Bitcoin Forum
October 19, 2017, 10:12:26 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.0.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: A flaw in bitcoin, if it became widely adopted 21m bitcoins, 7b people on planet  (Read 3051 times)
jonald_fyookball
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political


View Profile
December 03, 2015, 07:14:04 PM
 #41


21 million bitcoins. Would mean that if it became widespread no one human could ever have a 'full' coin but it could be spent in smaller denominations.
Jacob

That's the whole point of why it might be very smart to buy one now while a whole BTC is attainable.  The fixed supply is part of what makes it an attractive investment.

1508451146
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508451146

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508451146
Reply with quote  #2

1508451146
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1508451146
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508451146

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508451146
Reply with quote  #2

1508451146
Report to moderator
1508451146
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508451146

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1508451146
Reply with quote  #2

1508451146
Report to moderator
DarkHyudrA
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386


English <-> Portuguese translations


View Profile
December 03, 2015, 07:28:49 PM
 #42

The only real problem is that with miner fees.
If we have mass adoption, rise in price, what will happen to the fees and output priority?

English <-> Brazilian Portuguese translations
ranochigo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232

In the midst of an exam, will be very inactive.


View Profile WWW
December 04, 2015, 02:06:05 AM
 #43

If it later feels like its too less.. its no problem at all to split satoshis into 0.1 and 0.01 more..

This would require a hard fork. Also if 1 satoshi would be worth something significant we might also consider changing mining schedule to go beyond 2140 - that is make the block reward keep halving into fractional satoshis. This would effect how the last few satoshis are mined, but would have no significant impact on the ~21 million total BTC.

Are you sure it would need a fork? I would think that all it would need would be that everyone update his Bitcoin client.

Smiley
I'm not a technical person. However, if the denominations start to go below satoshi, the new client would implement this and if miners mine the blocks with transactions below satoshi, it would create a fork. The newer clients will agree and the older client would disagree. This would create a fork.
The only real problem is that with miner fees.
If we have mass adoption, rise in price, what will happen to the fees and output priority?
The relay fees would probably decrease. The transaction fee the miners want to accept is totally up to them. I would imagine that the transaction priority relaying limit would decrease and the block size would increase in the near future. The blocks can then have more free transactions.














 

 

█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
BitBlender 

 













 















 












 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
█ 
fastdice_alchemist
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56

Try out - fastdice.com - for fast bitcoin gaming!


View Profile WWW
December 04, 2015, 03:58:20 AM
 #44

Well currently, money/currency is not evenly distributed at all. If we were to evenly distribute 21m bitcoins to 7b people it would around 0.003 each, but thats never going to happen because no one has the same amount of currency.


But it will be looooongggg before we reach 21m bitcoins.

Check out fastdice.com now!
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456


View Profile
December 04, 2015, 06:02:43 AM
 #45

If it later feels like its too less.. its no problem at all to split satoshis into 0.1 and 0.01 more..

This would require a hard fork. Also if 1 satoshi would be worth something significant we might also consider changing mining schedule to go beyond 2140 - that is make the block reward keep halving into fractional satoshis. This would effect how the last few satoshis are mined, but would have no significant impact on the ~21 million total BTC.

Are you sure it would need a fork? I would think that all it would need would be that everyone update his Bitcoin client.

Smiley
I'm not a technical person. However, if the denominations start to go below satoshi, the new client would implement this and if miners mine the blocks with transactions below satoshi, it would create a fork. The newer clients will agree and the older client would disagree. This would create a fork.
The only real problem is that with miner fees.
If we have mass adoption, rise in price, what will happen to the fees and output priority?
The relay fees would probably decrease. The transaction fee the miners want to accept is totally up to them. I would imagine that the transaction priority relaying limit would decrease and the block size would increase in the near future. The blocks can then have more free transactions.

Changes in the client would be small.

The miners would be the first ones to upgrade their clients, because they are on the cutting edge, so to speak.

People who didn't upgrade simply wouldn't have their wallets updated when they received transactions smaller than their clients could handle... at least until the combined amounts for any single address reached 1 satoshi or more. And they wouldn't be able to send smaller amounts than 1 satoshi.

The latest Bitcoin core clients look for the best chain. They would still do this, even if they couldn't update the blocks with fractions of a satoshi. Why? Because the miners would still be using updated clients that would be indicating the best chain.

I, like you, can see that there might be problems. They should be able to be solved. If in the future, when miners were down to mining only 2 or 3 bitcoins per block, or if the whole block size process is going to be changed like Gavin wants, by then everyone will be using an updated client. Are there people who still use version 0.2.0 (we are a 0.11.2 right now)?

Smiley
piloder
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
December 28, 2015, 10:02:12 AM
 #46

Well currently, money/currency is not evenly distributed at all. If we were to evenly distribute 21m bitcoins to 7b people it would around 0.003 each, but thats never going to happen because no one has the same amount of currency.


But it will be looooongggg before we reach 21m bitcoins.

By the time of all the bitcoins are mined, there will be loss of many coins. We shall have around $16 million in 2140.

FORTUNEJACK.COM[
                             
9 BTC WELCOME PACK FOR 1ST 5 DEPOSITS
FREE 1,000 mBTC daily for LuckyJack winners
[
           
]
Jet Cash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672



View Profile WWW
December 28, 2015, 10:06:23 AM
 #47

Maybe they will introduce Bytecoin to cope with 8 times the volume. Smiley

Cheap domain names with free privacy and payment using Bitcoin
Click here for price details
Apply promo code - USEBITCOIN to save $1 on your first order
lumeire
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218



View Profile
December 29, 2015, 11:30:59 AM
 #48

Well currently, money/currency is not evenly distributed at all. If we were to evenly distribute 21m bitcoins to 7b people it would around 0.003 each, but thats never going to happen because no one has the same amount of currency.


But it will be looooongggg before we reach 21m bitcoins.

By the time of all the bitcoins are mined, there will be loss of many coins. We shall have around $16 million in 2140.

We won't even be around when that happens.

@ontopic, it's not much of our concern really. The BTC economy would fix itself, and adjust accordingly. It's supply and demand.

Patatas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966


Crypto-Games.net: Multiple coins, multiple games


View Profile
December 29, 2015, 11:39:39 AM
 #49

When I started with bitcoins I used to think the same but never thought of asking anyone since it would make look stupid.But after searching for a while on google,I'm convinced there is no limit as to the number of bitcoins available right now are sufficient to give everybody few satohsi's.Also not everybody needs 1 btc.

 

▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇
 
TibanneCat
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210


BTC > etc


View Profile
December 29, 2015, 11:51:28 AM
 #50

As most has said, it is not an issue
several places already show values in mBtc and as the price goes up, soon enough we will be calculating in satoshis as opposed to full BTCs

Think of commodities, aluminium is priced in tons but gold is priced in grams
Soros Shorts
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1585



View Profile
December 29, 2015, 11:59:31 AM
 #51

If it later feels like its too less.. its no problem at all to split satoshis into 0.1 and 0.01 more..

This would require a hard fork. Also if 1 satoshi would be worth something significant we might also consider changing mining schedule to go beyond 2140 - that is make the block reward keep halving into fractional satoshis. This would effect how the last few satoshis are mined, but would have no significant impact on the ~21 million total BTC.

Are you sure it would need a fork? I would think that all it would need would be that everyone update his Bitcoin client.

Smiley
I'm not a technical person. However, if the denominations start to go below satoshi, the new client would implement this and if miners mine the blocks with transactions below satoshi, it would create a fork. The newer clients will agree and the older client would disagree. This would create a fork.
The only real problem is that with miner fees.
If we have mass adoption, rise in price, what will happen to the fees and output priority?
The relay fees would probably decrease. The transaction fee the miners want to accept is totally up to them. I would imagine that the transaction priority relaying limit would decrease and the block size would increase in the near future. The blocks can then have more free transactions.

Changes in the client would be small.


The miners would be the first ones to upgrade their clients, because they are on the cutting edge, so to speak.

People who didn't upgrade simply wouldn't have their wallets updated when they received transactions smaller than their clients could handle... at least until the combined amounts for any single address reached 1 satoshi or more. And they wouldn't be able to send smaller amounts than 1 satoshi.

The latest Bitcoin core clients look for the best chain. They would still do this, even if they couldn't update the blocks with fractions of a satoshi. Why? Because the miners would still be using updated clients that would be indicating the best chain.

I, like you, can see that there might be problems. They should be able to be solved. If in the future, when miners were down to mining only 2 or 3 bitcoins per block, or if the whole block size process is going to be changed like Gavin wants, by then everyone will be using an updated client. Are there people who still use version 0.2.0 (we are a 0.11.2 right now)?

Smiley

Please explain how you can accomplish this with just small changes to the client when you need to redefine the representation of the value field of the TxOut data structure.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction#general_format_.28inside_a_block.29_of_each_input_of_a_transaction_-_Txin

Currently value is a 32-bit field and the smallest bit represents 1 Satoshi. If you add more bits to this field or modify it in any other way (to create a high resolution value with sub-Satoshi precision) you will change entire fabric of the Bitcoin network. If this is done in an uncoordinated way nodes/clients that only recognize the old 32-bit value would reject the new high resolution value.
BitUsher
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812


View Profile
December 29, 2015, 12:41:56 PM
 #52

Actually the fact that all bitcoins fit within 2**53 is quite a happy accident. It means that integer-satoshi amounts can be represented exactly by the IEEE decimal64 type, which provides one route towards practically infinite divisibility by using exact arbitrary-precision rational arithmetic and decimal64 for serialization.

Freicoin already implements arbitrary-precision internal arithmetic, and decimal64 support could be added by a new transaction serialization version. As others have mentioned though, there's not really a need until sub-satoshi amounts have any real-world value.
NorrisK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428



View Profile
December 29, 2015, 01:16:48 PM
 #53

Even if there were enough bitcoins around to hand everybody 1 bitcoin, that would not be how bitcoins would be distributed. Some people will be accumulating just like with fiat, while others end up holding nothing.

It's human nature that some people find a way to gain a lot of something, while others find a way to get rid of everything. We should accept that this can never be changed.

arthurminton
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 87

★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice


View Profile
December 29, 2015, 01:47:47 PM
 #54

you are getting the wrong idea dude, make bitcoin popular does not mean that everyone has to own a bitcoin. it means that everyone must know about bitcoin and if some problem occurs to them regarding transactions then they know about a reliable source such as bitcoin. the goal of the developer of bitcoin might not have been to remove bitcoin but to spread bitcoin as gold, gold is also limited but many people who can afford gold have gold in some form and even the elder illiterates know about gold. i might be wrong but this is what I thing bitcoin was invented for.

piloder
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714



View Profile
January 04, 2016, 07:59:33 PM
 #55

you are getting the wrong idea dude, make bitcoin popular does not mean that everyone has to own a bitcoin. it means that everyone must know about bitcoin and if some problem occurs to them regarding transactions then they know about a reliable source such as bitcoin. the goal of the developer of bitcoin might not have been to remove bitcoin but to spread bitcoin as gold, gold is also limited but many people who can afford gold have gold in some form and even the elder illiterates know about gold. i might be wrong but this is what I thing bitcoin was invented for.

That is the point. Many people do not own gold, but they know what the gold is. When crisis hit, they can buy gold.

FORTUNEJACK.COM[
                             
9 BTC WELCOME PACK FOR 1ST 5 DEPOSITS
FREE 1,000 mBTC daily for LuckyJack winners
[
           
]
Phil Astley
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11


View Profile
January 04, 2016, 08:28:38 PM
 #56

A quick calculation shows that if in 2140 all the btc is mined and the population sticks to the current 7bil then everyone on the planet would need 0.003btc for them to e evenly distributed; of course some people will have none and some will hold many and some will have a few, just enough to be considered wealthy.

I have 0.1btc right now and intend to get more, so I guess that would put me in the 1% in 2140?

Of course then you also have the lower value coins that people will have accrued including Dogecoin that apparently has no limits so there will likely be trillions of those floating around the internet and stuffed on antique quantum computers... Smiley

Donate here: 1FnjaPRMLyHVKkJeCARrr6YaTCj8CGoVo9
owm123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392


View Profile
January 04, 2016, 11:38:27 PM
 #57

Not everyone will be able to have 1 bitcoin. Even these days just 1 bitcoin is a goal for many, and its difficult to achieve with current prices.

Bitcoin is NOT anonymous: http://www.bitcoinisnotanonymous.com
LFC_Bitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134


★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!


View Profile
January 04, 2016, 11:49:44 PM
 #58

There are a maximum of 2,099,999,997,690,000 Bitcoin elements (called satoshis), which are currently most commonly measured in units of 100,000,000 known as BTC.

I think there are plenty of units to go around.

^^^^

/thread

YoonYeonghwa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 249


View Profile
January 04, 2016, 11:51:35 PM
 #59

You do know that not everyone is going to own 1 whole Bitcoin. You can own parts of Bitcoin as well. Maybe you didn't know that.

countryfree
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610

Your country may be your worst enemy


View Profile
January 05, 2016, 12:10:23 AM
 #60

This isn't a problem at all. BTC is just like everything else. Some people own 10 houses, but millions are homeless. Jay Leno owns more than 100 cars, while millions don't have any. This is the world we live in. BTC will change how we handle money, but it won't change the world.
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!