[ANN]✸✸✸ZETA2COIN✸✸✸ [ZET2] |✸✸✸ Q-U-A-R-K ✸✸✸|POS 99,52% | ICO BURNED NOW CHECK

[Splatters]

seems there's a party here! Do I need an invitation?

[1715610274]

1715610274

[1715610274]

1715610274

[1715610274]

1715610274

[1715610274]

1715610274

[okane818]

This is nice coin.

I smell like spirit that moves into high level.

I'm IN...


regards

-okane--

[TillKoeln]

so silent... boring

[MbccompanyX]

so silent... boring

maybe when kees will get up online he and the dev will start again debating on the fact that the dev refuses to clear the suspects

[wildduck]

Price little high, low buys on ico.

[--Z2C--]

Now is "blocks" : 2064
end POW 3000 Blocks

[--Z2C--]

Lots of errors in the code:

1) Max coinbase / supply is not 5 million, but unlimited. There is no limited on the total amount of coins.
2) Block mature time is not 10 confirmations, but 20 confirmations
3) PoS max coin age is not unlimited
4) Difficulty calculation does not fit the Quark algoritm
5) DNS seed node is described as local ip address
6) How do you explain the 1000+ blocks that are already mined? Premine?

Please explain all

1.Max coin supply  6.250.000
2.Block mature 20
3.Max stake age 1000 years
4)for quark diff. system wirte.
we not concern about pow we are more concern about pos .....
and this system will work fine...
5.DNS is VPS or 178.33.64.238:25589
6.POW started from 1000+ block , someone stole my code from Github, and decided to start yesterday, I see That someone Mining,  I mined for only 80+ block for test
my address premine Sf1xBgLJFkjQmHHeLdGQSPF2cqWgi5Xasu

[vlom]

so silent... boring

we all run out off popcorn. so the silence is good.

[cashundone]

http://mine.justpools.uk/ - bad pool
found 0 blocks

[--Z2C--]

POW ended

[--Z2C--]

***Raspberry-pi Wallet ZET2***

https://github.com/ZETA2COIN/ZET2-Wallet-Raspberry-pi

[MbccompanyX]

***Raspberry-pi Wallet ZET2***

https://github.com/ZETA2COIN/ZET2-Wallet-Raspberry-pi

But it should work on all the models or only the Pi 2 B? All the times i see a coin having a raspberry-pi version of the wallet seems limited to the 2 B

[--Z2C--]

[keesdewit]

Lots of errors in the code:

1) Max coinbase / supply is not 5 million, but unlimited. There is no limited on the total amount of coins.
2) Block mature time is not 10 confirmations, but 20 confirmations
3) PoS max coin age is not unlimited
4) Difficulty calculation does not fit the Quark algoritm
5) DNS seed node is described as local ip address
6) How do you explain the 1000+ blocks that are already mined? Premine?

Please explain all

1.Max coin supply  6.250.000
2.Block mature 20
3.Max stake age 1000 years
4)for quark diff. system wirte.
we not concern about pow we are more concern about pos .....
and this system will work fine...
5.DNS is VPS or 178.33.64.238:25589
6.POW started from 1000+ block , someone stole my code from Github, and decided to start yesterday, I see That someone Mining,  I mined for only 80+ block for test
my address premine Sf1xBgLJFkjQmHHeLdGQSPF2cqWgi5Xasu

Your coin supply is unlimited!


You say that it is limited to 6.250.000 but it is not. BTW Thanks for finally answering my questions.

[ocminer]

1. He does not care - he is just after the ICO funds.
2. He does not care and also has no clue how to fix it.
3. He just doesn't care

[GeorgeAurea]

so silent... boring

maybe when kees will get up online he and the dev will start again debating on the fact that the dev refuses to clear the suspects

"Debating" you say? 

In my opinion, immature and unprofessional rantings, on both sides. Devs acting as such, are hurting the image of their own coin, and the image of alts in general.

[keesdewit]

so silent... boring

maybe when kees will get up online he and the dev will start again debating on the fact that the dev refuses to clear the suspects

"Debating" you say? 

In my opinion, immature and unprofessional rantings, on both sides. Devs acting as such, are hurting the image of their own coin, and the image of alts in general.

I wasnt very friendly I have to admit. But he could just answer the questions in the first place.

[GeorgeAurea]

so silent... boring

maybe when kees will get up online he and the dev will start again debating on the fact that the dev refuses to clear the suspects

"Debating" you say? 

In my opinion, immature and unprofessional rantings, on both sides. Devs acting as such, are hurting the image of their own coin, and the image of alts in general.

I wasnt very friendly I have to admit. But he could just answer the questions in the first place.

Likewise, you could have stepped out. It is commendable by pointing out flaws, though at some point one would have to let it go in my opinion.

If the dev of this coin was serious about it, he would have embraced it, or any other comments regarding.

[keesdewit]

so silent... boring

maybe when kees will get up online he and the dev will start again debating on the fact that the dev refuses to clear the suspects

"Debating" you say? 

In my opinion, immature and unprofessional rantings, on both sides. Devs acting as such, are hurting the image of their own coin, and the image of alts in general.

I wasnt very friendly I have to admit. But he could just answer the questions in the first place.

Likewise, you could have stepped out. It is commendable by pointing out flaws, though at some point one would have to let it go in my opinion.

If the dev of this coin was serious about it, he would have embraced it, or any other comments regarding.

Yes, think your right.

[ocminer]

It's the tactics of those 'Devs' to simply ignore the legit questions or problems and post as much as they can so the "bad news" are soon to be on an older page so users don't see that anymore...

It's done with many coins this way... once they have a fresh page they keep on doing there thing. ..