[lee group]1150$! The group buy of hosted bitmain S7 @4.73T online on 27th Jan!!

[mxnsch]

Li if you decided to leave the hosting business let me here to counter propose you another option, i.e. transfer all my miners to BW B16 hashrates with 1:1 ratio

I would also accept that.

[wlefever]

Li if you decided to leave the hosting business let me here to counter propose you another option, i.e. transfer all my miners to BW B16 hashrates with 1:1 ratio

I would also accept that.

That would be an awesome deal, but what is his tie to BW? 

[pcfli]

it is also acceptable, i buy all s7 back according to the hosted s7 price on hashnest, currently the s7 price on hashnest is 0.0002/ GHS
so each s7@4730G=0.95 btc

[sky_g]

it is also acceptable, i buy all s7 back according to the hosted s7 price on hashnest, currently the s7 price on hashnest is 0.0002/ GHS
so each s7@4730G=0.95 btc

Hi Li,

When you sold S7 to us it was well above market price and you was ready to drop the price because you  mentioned that we signed the contract with company and can not reduce the price. I host 6 S7 with you for which i spend (16 BTC for first two in Dec and more than 12 BTC for next 4). I am well short of my investment . Do you think so this offer is acceptable for me ?

[mxnsch]

it is also acceptable, i buy all s7 back according to the hosted s7 price on hashnest, currently the s7 price on hashnest is 0.0002/ GHS
so each s7@4730G=0.95 btc

I think it's simply not acceptable at this point. You might keep in mind that you wanted to switch your business to OTC and it's your duty to make it as smooth and fair as possible for your existing customers. Otherwise you are gambling with your reputation for a couple of BTC.

You heard a couple of very reasonable offers by your customers now, please honor them and refund as sincere and fair as you did in the past for the delay and downtimes.
 

[sky_g]

Currently for my 6 S7 speed is 20 THS . It is same for many weeks now.

It is getting worst day by day.

Li If you think you want to go out of Hosting business let us know rather than we are in limbo where we do not have any clue.

If the issue is with S7 quality then issue has to be for every S7 not only to S7 which was supplied to you.

[superbull]

It is getting worst day by day.

Another 4.73 is getting crazy today, he is forcing people to leave the game, SHAME.

[superbull]

The root problem i believe is they (li and partners) has recently adding too many miners in the DC causing too high temperature and power overload, as i said before everytime we hv power outage BW will drop a hugh amount of hashrates at same time, whenever BW adding more hashrates we will suffer as well. Don't we see BW has added 30P more hashrates since last Monday?

[superbull]

Spent 7 btc for a 4.66 and 23 btc for the 4.73, paid total 7.2149 hosting fees, 3.0926 compensation rec'd, adding up all payouts from pools and what so called 0.92 buy back money finally i realize i loss 11 btc for this fucking hosting, the biggest loss i ever seen since i started mining in 2014, wtf

[sky_g]

Spent 7 btc for a 4.66 and 23 btc for the 4.73, paid total 7.2149 hosting fees, 3.0926 compensation rec'd, adding up all payouts from pools and what so called 0.92 buy back money finally i realize i loss 11 btc for this fucking hosting, the biggest loss i ever seen since i started mining in 2014, wtf

Same here with all my calculation i will well above 11 BTC + .  In terms of compensation according to Li if he do not aware of any official hosting down then it is not down time.

[chup]

Hosting was started with agreement that at customer request miners and PSUs will be sent to it's owners with a reasonable shipping price. So there is no place for desperate posts about loses. If somebody is not satisfied with renting performance it can ask for shipping price. But, in a case of cancelling renting agreement from Lee, fair offer would be shipping expenses to be covered by himself, that would cover not-mining shipping period.

[sky_g]

Hosting was started with agreement that at customer request miners and PSUs will be sent to it's owners with a reasonable shipping price. So there is no place for desperate posts about loses. If somebody is not satisfied with renting performance it can ask for shipping price. But, in a case of cancelling renting agreement from Lee, A

Hosting agreement started on basis to provide good hosting which Lee not providing as per agreement. We paid more than market rate for S7 not because we have more money to spend but on promise to get good service. Does he gave the good services for last 100 days ?

About buy back option or giving PPS income options came  directly form lee so what's wrong about posting loses in forum.

so Mr:Chup  Above option is given by Lee and if any one not happy about and loosing BTC which is his hard earn money (Not sure about you) he is entitled to put what he/she like.

As per your comment "fair offer would be shipping expenses to be covered by himself, that would cover not-mining shipping period."   So there is no place for desperate posts about loses.

[alienesb]

it is also acceptable, i buy all s7 back according to the hosted s7 price on hashnest, currently the s7 price on hashnest is 0.0002/ GHS
so each s7@4730G=0.95 btc

Shoot that BTC over when you get a chance. Thanks for a almost two years of good hosting!

Quick edit: Li sent over the BTC and we're square. Luckily I have not had the issues some have had and can say only good things about my experience with Li the past two years. Keep in mind I used F2pool and that certainly contributed to the stability and uptime I'm sure.

[chup]

Hosting agreement started on basis to provide good hosting which Lee not providing as per agreement. We paid more than market rate for S7 not because we have more money to spend but on promise to get good service. Does he gave the good services for last 100 days ?

About buy back option or giving PPS income options came  directly form lee so what's wrong about posting loses in forum.

so Mr:Chup  Above option is given by Lee and if any one not happy about and loosing BTC which is his hard earn money (Not sure about you) he is entitled to put what he/she like.

As per your comment "fair offer would be shipping expenses to be covered by himself, that would cover not-mining shipping period."  So there is no place for desperate posts about loses.

Last 100 days for my miners are perfect. Mining on F2pool and Antpool. If You mine on pools out of China with China based hosting, You can expect outages. I had big problem in my first 100 days. Defective S7 that was returned to factory. 25 days off. Who's loss is bigger? In a first 100 days or last 100 days? So stop panicking around and prepare downtime calculation for compensation, You know that Lee compensates Your type of downtime, don't You?

[sky_g]

Hosting agreement started on basis to provide good hosting which Lee not providing as per agreement. We paid more than market rate for S7 not because we have more money to spend but on promise to get good service. Does he gave the good services for last 100 days ?

About buy back option or giving PPS income options came  directly form lee so what's wrong about posting loses in forum.

so Mr:Chup  Above option is given by Lee and if any one not happy about and loosing BTC which is his hard earn money (Not sure about you) he is entitled to put what he/she like.

As per your comment "fair offer would be shipping expenses to be covered by himself, that would cover not-mining shipping period."  So there is no place for desperate posts about loses.

Last 100 days for my miners are perfect. Mining on F2pool and Antpool. If You mine on pools out of China with China based hosting, You can expect outages. I had big problem in my first 100 days. Defective S7 that was returned to factory. 25 days off. Who's loss is bigger? In a first 100 days or last 100 days? So stop panicking around and prepare downtime calculation for compensation, You know that Lee compensates Your type of downtime, don't You?

He compensate only if Lee aware of any outage not individual machine (Still website is down)

Agreement never says  you have to us F2pool or Antpool (Both are cheaters any way) .

I still trust Lee but he need to sort his act to reply to emails and keep note of down time of each machines.

If he want get out of hosting then he need to compensate to recover their money (sorry Chup i have to say this as i am not rich as you are)

[chup]

He compensate only if Lee aware of any outage not individual machine (Still website is down)

Simply not true. That's why You are receiving e-mail to claim YOUR miner downtime. But miner, not pools. You did bad choice of pools regarding geo-position of miner. It's Your choice.
BTW, never enough money. That's why I'm not considering myself as moneywise rich.

[superbull]

People say China miners must mine at China pool and this is not true, GFW increase latency not blocking any well known bitcoin ports e.g. 3333, 8333, 9332, 9333 etc.
People (indeed li said) i mine at pools outside China causing problems and this is not true at all, i'm connecting Slush pool via their CN node that is 100% China pool.
I'm a CxIE with 20xxx number I know internet well, you people always been misled by the Chinese, GFW is simply a hardware firewall with deep packet inspection functionality that's all.

[chup]

People say China miners must mine at China pool and this is not true, GFW increase latency not blocking any well known bitcoin ports e.g. 3333, 8333, 9332, 9333 etc.
People (indeed li said) i mine at pools outside China causing problems and this is not true at all, i'm connecting Slush pool via their CN node that is 100% China pool.
I'm a CxIE with 20xxx number I know internet well, you people always been misled by the Chinese, GFW is simply a hardware firewall with deep packet inspection functionality that's all.

Did You claimed Your downtime?

EDIT: Because You know so much I'm interested in technology of distributed mining - does pools that have more access nodes do have separate wallets or they just proxy from access nodes to one point?

[superbull]

Mar 03 1645 ~ Mar 05 1545   4 x S7@4.73   47 hours x 4 units = total 188 hours      s702 s703 s704 s705
Mar 06 1640 ~ Mar 07 1041   4 x S7@4.73   16 hours x 4 units = total 64 hours              s702 s703 s704 s705
Mar 27 0830 ~ 1800      8 x S7      9.5 hours x 8 units = total 76 hours      all
Apr 04 1930 ~ Apr 06 1100   3 x S7@4.73   39.5 hours x 3 units = total 118.5 hours           s7f s7g s7h
Apr 11 0715 ~ 1735      8 x S7      10 hours x 8 units = total 80 hours              all
Apr 15 0616 ~ 1050      1 x S7@4.73   4.5 hours                               s7f
Apr 18 1117 ~ 1331      1 x S7@4.66   2 hours                          s7a
Apr 21 2256 ~ Apr 22 0830   1 x S7@4.73   9.5 hours                               s7e
Apr 22 0956 ~ 1200      1 x S7@4.73   2 hours                          s7d

====================

May 09 1345 ~ 1925      1 x S7@4.73   5.5 hours !!!                       s7b 1/3 hashrates
May 13 1340 ~ May 14 1055   1 x S7@4.73   21 hours                               s7g
May 16 1615 ~ May 17 0235   1 x S7@4.73   10 hours                               s7b
May 17 0930 ~ 1325      1 x S7@4.73   4 hours                          s7b


s7a is a 4.66 others are 4.73, didn't take records before Mar 03 and i stopped taking record aftrer May 17 as i'm too tired with this hosting.
i claimed downtime that's why i rec'd compensation of total 3.0926 (included the 1.6688 rec'd on Jan 30 for online delay)

EDIT: network engineer is not a coder, network engineer always troubleshoot with span port and packet analyzer doesn't mean he is capable in developing a protocol suite by himself

[mxnsch]

I am out, happy to be able to focus on more productive stuff now.