Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 04:43:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Ripple a Bitcoin Killer or Complementer? Founder of Mt Gox will launch Ripple  (Read 34063 times)
paulie_w
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 22, 2012, 10:45:24 AM
 #121

question about privacy on ripple:

you have a public ledger. okay, so is there something analogous to the receiving address quasi-anonymity feature in bitcoin? how about for sending addresses or "wallets", do i have as many of those as i want?

generally it would be interesting to have comments about how privacy works or doesn't in ripple.
lebing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000

Enabling the maximal migration


View Profile
December 22, 2012, 05:53:06 PM
 #122

Anyone else get into the latest beta?

Bro, do you even blockchain?
-E Voorhees
Meatpile
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 277
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 23, 2012, 12:33:08 AM
 #123

Oh the same Jed who let his computer get compromised and gave up his illegal highly immoral back door access to MTGOX, which in turn resulted in the first big mtgox hack?

What can go wrong!?
ElectricMucus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057


Marketing manager - GO MP


View Profile WWW
December 23, 2012, 12:35:36 AM
 #124

Oh the same Jed who let his computer get compromised and gave up his illegal back door access to MTGOX, which in turn resulted in the first big mtgox hack?

What can go wrong!?

QFT

Watch your back, the natives going to be restless.
HostFat
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4270
Merit: 1208


I support freedom of choice


View Profile WWW
December 23, 2012, 12:36:02 AM
 #125

Oh the same Jed who let his computer get compromised and gave up his illegal highly immoral back door access to MTGOX, which in turn resulted in the first big mtgox hack?

What can go wrong!?
On March 6th, 2011
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/MtGox#History

NON DO ASSISTENZA PRIVATA - http://hostfatmind.com
CharlieContent
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 23, 2012, 03:06:24 AM
 #126

On another note, what do you think of our logo?



Sorry I'm a bit late to the party on this thread but I couldn't walk without passing comment on this logo.

I apologize for my frankness, but it is truly disgusting. It is very, very poorly designed.

Here is why: The most jarring thing about it is the foul gradient. It's offensively cheesy. Gradients are not your friend.

The typography is nothing short of an abomination. The font was extremely poorly chosen. Just a ghastly font altogether, really. The kerning (the space in between the letters) is very uneven. It does not look good.

The little pictogram at the side is flawed. I'm not 100% against the idea or even the 3d perspective thing, but it is very poorly executed. The perspective effect is wrong. Look closely at it. It is broken.

Again we have ghastly gradients. Even worse this time than the text, and that is saying something. Also in my opinion you should stick with two colors. Using more than two colors in a logo is a tricky pro's move that the designer of this monstrosity has no business trying to attempt.

All the proportions are wrong. It is just totally out of proportion, in every sense. Everything it can get wrong, it does.

I feel like the whole thing was designed by someone with absolutely no design skill, talent or expertise. The person who created this wasn't a designer - he/she was a software operator. And not a very good one.

I'm guessing it cost maybe $10 max. If it cost more you got ripped off.



lebing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000

Enabling the maximal migration


View Profile
December 23, 2012, 04:23:21 AM
 #127

But, how do you really feel Charlie?

Bro, do you even blockchain?
-E Voorhees
Boussac
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1220
Merit: 1015


e-ducat.fr


View Profile WWW
December 23, 2012, 11:01:54 AM
 #128

On another note, what do you think of our logo?



Sorry I'm a bit late to the party on this thread but I couldn't walk without passing comment on this logo.

I apologize for my frankness, but it is truly disgusting. It is very, very poorly designed.

Here is why: The most jarring thing about it is the foul gradient. It's offensively cheesy. Gradients are not your friend.

The typography is nothing short of an abomination. The font was extremely poorly chosen. Just a ghastly font altogether, really. The kerning (the space in between the letters) is very uneven. It does not look good.

The little pictogram at the side is flawed. I'm not 100% against the idea or even the 3d perspective thing, but it is very poorly executed. The perspective effect is wrong. Look closely at it. It is broken.

Again we have ghastly gradients. Even worse this time than the text, and that is saying something. Also in my opinion you should stick with two colors. Using more than two colors in a logo is a tricky pro's move that the designer of this monstrosity has no business trying to attempt.

All the proportions are wrong. It is just totally out of proportion, in every sense. Everything it can get wrong, it does.

I feel like the whole thing was designed by someone with absolutely no design skill, talent or expertise. The person who created this wasn't a designer - he/she was a software operator. And not a very good one.

I'm guessing it cost maybe $10 max. If it cost more you got ripped off.

Thanks. I knew there was something wrong with this design but I could not tell what.

cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
December 23, 2012, 01:27:33 PM
 #129

Ripple is an idea that is both way too ahead of its time and obsolete simultaneously. It depends on trusting people to be honest about competing for limited resources. Ripple is like the old charge plates from the 1940s. It will work better when people are not competing for scarce capital.

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
bahatassafus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 04, 2013, 05:28:43 PM
 #130

Ripple is an idea that is both way too ahead of its time and obsolete simultaneously. It depends on trusting people to be honest about competing for limited resources. Ripple is like the old charge plates from the 1940s. It will work better when people are not competing for scarce capital.

well im not sure what this ripple reloaded will be like, but the original was about creating money where / when it's needed and by the two parties who need it. In this sense it is not the old competition over scarce capital as fiat and bitcoin are. 
Vladimir
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1001


-


View Profile
February 05, 2013, 02:29:35 AM
Last edit: February 05, 2013, 02:48:34 AM by Vladimir
 #131

I think many people when talking about extending trust completely miss one important point, specifically concept of money velocity and circulation. One does not really need to have a lot of trust obtained or extended to effectively transact in a ripple network. One would need, basically just one month or one week turnover worth of "well connected" trust, that can be easily bought using collateral such as bitcoins or gold, for example. Whether it is a week or a month or a year worth of trust depends mostly on ones income/expense cycle.

You do not need to drown the wheels of commerce in oil to make it work, just a few drops of the oil in the right place will do the trick.




-
evolve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500


daytrader/superhero


View Profile
February 05, 2013, 02:34:47 AM
 #132

I like the logo.  Huh
misterbigg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 05, 2013, 03:55:40 PM
 #133

1) Is this steaming turd still in beta?

2) Where the hell are the technical specifications and protocol descriptions?

JoelKatz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012


Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.


View Profile WWW
February 05, 2013, 07:19:01 PM
Last edit: February 06, 2013, 06:21:16 AM by JoelKatz
 #134

1) Is this steaming turd still in beta?

2) Where the hell are the technical specifications and protocol descriptions?
This is the worst food I've ever eaten and the portion sizes are way too small.

Or, if you prefer: This soup is awful. Can I have the recipe?

I am an employee of Ripple. Follow me on Twitter @JoelKatz
1Joe1Katzci1rFcsr9HH7SLuHVnDy2aihZ BM-NBM3FRExVJSJJamV9ccgyWvQfratUHgN
FlipPro
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015


View Profile
February 05, 2013, 11:11:26 PM
 #135

1) Is this steaming turd still in beta?

2) Where the hell are the technical specifications and protocol descriptions?



Cavemen were afraid of fire too ya know Wink.

It's how people react in the face of life-changing innovations.
Rassah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1035



View Profile WWW
February 06, 2013, 06:54:14 PM
 #136

Cavemen were afraid of fire too ya know Wink.

It's how people react in the face of life-changing innovations.

I wish it was. I think there are a few ENORMOUS barriers to it becoming mainstream, and doubt it will  ever become a "life-changing innovation." Please prove people like me wrong.
misterbigg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 06, 2013, 09:12:27 PM
 #137

Cavemen were afraid of fire too ya know Wink.

Unlike Bitcoin, which had Satoshi's wonderful and inspiring paper to read - the available literature for Ripple is almost worthless.

I accessed the beta wiki and read every word of what was published, and there is practically no concrete information. Certainly not enough information to make a piece of software that can interoperate with the existing beta nodes.

Almost everywhere in the sparse Ripple technical docs, important details are glossed over with no description given to algorithms or procedures.

This is garbage.
JoelKatz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012


Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.


View Profile WWW
February 06, 2013, 10:27:09 PM
 #138

Unlike Bitcoin, which had Satoshi's wonderful and inspiring paper to read - the available literature for Ripple is almost worthless.

I accessed the beta wiki and read every word of what was published, and there is practically no concrete information. Certainly not enough information to make a piece of software that can interoperate with the existing beta nodes.

Almost everywhere in the sparse Ripple technical docs, important details are glossed over with no description given to algorithms or procedures.

This is garbage.
I'm not saying that documentation isn't important, but this seems just a bit excessive.

I am an employee of Ripple. Follow me on Twitter @JoelKatz
1Joe1Katzci1rFcsr9HH7SLuHVnDy2aihZ BM-NBM3FRExVJSJJamV9ccgyWvQfratUHgN
HostFat
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4270
Merit: 1208


I support freedom of choice


View Profile WWW
February 07, 2013, 07:19:24 AM
 #139

Password isn't asked anymore, but it is still in beta.

NON DO ASSISTENZA PRIVATA - http://hostfatmind.com
alexkravets
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
February 07, 2013, 10:20:07 AM
 #140

Unlike Bitcoin, which had Satoshi's wonderful and inspiring paper to read - the available literature for Ripple is almost worthless.

I accessed the beta wiki and read every word of what was published, and there is practically no concrete information. Certainly not enough information to make a piece of software that can interoperate with the existing beta nodes.

Almost everywhere in the sparse Ripple technical docs, important details are glossed over with no description given to algorithms or procedures.

This is garbage.
I'm not saying that documentation isn't important, but this seems just a bit excessive.


Ripple does seem to have lots of good ideas embedded in it, therefore it's not garbage, but the problem is that Ripple's documentation ( at least so far ) doesn't seem to be converging into anything that any programmer wanting to implement an interoperable implementation would call a spec. Such a convergence might eventually be achieved, however in the meantime, the lack of ( even informal ) spec creates suspicion that the system may ultimately be unsound.

Cheers

P.S. I am personally routing for Ripple to become the "credit coin" to Bitcoin's "permanent coin"

Alex Kravets         http://twitter.com/alexkravets
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!