Bitcoin Forum
June 05, 2026, 04:18:33 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 [674]
  Print  
Author Topic: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it  (Read 390915 times)
8_2bp
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 04, 2026, 09:18:08 PM
 #13461

@abhi9100

Thank you for asking in good faith. You are one of the very few
users on this thread today who asked a question instead of
attacking me.

I would like to give you a full answer about my research, but I
cannot do it on this thread tonight. Four of my posts have been
deleted today by moderation, all citing "off-topic" - including
ones that were directly about the puzzle. If I respond to your
question here in detail, that response will likely also disappear.

What I can say briefly: I do not believe the construction is
70/30 random/pattern. My analysis points to something more
specific, with statistical signatures that can be tested
independently. Your intuition about non-random construction
aligns with mine, but the mechanism is different than
compounding. The detailed reasoning is in my book, which is in
progress.

For anyone who genuinely wants to discuss this, my email is
8_2bp@proton.me and PM here is open. Anonymous channels with
trackers, like the ones I have received today, do not interest
me. Direct, identified communication does.

Save this reply if you want to keep it. Based on today's
pattern, it may not stay here long.

Goodnight to the thread.

8_2bp
PHA_.07
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 07:29:55 AM
 #13462

I managed to lower the complexity of #135 from 67.5 to 57.5 bits. I've already tested my method and it works perfectly. Now I'm waiting on vast.ia; I hope I get lucky or succeed as soon as possible.

Be careful with any of the Ai right now, they can not keep the zeros consistent and have you on another range, you will be mislead and waste time.
PHA_.07
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
Today at 07:41:24 AM
 #13463

@abhi9100

Thank you for asking in good faith. You are one of the very few
users on this thread today who asked a question instead of
attacking me.

I would like to give you a full answer about my research, but I
cannot do it on this thread tonight. Four of my posts have been
deleted today by moderation, all citing "off-topic" - including
ones that were directly about the puzzle. If I respond to your
question here in detail, that response will likely also disappear.

What I can say briefly: I do not believe the construction is
70/30 random/pattern. My analysis points to something more
specific, with statistical signatures that can be tested
independently. Your intuition about non-random construction
aligns with mine, but the mechanism is different than
compounding. The detailed reasoning is in my book, which is in
progress.

For anyone who genuinely wants to discuss this, my email is
8_2bp@proton.me and PM here is open. Anonymous channels with
trackers, like the ones I have received today, do not interest
me. Direct, identified communication does.

Save this reply if you want to keep it. Based on today's
pattern, it may not stay here long.

Goodnight to the thread.

8_2bp

You do not have your newbie pm option open for people to pm you.
Pages: « 1 ... 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 [674]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!