooting-scenario-san-bernadino-ca/:

...

According to KTLA, police have warned people not to talk to the media. At one point during the KTLA live stream, the reporter attempted to interview a witness and multiple officers rushed up and pushed the reporters and the witnesses apart.

...

What makes this noteworthy is that this is not the first time that emergency drills for the exact scenario unfolding were taking place at virtually the same moment the actual terrorist attacks began.

Paris-area emergency personnel and ambulance crews were taking part in a simulated emergency exercise on the very same day the Paris terrorist attacks took place.

During the 9/11 attacks on the U.S., North American Aerospace Defense Command’s (NORAD) was in the midst of a training exercise called Vigilant Guardian, which “coincidentally” simulated planes being hijacked by terrorists.

...

Click the picture and the other link to find links within the scripts, and video.

[BADecker]

2 Suspects Named In Shootings That Killed 14, Wounded 17 In San Bernardino

SAN BERNARDINO (CBSLA.com) — Fourteen people were confirmed killed and 17 more wounded in a mass shooting at a San Bernardino community social services building.

"We do have some preliminary numbers of upwards of 14 people that are dead and upwards of 14 people that are injured," said Chief Jarrod Burguan of San Bernardino Police. The number of injured was later upped to 17.

At least 10 of the injured are reportedly in critical condition.

CBS News confirms one of the suspects is named Syed Farook, an American citizen. One of the other suspects is reportedly his brother.

...

The details of the story are found at http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2015/12/02/multiple-victims-reported-shot-in-san-bernardino/. When you read the story here, it becomes apparent that the reporter(s) aren't really clear about what happened. It wouldn't surprise me if some of the SWAT that were drilling nearby were found to be the ones who did this, and police are pinning the blame on others.

Note that the reports are all given out by police. The witnesses didn't have a chance to say anything at the shooting (as reported in my post above^^). The police stopped them.

This whole thing is probably a planned police execution of those dead and wounded, just to promote gun control in the nation.

[tvbcof]

And, of course, the '7/11' subway bombings in London fit the mold.  One private company had contracted with another private company to drill an event that and, by chance, the exact thing happened in 'real life' simultaneously.

9/11, 7/7, and 11/13 share another interesting similarity;  Passports.  Nice unblemished ones to be picked up in the street which makes 'investigations' fairly quick and easy.  So easy, in fact, that they can go straight to the press without all of the hassle and latency of going through the legal system.

IIRC, the 7/7 tube bombings were especially nice in this regard.  So much so that two copies of at least one of the evildoer's passport were recovered.

[WaterSupply]

This mass shooting is again not surprising.

This one does seem kind of different. President Obama seems to think that this could actually be islamist or ISIS violence. The suspects do seem to have muslim names.... so there may be some truth to this view.

What do you guys think?

[BADecker]

Obama White House: Terrorists Will Stop Attacking if We Pass Gun Control Laws


   <<< Click the picture.

Reporter Peter Doocy asked White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest: “Does the President really think that common sense gun laws would deter terrorists now that he has admitted that these two may have been terrorists?”

“Yes. The president believes that passing common sense gun laws that makes it harder for people with bad intentions to get guns, makes the country safer,” responded Earnest.

“But so the president thinks that when there are potentially two terrorists sitting around planning a mass murder they may call it off because President Obama has put in place common sense gun laws?” Doocy shot back.

“Why wouldn’t we make it harder for them? What’s the explanation for that?” responded Earnest.

The Obama White House is essentially arguing that passing more gun laws which disarm law-abiding citizens will somehow make jihadists, who have access to international terrorist contacts and back-door weapons smuggling rings, less determined and less capable of carrying out massacres.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/obama-white-house-terrorists-will-stop-attacking-if-we-pass-gun-control-laws.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90brlna4YXI

[galdur]

Most sane people feel thoroughly terrorized by the California attack I´m sure, yet the idiots in charge of the country and the yokels investigating this mass murder are racking their brains about whether this should be defined as a terrorist act or not. Un freakin believable. Is it really safe to have these people running around freely without adult supervision?

[BADecker]

Most sane people feel thoroughly terrorized by the California attack I´m sure, yet the idiots in charge of the country and the yokels investigating this mass murder are racking their brains about whether this should be defined as a terrorist act or not. Un freakin believable. Is it really safe to have these people running around freely without adult supervision?

That's why we elect them to office... so we know right where they are at all times.

[BADecker]

San Bernardino shooting: US divided over whether attack was terrorism

Even before the facts of the San Bernardino mass shooting are in, a familiar argument is dividing Americans along political, religious and racial lines: was this terrorism? The rightwing news site Breitbart.com wasted little time describing Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik as the "jihadis next door", even before initial reports emerged that the couple may have visited radical Islamist websites and had unspecified forms of contact with people being investigated for links to extremist groups. Other outlets preferred to focus on the fact that Farook worked for the county public health department whose holiday party was targeted without immediately assuming his religion or political beliefs had anything to do with it.

Across social media sites, people asked if the "T-word" would have been invoked so quickly if the couple were white Christians instead of brown-skinned Muslims. Some saw a double standard between the way events in San Bernardino have been characterized and last weekend's murders at Planned Parenthood in Colorado Springs, whose alleged perpetrator was notoriously described in the New York Times as a "gentle loner", not a terrorist, despite the apparent political motivation behind his attack.

More at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/dec/04/san-bernardino-shooting-america-divided-terrorism.

[BADecker]

When Shooting Narratives Diverge

Free-Market Analysis: Another horrible attack by armed gunmen against unarmed civilians. This one, once more in the US, has left a significant toll of wounded and dead – and was covered in detail by the major media on television and by the alternative media on the Internet. In fact, minutes after the shooting began, tweets, videos and posts filled the alternative news media with a blizzard of accusations.

It was a false flag, alternative media commentators declared, orchestrated by shadowy forces in or around the US government. One more shooting intended to boost arguments for gun control. Mainstream journalism couldn't be trusted. The attack would be blamed on terrorists somehow and the results would be more broadsides against dwindling civil liberties.

Certainly suspicions of terrorism seemed generally prevalent, and not just in the alternative media. Mainstream media reports speculated on the reasons for the shooting and the individuals involved.

After a concentrated stream of reports, prevalent wisdom seemed to settle on a narrative that included two or three shooters. One was identified as Syed Farook and another as a woman, Tashfeen Malik.

Read more http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/36673/When-Shooting-Narratives-Diverge/.

[MakingMoneyHoney]

They're trying to make people afraid. Yeah, the shootings will stop as soon as you give up your gun rights, because that's all the terrorist president wants, and he'll stop terrorizing you if you give him your weapons....

[galdur]

They're trying to make people afraid. Yeah, the shootings will stop as soon as you give up your gun rights, because that's all the terrorist president wants, and he'll stop terrorizing you if you give him your weapons....

Every time that Obama goes on TV and talks gun control, gun sales spike so that isn´t working so well.

They´re much more interested in calling rampant terrorism in the United States (350 mass shootings with four victims or more this year) something else so they can say. See how great a job we are doing in protecting you from terrorists. Now give us more money, we deserve it and we can protect you even better.

[BADecker]

As I have said at another time, mass shootings are like 1 or 2 jokers shooting down a bunch of unarmed people. When cops do it, it is usually a bunch of cops shooting down 1 unarmed person.

[BADecker]

San Bernardino Hoax: One Shoot Out, Two Locations

Obviously this shooting did not happen the way they say it did, and the massive pounce on the “Islamic terror” meme strongly implies to me that the establishment needs huge public support for something horrible they plan to do soon. And I really think Trump’s bantering about “dancing Muslims” was the precursor to this, I think he knew this was going to go down and seeded the public conscience ahead of this storm to cause the hatred to grow when watered . . . . and with headlines like [urlhttp://nypost.com/2015/12/03/muslim-newlyweds-slaughter-coworkers-who-threw-them-a-baby-shower/]“Muslim newlyweds slaughter co-workers who threw them a baby shower”[/url] (thanks anonymous for that tip) well, I think there is a little proof.

...

The dead woman is in high heels, shorts and short blouse. No blood anywhere after being filled with bullets.

Read more at:

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=125654

http://centraltruth.tk/2015/12/04/san-bernardino-hoax-one-shoot-out-two-locations/

http://centraltruth.tk/2015/12/05/san-bernardino-shooting-attacker-pledged-allegiance-to-isis-officials-say/

[BADecker]

Witness to San Bernardino Massacre Describes Shooters:

...

"Mrs. Abdelmageed, can you describe to me in as much details as you can what did the gunman look like?" the CBS anchor asks.

"I couldn't see his face, he had a black hat on. All I could see was a black hat, black long-sleeved shirt...
He had extra ammo. He was probably ready for something, to reload - I don't know know..."

"I just saw three, dressed exactly the same." They looked like they were athletic build, and um, they appeared to be tall..."

"You're certain that you saw three men?" the news anchor asks.

...

Read more:

http://popularliberty.com/12455/witness-san-bernardino-shooting-describes-three-white-men-dressed-military-attire-cbs-news

http://whatreallyhappened.com/content/witness-san-bernardino-shooting-describes-three-white-men-dressed-military-attire#axzz3tiqflEQp

http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/witness-describes-the-san-bernardino-shooting/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s45OeXNRZng

[BADecker]

Attorney for Family in San Bernardino Shooting

After the tragic shooting in California this week, those close to the case have been finding giant holes in the "official narrative."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51h_o8y4GpA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qZ1zDO0v4o

[MakingMoneyHoney]

San Bernardino Hoax: One Shoot Out, Two Locations

I believe it was fake, that they planted the truck with guns shots there. (shots from the front when no police were in front of it either, and the "blood" was blue on the ground) There's a playlist here. But that first pic is a telephoto lens and the white lines look like dots because the camera is getting a lot of distance in that pic. ProfessorDoom pointed it out.

It may be the same place in the pics, but the truck they were following never got there, through all the cop cars and running police, lol.

And yeah... guy describes them as 3 men with long sleeve shirts, why is the one man on the ground with short sleeve shirts, how did he mistake a woman for a man with a long sleeve shirt on?

[zenitzz]

Let me get this straight we have two shooters who were prepared with assault weapons and explosives! He went to a party got upset went home got his wife/girlfriend got his and hers assault weapons and explosives they just happen to have handy went back and killed 14 people and wounded a number more! Then escaped and did not run but stayed around the area and then got in a shootout with police and got killed and people want to call this work place violence?

[MakingMoneyHoney]

Let me get this straight we have two shooters who were prepared with assault weapons and explosives! He went to a party got upset went home got his wife/girlfriend got his and hers assault weapons and explosives they just happen to have handy went back and killed 14 people and wounded a number more! Then escaped and did not run but stayed around the area and then got in a shootout with police and got killed and people want to call this work place violence?

Please feel free to vote in my "Do you think the San Bernardino shooting was a False Flag?" thread if you haven't already.


Yes, the public is led to believe they somehow had the foresight to booby trap things when they supposedly got upset at the spur of the moment. Any planning makes this not spur of the moment, so which is it? If you were free from the cops, don't you think you'd get farther than a couple of miles in a couple of hours? The city had prepared in monthly drills for something like this, had one actually going on at the time and they still failed miserably? It makes no sense but the public is buying it, hook, line and sinker.

[BADecker]

Let me get this straight we have two shooters who were prepared with assault weapons and explosives! He went to a party got upset went home got his wife/girlfriend got his and hers assault weapons and explosives they just happen to have handy went back and killed 14 people and wounded a number more! Then escaped and did not run but stayed around the area and then got in a shootout with police and got killed and people want to call this work place violence?

Please feel free to vote in my "Do you think the San Bernardino shooting was a False Flag?" thread if you haven't already.


Yes, the public is led to believe they somehow had the foresight to booby trap things when they supposedly got upset at the spur of the moment. Any planning makes this not spur of the moment, so which is it? If you were free from the cops, don't you think you'd get farther than a couple of miles in a couple of hours? The city had prepared in monthly drills for something like this, had one actually going on at the time and they still failed miserably? It makes no sense but the public is buying it, hook, line and sinker.

And the bad part is that many people will look at it once, and never return for any followup. So, they will walk away with the idea that it was a Muslim terrorist thing.

People need to understand that it either is planned and carried out by government people, or it is allowed by them, no matter what it is.

Even Pearl Harbor was allowed to happen by FDR, who knew of the plans of the Japs at least 2 weeks ahead of time. Virtually all the terrorist actions done in America since then have been allowed or cause by people in the American government. And the media is right in government's pocket, proclaiming it to the American masses just the way the government wants the people to believe.

Thank Goodness that we have the Internet so that we can see through many of the government's coverups.

[galdur]

I´m always suspicious since I witnessed 9/11 on live TV and saw the ready script virtually from minute five. It was unbelievable propaganda. Clearly scripted beforehand because they all had the same shit. They had the ready-made villains and the ready "experts". Strangely enough they had about the whole story (which seemed pretty complex to me)  all wrapped up by the end of the day, also how two jetliners weighing altogether 300 tons managed to reduce Three Out of Two skyscrapers weighing altogether 1,250,000 tons practically to dust in seconds. It was kerosene. Right.

And since then I don´t believe much from official/garbage media sources when these terror events are concerned. In fact I don´t believe a freakin thing that comes from them on any issues. It could all be more or less staged for all I know. I guarantee you that if you automatically take 180% degrees position away from the govt. and media whores in everything they say, you´ll be right at least 75% of the time on average and that without even needing to think at all.