Splatters
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 1400+ Coins Exchange
|
|
December 15, 2015, 08:11:40 PM |
|
seems there's a party here! Do I need an invitation?
|
I know why your pray will never be answered!
|
|
|
okane818
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 15, 2015, 10:19:51 PM |
|
This is nice coin.
I smell like spirit that moves into high level.
I'm IN...
regards
-okane--
|
|
|
|
TillKoeln
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1051
unnamed.Exchange, join the Cool Kids!!!
|
|
December 16, 2015, 09:33:59 AM |
|
so silent... boring
|
|
|
|
MbccompanyX
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
December 16, 2015, 09:36:24 AM |
|
so silent... boring
maybe when kees will get up online he and the dev will start again debating on the fact that the dev refuses to clear the suspects
|
|
|
|
wildduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
|
|
December 16, 2015, 11:13:35 AM |
|
Price little high, low buys on ico.
|
|
|
|
--Z2C-- (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
December 16, 2015, 11:21:15 AM |
|
Now is "blocks" : 2064 end POW 3000 Blocks
|
|
|
|
--Z2C-- (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
December 16, 2015, 12:18:40 PM |
|
Lots of errors in the code:
1) Max coinbase / supply is not 5 million, but unlimited. There is no limited on the total amount of coins. 2) Block mature time is not 10 confirmations, but 20 confirmations 3) PoS max coin age is not unlimited 4) Difficulty calculation does not fit the Quark algoritm 5) DNS seed node is described as local ip address 6) How do you explain the 1000+ blocks that are already mined? Premine?
Please explain all
1.Max coin supply 6.250.000 2.Block mature 20 3.Max stake age 1000 years 4)for quark diff. system wirte. we not concern about pow we are more concern about pos ..... and this system will work fine... 5.DNS is VPS or 178.33.64.238:25589 6.POW started from 1000+ block , someone stole my code from Github, and decided to start yesterday, I see That someone Mining, I mined for only 80+ block for test my address premine Sf1xBgLJFkjQmHHeLdGQSPF2cqWgi5Xasu
|
|
|
|
vlom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117
|
|
December 16, 2015, 04:53:04 PM |
|
so silent... boring
we all run out off popcorn. so the silence is good.
|
|
|
|
|
--Z2C-- (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
December 16, 2015, 07:18:34 PM |
|
POW ended
|
|
|
|
--Z2C-- (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
December 16, 2015, 07:37:51 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
MbccompanyX
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
December 16, 2015, 07:39:21 PM |
|
But it should work on all the models or only the Pi 2 B? All the times i see a coin having a raspberry-pi version of the wallet seems limited to the 2 B
|
|
|
|
--Z2C-- (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
December 16, 2015, 08:06:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
keesdewit
|
|
December 16, 2015, 09:03:44 PM Last edit: December 16, 2015, 09:34:41 PM by keesdewit |
|
Lots of errors in the code:
1) Max coinbase / supply is not 5 million, but unlimited. There is no limited on the total amount of coins. 2) Block mature time is not 10 confirmations, but 20 confirmations 3) PoS max coin age is not unlimited 4) Difficulty calculation does not fit the Quark algoritm 5) DNS seed node is described as local ip address 6) How do you explain the 1000+ blocks that are already mined? Premine?
Please explain all
1.Max coin supply 6.250.000 2.Block mature 20 3.Max stake age 1000 years 4)for quark diff. system wirte. we not concern about pow we are more concern about pos ..... and this system will work fine... 5.DNS is VPS or 178.33.64.238:25589 6.POW started from 1000+ block , someone stole my code from Github, and decided to start yesterday, I see That someone Mining, I mined for only 80+ block for test my address premine Sf1xBgLJFkjQmHHeLdGQSPF2cqWgi5Xasu Your coin supply is unlimited!You say that it is limited to 6.250.000 but it is not. BTW Thanks for finally answering my questions.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
December 16, 2015, 09:09:26 PM |
|
1. He does not care - he is just after the ICO funds. 2. He does not care and also has no clue how to fix it. 3. He just doesn't care
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
GeorgeAurea
|
|
December 16, 2015, 09:19:35 PM |
|
so silent... boring
maybe when kees will get up online he and the dev will start again debating on the fact that the dev refuses to clear the suspects "Debating" you say? In my opinion, immature and unprofessional rantings, on both sides. Devs acting as such, are hurting the image of their own coin, and the image of alts in general.
|
|
|
|
keesdewit
|
|
December 16, 2015, 09:36:36 PM |
|
so silent... boring
maybe when kees will get up online he and the dev will start again debating on the fact that the dev refuses to clear the suspects "Debating" you say? In my opinion, immature and unprofessional rantings, on both sides. Devs acting as such, are hurting the image of their own coin, and the image of alts in general. I wasnt very friendly I have to admit. But he could just answer the questions in the first place.
|
|
|
|
GeorgeAurea
|
|
December 16, 2015, 09:50:51 PM |
|
so silent... boring
maybe when kees will get up online he and the dev will start again debating on the fact that the dev refuses to clear the suspects "Debating" you say? In my opinion, immature and unprofessional rantings, on both sides. Devs acting as such, are hurting the image of their own coin, and the image of alts in general. I wasnt very friendly I have to admit. But he could just answer the questions in the first place. Likewise, you could have stepped out. It is commendable by pointing out flaws, though at some point one would have to let it go in my opinion. If the dev of this coin was serious about it, he would have embraced it, or any other comments regarding.
|
|
|
|
keesdewit
|
|
December 16, 2015, 09:53:12 PM |
|
so silent... boring
maybe when kees will get up online he and the dev will start again debating on the fact that the dev refuses to clear the suspects "Debating" you say? In my opinion, immature and unprofessional rantings, on both sides. Devs acting as such, are hurting the image of their own coin, and the image of alts in general. I wasnt very friendly I have to admit. But he could just answer the questions in the first place. Likewise, you could have stepped out. It is commendable by pointing out flaws, though at some point one would have to let it go in my opinion. If the dev of this coin was serious about it, he would have embraced it, or any other comments regarding. Yes, think your right.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
December 16, 2015, 10:13:53 PM |
|
It's the tactics of those 'Devs' to simply ignore the legit questions or problems and post as much as they can so the "bad news" are soon to be on an older page so users don't see that anymore...
It's done with many coins this way... once they have a fresh page they keep on doing there thing. ..
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
|