Homosexuality is caused by being molested

[Balthazar]

Interesting theory. I dont think i have any gay friends (in my country they are still mostly hiding as they should) to ask them, but i guess OP could be somewhat right. In my opinion, molesting could be one of reasons but not only one. Some ppl simply are genetically screwed and some become gay from other reasons. I guess, most of them could be treated and cured if their genes are not to messed up.

There is no cure. That's why they're hiding. They are terrified of you finding out the truth. They should be.

That's not true. Homosexuality is just a mental desease, no different from schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, it can be treated and even cured. There are many experimental practices with significant history of success since the beginning of 20th century. Unfortunately, nobody is interested in providing the treatment services to these people... And even worse, they're proseciting scientists for any publications on that subject. Majority of establishment prefer to ignore this problem, pretending that it's just a variation of norm. I wonder why they aren't pretending that schizophrenia is a variation of norm.

Everybody should be provided with sufficient medical assistance. At least, some information about this disease should be made available to the general public. It's currently available only in the scientific research papers, but not everybody is able to understand scientific narrative. I think it's obvious that current situation is nothing but a blatant violation of fundamental human rights.

[1715538075]

1715538075

[jt byte]

I doubt being gay is thru a molested thing, that is just stupid. If you someone falls in love the same gender as him/her that is just how you are and not thru moestation.
People who do porn also fuck there same gender is there job, so is not a molested.

[PrikiNo.1]

Back on topic: HIV and AIDS actually started from monkeys. It's very likely that some homosexuals, who usually practice very strange sexual behavior, had sex with monkeys and that's how it started to spread.

The first transmission of HIV from monkeys (most probably gorillas) to humans occurred in Kinshasa, Belgian Congo in the 1920s. And no. It wasn't caused by the Congolese having sex with infected gorillas. Back then, the natives used to hunt gorillas for food. On one such occasion, the blood from a dying gorilla came in to contact with an open wound which was present in one of the native poachers. That's how it all started.

Mate, do you really think that AIDS is coming from the monkeys-gorillas?

Here, this only a small peace of information that I have try to translate from the article I have in my PC:

Recently, a number of Americans were surprised by the spread of flammable videos, the rumors among them Dzhermeja Rev. Wright. Viewers listened to the priest who spoke about the US government created AIDS as a kind of genocide attack against the black population. soon, as usual, the media has condemned such a statement against the US government as a kind of "conspiracy theory". But is it really so ...?

Dzhermeja Wright in a period of his life he was the spiritual adviser to the current US president, Barack Obama. That in 1961, in the twenties of his life he interrupted college studies and then joined the Marines. After completion of the second year, reported the navies. There, soon became a cardiovascular technician. Later he became one of the managers in the medical team for the care of President Lyndon Johnson after his operation in 1966.

For his services to the team when he left in 1966, the White House awarded him three letters of praise. After leaving the service, Wright finished his last year of college and then became a monk and eventually became a pastor of a church.

For over two decades, more broadly written about "AIDS as an artificial creation and skillfully veiled genocidal program."

AIDS occurred in America in 1978, when scientists from the US government began to experimenting young, mostly white and healthy males from the gay population. They were chosen at the center of Manhattan, as part of experimental trials of vaccines against hepatitis B, which continued to spread in several cities until 1981, when an official epidemic occurred.
The foundations of the experiment disappeared in 1973, when The health project for gay men in Manhattan, has taken blood samples to test whether they are positive for hepatitis B in "New York City blood center".

The results were staggering. One out of every two samples were positive. In contrast, only 5% of the samples in "straight" men were positive.

The development of the Institute for therapeutic research "Merk" in West Point, Pennsylvania, the first crude experimental vaccine was tested on chimpanzees. The only animals susceptible to human blood, hepatitis B. Later, the vaccine was tested on a small group of retarded children.

Sry if you find some mistakes, but I try to translate the article from Macedonia to English. If you like the full article, feel free to tell me...

[Dick Trump]

There are some deep insights here.

[PrikiNo.1]

There are some deep insights here.

Here is the end of the article where we can find the logic questions about AIDS:

According to the latest statistics published on the Internet, about 20 million people worldwide died of AIDS, and 40 million are infected with the same disease. Most of them come from Africa. You do not need a lot to think about to realize that HIV has the most gay male population, and is transmitted through contaminated vaccines as part of hepatitis experiment. There are millions of white people in Africa.

1. If HIV was present for decades, why some scientists argue, that AIDS is primarily a disease of blacks, not the white man in Africa?
2. Why is AIDS in the US is first discovered among white gay men, but not among blacks?
3. Why the first cases of HIV were not observed among Americans of Asian origin or the Indians?
4. Why were not observed cases among women?
5. Why were also cases in the elderly, in people with chronic diseases?
6. Why did not exist "incubation period" for HIV in the United States?

The introduction of the HIV virus by hepatitis B was a deliberate attempt to liquidate the gay community, and to blame gay men for the spread of the disease in the general population because of their depravity and lifestyle of high risk.

The public is carefully hypnotized by the media, that only blacks, gays and afrikaskite green monkeys are responsible for causing AIDS. These politically "correct" scientifically "correct facts" are accepted by a large number of people, no questions asked.

Another CoIV people should die of HIV, in front of people to speak out against this genocide secret and obvious connection with eksprimentalnite vaccines and the introduction of a deadly virus in the "selective" population..?

So, what do you think now about the AIDS?

[Dick Trump]

There are some deep insights here.

Here is the end of the article where we can find the logic questions about AIDS:

According to the latest statistics published on the Internet, about 20 million people worldwide died of AIDS, and 40 million are infected with the same disease. Most of them come from Africa. You do not need a lot to think about to realize that HIV has the most gay male population, and is transmitted through contaminated vaccines as part of hepatitis experiment. There are millions of white people in Africa.

1. If HIV was present for decades, why some scientists argue, that AIDS is primarily a disease of blacks, not the white man in Africa?
2. Why is AIDS in the US is first discovered among white gay men, but not among blacks?
3. Why the first cases of HIV were not observed among Americans of Asian origin or the Indians?
4. Why were not observed cases among women?
5. Why were also cases in the elderly, in people with chronic diseases?
6. Why did not exist "incubation period" for HIV in the United States?

The introduction of the HIV virus by hepatitis B was a deliberate attempt to liquidate the gay community, and to blame gay men for the spread of the disease in the general population because of their depravity and lifestyle of high risk.

The public is carefully hypnotized by the media, that only blacks, gays and afrikaskite green monkeys are responsible for causing AIDS. These politically "correct" scientifically "correct facts" are accepted by a large number of people, no questions asked.

Another CoIV people should die of HIV, in front of people to speak out against this genocide secret and obvious connection with eksprimentalnite vaccines and the introduction of a deadly virus in the "selective" population..?

So, what do you think now about the AIDS?

I have personally never met anyone who had AIDS that didn't deserve it.

[ridery99]

Nonsense

Please stop lying and creating conspiracy theories.
HIV is caused by homosexual lifestyle.

[runpaint]

1. If HIV was present for decades, why some scientists argue, that AIDS is primarily a disease of blacks, not the white man in Africa?

It's not a matter of opinion, or something for scientists to argue.  If more black people in Africa have AIDS, it's probably because the majority of the African population is black.

But one major problem with the AIDS statistics for Africa is that they weren't doing AIDS tests.  They just wrote down "AIDS" for anyone with a runny nose or the flu, and then reported that 1 in 4 Africans has AIDS.  It's not true.

So the good news is that AIDS isn't being used to exterminate Africans.  Because Africans don't have as much AIDS as we've been told.

2. Why is AIDS in the US is first discovered among white gay men, but not among blacks?

I've read that AIDS was originally called GRID, Gay-Related Immune Disease.  It was first associated with the openly-gay culture in places with significant groups of openly gay men, such as New York.  The majority of openly gay men at the time were white, probably in part because white people were the majority population in the U.S.

I think you are also aware that the majority of black men in the U.S. who have sexual relations with other men do not openly admit it.  So when medical researchers first went to the gay communities to find out about AIDS, they found a disproportionate number of white gays.

3. Why the first cases of HIV were not observed among Americans of Asian origin or the Indians?

Before AIDS was discovered by doctors and scientists, people were dying from it and the cause of death would be listed as pneumonia or another illness.  Doctors didn't notice 50% of all Asian patients coming in with pneumonia, or 50% of all their Indian patients coming in with pneumonia.  If they had, they would have searched for some reason within the Asian or Indian communities which could have been causing it.  But it was gays that were noticed to have a new illness among their group, so they investigated gay people.  There were probably other people who had AIDS, but they weren't openly gay, so those people continued to die "of pneumonia" because there was nothing else to identify their illness as AIDS until the virus was isolated.

4. Why were not observed cases among women?

There was no blood test for AIDS.  It was, and still is, a primarily gay disease.  Lesbians do not typically transmit AIDS to each other, and women typically do not transmit AIDS to men.  Because when a man has sex with a woman, her blood or bodily fluid usually does not get into the man's bloodstream.

So if a woman gets AIDS, she will probably die without passing it on to anyone else.  But when a gay man gets AIDS, he is more likely to pass it on to multiple other gay men, and each of them are very likely to pass it on to others.  That's why it spread among gays instead of among straight people.

Most women who get AIDS were infected by bisexual men.  Transmission is more likely with anal sex, because there is damage and bleeding which allows the semen into the bloodstream.

There are places in Africa where "dry sex" is considered the cultural norm among some groups, and women will put herbs or toothpaste into their vaginas to dry themselves out.  Then the sex has more friction, but also results in more tearing of the vaginal tissue and a greater chance of AIDS transmission.  

5. Why were also cases in the elderly, in people with chronic diseases?

Some of those cases certainly involved AIDS-infected blood transfusions.

6. Why did not exist "incubation period" for HIV in the United States?

I don't know what you mean, but there are at least 3 major strains of HIV.  One is more prevalent in the U.S., one is more prevalent in Africa, and one is more prevalent in Asia.  There is nothing unusual about that.  

The introduction of the HIV virus by hepatitis B was a deliberate attempt to liquidate the gay community, and to blame gay men for the spread of the disease in the general population because of their depravity and lifestyle of high risk.

No one has forced gay men to infect each other with AIDS.  They have known about AIDS for 30 years, and it's still being transmitted to new patients every day.  

No one has forced straight people to act differently to prevent themselves from getting AIDS.  If straight people acted like gay people, they would have just as much AIDS.  But it would spread more slowly, since men give it to women more than women give it to men.

Is it 100 times more likely for a gay person to get AIDS?  Or is it more than that?

It's not a conspiracy, it's just physics.  A torn anus lets the AIDS virus into the bloodstream more easily than a penis, and the vagina doesn't let it in easily unless the vagina is torn.  

And then the average gay person has over 10 times more sexual partners than the average straight person, compounding their already-increased risk.

How is the government responsible for that?  

[Balthazar]

1. If HIV was present for decades, why some scientists argue, that AIDS is primarily a disease of blacks, not the white man in Africa?

It's not a matter of opinion, or something for scientists to argue.  If more black people in Africa have AIDS, it's probably because the majority of the African population is black.

Not necessary.

1) There were several waves of plague in europe.
2) Most of HIV strains are CCR5-tropic strains.

CCR5-D32 mutation increased the probability of survival for those who had this mutation. As the result of natural selection, share of CCR5-D32 in european gene pool has been increased. The same is correct for other "good" mutations, there are many varians of CCR5 gene.

Fortunately for europeans, these mutations are also making it more difficult for HIV to merge with cell. For example, if you have one copy of CCR5-D32 gene then HIV infection is developing much slower than with regular genome, and it can take ~20-30 years to show any symptoms of immunodeficiency. If you're lucky to have two copies of D32 variation of gene (~1% of white population), then you're nearly 100% resistant to infection by CCR5-tropic strains of HIV.

Nothing like these european epidemies of plague happened in Africa or America. As the result, gene pool of native population wasn't affected by natural selection, leaving them more vulnerable to CCR5-tropic strains of HIV.

No mystics, pure science.

[runpaint]

Back to the topic:  multiple studies have found that gay men "have their first sexual experience" much younger than the average straight person.  And gays are more likely to have that first experience with an older partner.  

So if a boy is 9 years old, or 11 years old, and is anally penetrated by a 13-year-old, or a 15-year-old, or a 50-year-old, they are calling that a beautiful first love experience.  But of course it has nothing to do with love.



The truth is that being gay is similar to being fat.  There can be many contributing factors.  It's not healthy, it's disgusting to most people (even themselves), and most people agree that "nobody would choose to be that way".  Most fat people didn't decide to be fat, but they still choose the behaviors and habits every day that keep them fat.  

They feel that it's impossible for them to change their behaviors, because they have mental and emotional dysfunctions.

They use a biological function - eating (or sex) - as an emotional coping mechanism, which involves them abusing the natural biological function of their bodies.  

So yes, "if they just stopped eating so much, they would stop being fat."  Just like "if they stopped having gay sex, they would stop being gay."  But unless they learn healthy coping mechanisms, they would remain dysfunctional.

Of course, being fat doesn't strictly prevent people from reproducing within a monogamous relationship.  Being gay does prevent people from reproducing within a monogamous relationship, making a normal marriage and family impossible;  it's like being infertile.  But being fat does go a long way toward the same result, for many people.  

Like gay people, fat people don't want to follow the rules that everyone else follows.  They free themselves from certain responsibilities and step outside social norms.  Like most freedoms, this freedom from the burden of social duty is not often relinquished willingly.  Being fat isn't "just like being skinny, but fatter."  It usually means you don't care about being neat, clean, organized, and an entire list of things that go with it.  Fat people often give up on fitting in, and that has an effect on every area of their mentality.  They are outsiders, apart from mainstream society, and unwilling to take any steps towards joining.  



So that's how I see it, and now people will disagree using emotion instead of logic.  

If you want to show that I'm wrong, all you have to do is simply come up with some thoughts about homosexuality that don't apply to obesity:



"I've known him since he was 5 years old, and I could already tell he would be fat."

"He was born fat because he says so."

"Even as a child, he loved his mother's sausages and would eat 3 pounds a day.  Of course she encouraged him because she knew he was born fat and she loves him for who he is."

"The only reason fat people aren't happy is because you won't accept them."

"Being fat is an orientation.  Even if you lose weight, you're still fat in your mind if you were born fat."

"It's not about how much you actually eat and exercise.  It's about how much you prefer to eat and exercise.  That's why being fat can never be defined scientifically, or proven by studying someone.  It's only based on what people say about their own thoughts."

"He pretended to be skinny for a long time, but he finally admitted that he was born fat.  Then he got skinny again, so it turns out he wasn't born fat."

"If you don't like fat people, you're secretly fat yourself."

"Being fat isn't a choice.  Can't you see how different their bodies are?  That proves it's genetic."

"If being morbidly obese makes them happy, who are you to tell your children it's undesirable?"

"There's nothing wrong with weighing so much you can't get out of bed.  Only backwards inbred racist religious fools disagree."

"When they shove so much food down their orifice that it makes them puke, that is love.  It's just as noble and beautiful as your grandparents starting a family and being together every day for 60 years."

[UliJonHoth]

I don't think the average person that adds a rainbow filter to their facebook profile has any idea what kind of things these people do behind closed doors or in the company of other homosexuals. A close family member was part owner of a hair salon when I was growing up and had many gay friends, after years of being around them she sold her part in the business. The stories of what she witnessed at parties or was told in confidence by her friends over the years was mind-blowing, beyond warped...and from what she said, most of these people would tell her they weren't happy being gay and wished they were straight. I really could care less what people do behind closed doors and the whole lgbt population is in reality very small, but now that there is this push to "normalize" it and spread it to the masses - especially children - that pisses me off.

[runpaint]

I don't think the average person that adds a rainbow filter to their facebook profile has any idea what kind of things these people do behind closed doors or in the company of other homosexuals. A close family member was part owner of a hair salon when I was growing up and had many gay friends, after years of being around them she sold her part in the business. The stories of what she witnessed at parties or was told in confidence by her friends over the years was mind-blowing, beyond warped...and from what she said, most of these people would tell her they weren't happy being gay and wished they were straight. I really could care less what people do behind closed doors and the whole lgbt population is in reality very small, but now that there is this push to "normalize" it and spread it to the masses - especially children - that pisses me off.

I've heard a lot of similar stories. 

How many adult gay men still live with their mothers?  How many of them sleep in the same bed with their mothers?

The answers you get will be different from people who actually know a lot of gay men. 

In our age of single mothers, women are used to being abandoned.  But there is sometimes one man she can depend on never to leave her - her son, as long as he doesn't meet a woman and get married. 

A lot of gay men couldn't be with a woman because they would feel like they were cheating on their own mom.



A famous example would be Anderson Cooper talking about which of his mom's boyfriends was better at licking his mother's vagina.

Another famous example would be Walt Whitman, whose poetry seems to draw a close connection between his mother and masturbation.

Another famous example would be Alexander McQueen, the fashion designer who killed himself the day before his mother's funeral.

Another famous example would be Barney Bubbles, the fashion designer who killed himself on his late mother's wedding anniversary.


For anyone who wasn't aware, there is plenty of reading.  Sometimes they admit that there is a positive correlation between a man being gay and having an unusually close relationship with his mother, but sometimes they pretend the causality is the other way around. 

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/gay-and-lesbian-well-being/201108/gay-men-and-their-mothers-is-there-special-closeness

"My research, clinical and personal experiences suggest that there is indeed a causal link between male homosexuality and a close maternal relationship..."

http://www.johncalendo.com/gallery/gay-sons-their-mothers/gay-sons-their-mothers/

Your mother, you freely admit, is a vain and beautiful woman — but then you’re not exactly mirror-shy yourself. You have been trained from birth to be her personal fashion consultant, and now it is she who parades up and down the boulevard on your arm — each of you the other’s favorite bauble.

http://www.johncalendo.com/gallery/gay-sons-their-mothers/gay-sons-their-mothers-4/

In your mid-teens, a gloominess came over you that only sex with strangers could dispel. By then, everyone was making allowances for what they called your “artistic temperament.”

Now, decades later, some observers think your absent mother took no part in shaping the man you have become. You know otherwise.

http://www.johncalendo.com/gallery/gay-sons-their-mothers/gay-sons-their-mothers-4/

You urged her to divorce the old man, to flee with you to some bohemian walk-up far away. Your mother played with this idea for a while, but only as a new way to talk about your father.

Too late you learned that while you wanted a soulmate, she only wanted a girlfriend.

http://fathersforlife.org/dale/childhood_of_homosexual_men_3.htm

The case histories presented by Bieber reveal psychologically destructive mother/son relationships. In one case the mother kept her son in bed most of the time between age four and seven because of a minor intestinal condition. Her daily ritual was to rub her son's back, pat and kiss his buttocks. The boy became terrified when he reacted to this inappropriate behavior by becoming visibly sexually aroused.

http://www.samesame.com.au/forum/showthread.php?t=21524

I challenged a friend as to why at the age of 40 he still lived with his mother. At first he was surprised that I had made this observation of what he thought was a perfectly normal living situation. He then analysed his other gay friends and even his gay relatives and he too discovered the theme that many of them lived with their mothers. Thus began a very difficult journey for him. He discovered the destructive co-dependant nature of his relationship he had with his mother.

...


To all those gay (and often single) men out their in their 30s, 40s, 50 who live with their mother – its time to get some balance in your life. If you live apart from your mother but continually obsess about her, speak to her every day for hours on the phone and constantly worry about her then perhaps you need to think about your situation more carefully.

The unhealthy, unbalanced relationships that some gay men have with their mothers should be squarely looked at by the gay community. I am not sure what is the causes of this syndrome, that it the job for psychologist to answer, but I have had enough of it. We have to start talking about it this global phenomenon.

Our obsession with women continues into our careers as well. Hairdressers, make up artists, dress and shoe designers, shop assistants, stylists, wedding planners, jewellery designers all devote themselves to worshiping the image of the ideal woman – their perfect mother.

Mothers – keep a healthy distance from your gay sons – we are not incestuous substitutes for your often-failed relationships with heterosexual men.

[Losvienleg]

Interesting theory. I dont think i have any gay friends (in my country they are still mostly hiding as they should) to ask them, but i guess OP could be somewhat right. In my opinion, molesting could be one of reasons but not only one. Some ppl simply are genetically screwed and some become gay from other reasons. I guess, most of them could be treated and cured if their genes are not to messed up.

There is no cure. That's why they're hiding. They are terrified of you finding out the truth. They should be.

That's not true. Homosexuality is just a mental desease, no different from schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, it can be treated and even cured. There are many experimental practices with significant history of success since the beginning of 20th century. Unfortunately, nobody is interested in providing the treatment services to these people... And even worse, they're proseciting scientists for any publications on that subject. Majority of establishment prefer to ignore this problem, pretending that it's just a variation of norm. I wonder why they aren't pretending that schizophrenia is a variation of norm.

Everybody should be provided with sufficient medical assistance. At least, some information about this disease should be made available to the general public. It's currently available only in the scientific research papers, but not everybody is able to understand scientific narrative. I think it's obvious that current situation is nothing but a blatant violation of fundamental human rights.

This is true. I think you should ask to some socialists how they see that, this should make you laugh, and then you'll understand why they keep it secret. That's because on their Holy Human Rights, that's stated that no one can be discriminated. Also, when a huge proportion of people in medias are gay, that doesn't help .

[PrikiNo.1]

1. If HIV was present for decades, why some scientists argue, that AIDS is primarily a disease of blacks, not the white man in Africa?

It's not a matter of opinion, or something for scientists to argue.  If more black people in Africa have AIDS, it's probably because the majority of the African population is black.

But one major problem with the AIDS statistics for Africa is that they weren't doing AIDS tests.  They just wrote down "AIDS" for anyone with a runny nose or the flu, and then reported that 1 in 4 Africans has AIDS.  It's not true.

So the good news is that AIDS isn't being used to exterminate Africans.  Because Africans don't have as much AIDS as we've been told.

2. Why is AIDS in the US is first discovered among white gay men, but not among blacks?

I've read that AIDS was originally called GRID, Gay-Related Immune Disease.  It was first associated with the openly-gay culture in places with significant groups of openly gay men, such as New York.  The majority of openly gay men at the time were white, probably in part because white people were the majority population in the U.S.

I think you are also aware that the majority of black men in the U.S. who have sexual relations with other men do not openly admit it.  So when medical researchers first went to the gay communities to find out about AIDS, they found a disproportionate number of white gays.

3. Why the first cases of HIV were not observed among Americans of Asian origin or the Indians?

Before AIDS was discovered by doctors and scientists, people were dying from it and the cause of death would be listed as pneumonia or another illness.  Doctors didn't notice 50% of all Asian patients coming in with pneumonia, or 50% of all their Indian patients coming in with pneumonia.  If they had, they would have searched for some reason within the Asian or Indian communities which could have been causing it.  But it was gays that were noticed to have a new illness among their group, so they investigated gay people.  There were probably other people who had AIDS, but they weren't openly gay, so those people continued to die "of pneumonia" because there was nothing else to identify their illness as AIDS until the virus was isolated.

4. Why were not observed cases among women?

There was no blood test for AIDS.  It was, and still is, a primarily gay disease.  Lesbians do not typically transmit AIDS to each other, and women typically do not transmit AIDS to men.  Because when a man has sex with a woman, her blood or bodily fluid usually does not get into the man's bloodstream.

So if a woman gets AIDS, she will probably die without passing it on to anyone else.  But when a gay man gets AIDS, he is more likely to pass it on to multiple other gay men, and each of them are very likely to pass it on to others.  That's why it spread among gays instead of among straight people.

Most women who get AIDS were infected by bisexual men.  Transmission is more likely with anal sex, because there is damage and bleeding which allows the semen into the bloodstream.

There are places in Africa where "dry sex" is considered the cultural norm among some groups, and women will put herbs or toothpaste into their vaginas to dry themselves out.  Then the sex has more friction, but also results in more tearing of the vaginal tissue and a greater chance of AIDS transmission.  

5. Why were also cases in the elderly, in people with chronic diseases?

Some of those cases certainly involved AIDS-infected blood transfusions.

6. Why did not exist "incubation period" for HIV in the United States?

I don't know what you mean, but there are at least 3 major strains of HIV.  One is more prevalent in the U.S., one is more prevalent in Africa, and one is more prevalent in Asia.  There is nothing unusual about that.  

The introduction of the HIV virus by hepatitis B was a deliberate attempt to liquidate the gay community, and to blame gay men for the spread of the disease in the general population because of their depravity and lifestyle of high risk.

No one has forced gay men to infect each other with AIDS.  They have known about AIDS for 30 years, and it's still being transmitted to new patients every day.  

No one has forced straight people to act differently to prevent themselves from getting AIDS.  If straight people acted like gay people, they would have just as much AIDS.  But it would spread more slowly, since men give it to women more than women give it to men.

Is it 100 times more likely for a gay person to get AIDS?  Or is it more than that?

It's not a conspiracy, it's just physics.  A torn anus lets the AIDS virus into the bloodstream more easily than a penis, and the vagina doesn't let it in easily unless the vagina is torn.  

And then the average gay person has over 10 times more sexual partners than the average straight person, compounding their already-increased risk.

How is the government responsible for that?  

If HIV was present for decades, why some scientists argue, that AIDS is primarily a disease of blacks, not the white man in Africa?

It is very obviously that the first patients of AIDS where the black males in Africa, because it's logically that this race is the poorest in the whole world and the Government succeed to find a deadly biological weapon who will destroy them slowly.

Why is AIDS in the US is first discovered among white gay men, but not among blacks?

First they created the GMO and put in the food and know they killing their product. GMO is responsible from mixing the hormones in the human body, that's why we have some many gays and lesbians today!

Why the first cases of HIV were not observed among Americans of Asian origin or the Indians?

Because, there are 7 billions on this planet and we don't have enough resources for this number, so that's why it is time to start for destroying the poorest population.

Why were not observed cases among women?

You already give the answer of this question.

Why were also cases in the elderly, in people with chronic diseases?

I am not expert about this question... Sry.

Why did not exist "incubation period" for HIV in the United States?

That is a very interesting question... Why?

[adibe]

i think its 50% by molester an 50% by himself

[PrikiNo.1]

1. If HIV was present for decades, why some scientists argue, that AIDS is primarily a disease of blacks, not the white man in Africa?

It's not a matter of opinion, or something for scientists to argue.  If more black people in Africa have AIDS, it's probably because the majority of the African population is black.

Not necessary.

1) There were several waves of plague in europe.
2) Most of HIV strains are CCR5-tropic strains.

CCR5-D32 mutation increased the probability of survival for those who had this mutation. As the result of natural selection, share of CCR5-D32 in european gene pool has been increased. The same is correct for other "good" mutations, there are many varians of CCR5 gene.

Fortunately for europeans, these mutations are also making it more difficult for HIV to merge with cell. For example, if you have one copy of CCR5-D32 gene then HIV infection is developing much slower than with regular genome, and it can take ~20-30 years to show any symptoms of immunodeficiency. If you're lucky to have two copies of D32 variation of gene (~1% of white population), then you're nearly 100% resistant to infection by CCR5-tropic strains of HIV.

Nothing like these european epidemies of plague happened in Africa or America. As the result, gene pool of native population wasn't affected by natural selection, leaving them more vulnerable to CCR5-tropic strains of HIV.

No mystics, pure science.

Sure, I respect you words, but let me ask you something: If we have virus is it logical that there is antivirus, right?

Here is the last study that I have read about AIDS:

Bees could hold the key to preventing HIV transmission. Researchers have discovered that bee venom kills the virus while leaving body cells unharmed, which could lead to an anti-HIV vaginal gel and other treatments.

Scientists at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis found that melittin, a toxin found in bee venom, physically destroys the HIV virus, a breakthrough that could potentially lead to drugs that are immune to HIV resistance. The study was published Thursday in the journal Antiviral Therapy.

"Our hope is that in places where HIV is running rampant, people could use this as a preventative measure to stop the initial infection," Joshua Hood, one of the authors of the study, said in a statement.

So tell me, if already have the anti-virus here on planet Earth, then is it normal they know how to develop the virus?

[zivone]

Homosexuality is not genetic. It is caused by being molested.

I can't agree with this. I have gay friends and they were not molested  and were obviously gay during our childhood days.

[runpaint]

Homosexuality is not genetic. It is caused by being molested.

I can't agree with this. I have gay friends and they were not molested  and were obviously gay during our childhood days.

If they were fat as children, does that mean they were born fat and that being fat is just as good as being fit?

[bryant.coleman]

No one has forced gay men to infect each other with AIDS.  They have known about AIDS for 30 years, and it's still being transmitted to new patients every day.  

There is even a phenomenon called bug-catching. Young gay males undergo recipient sex with gays who are HIV positive, in order to get themselves infected. Some of the mentally retarded homosexuals consider this the ultimate homo-erotic feeling. There are even websites and forums, which give a step-by-step instruction for younger homosexuals, in order to get themselves the HIV.

[PrikiNo.1]

Homosexuality is not genetic. It is caused by being molested.

I can't agree with this. I have gay friends and they were not molested  and were obviously gay during our childhood days.

Sry, but I think you wrong...

I was having a few experience with gays and also I used to have a gay friend. We was friends for a couple of years. I didn't noticed that, but I have heard rumors about him and honestly I didn't want to believe until one day... We was watching a movie and he lied on the bed near to me. In that moment I have realize that the rumors were true and I leave immediately!

After that I start to analyse the situation and have realize that the gay are actually confused persons. They are influenced by the TV, Internet and most of all the GMO in our daily products. I was arguing with one guy who study chemistry and even he admitted that GMO can cause some problems with our hormones. By the law of the nature we are born as a male and female, it is simple!