Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[fecell]

That is, there would be no discrete logarithm problem.

of'coz.
ECDLP and div(G, d) different casuality.

[eggsylacer]

@eggsylacer as i was saying to others, are you a PHD, double PHD or nobel prize winner?
That's the problem, here o forum who is arguing have no ideea about the crypto domain...you follow like sheeps the software built of others, use AI and you think that all the things AI is giving you is perfect...
30 years ago you had no chance to go in a domain similar to this one, and now using AI in 2-3 minutes you think you are GOD...
If anyone is smart enough, built your own algorithm, own softwares and don't give advices to others if you cannot prove your real world identity or what study, academic or Nobel Prize....
Give it a break...this forum is letting anyone who can use AI thinking and comporting like Einstein....
If you cannot prove that, or invest  at least 1.000.000Euro in research, you are just a child with a laptop that use AI and think he is a hacker....
Also using multiple accounts from fake email addresses....

This is reality...

That's right, people like you, after reading the answers of neural networks, believe that you have acquired intimate knowledge in areas where, at least, there is no information in the public domain. As proof, the person above dropped a link to the neural network's response and at the same time does not even understand what is written there... This is how it used to be: people cited Google answers as proof and said that this was an unassailable truth. And now it’s the same thing, only with AI.
If you think that asking at AI "how to hack bitcoin" will give you the answer, then I have bad news for you.

That is, there would be no discrete logarithm problem.

of'coz.
ECDLP and div(G, d) different casuality.

What about not using AI to communicate with other people? Otherwise, why do I need you as a barrier between me and the AI?? As already understood above, you don’t understand what you’re talking about.

[fecell]

That is, there would be no discrete logarithm problem.

of'coz.
ECDLP and div(G, d) different casuality.

What about not using AI to communicate with other people? Otherwise, what do you need for, as a the strip between me and the AI? As already understood above, you don’t understand what you’re talking about.

Code:

C:\2>solver_kav0m_v6-3.exe 145
[+] Loaded puzzle 145 from key_list.py
[!] Memory budget clamps table M: 500000000 -> 246771126 (pinned in auto_m6_P145.txt)
total bits: 145
range bits: 124
table scalars M:  246,771,126
base threads:     2097152
probes to scan:   5,248,241,427,689,071,100,347,925,727,234,088,107,000,201,216
expected probes:  7.681e+34


[+] Resuming search from saved counter: 7,121
[!] Initializing GPU secp256k1...
Initializing secp256k1 for GPU...
secp256k1 constants initialized on GPU
Initializing precomputed table for base point G...
Table size: 256 entries (0.02 MB)
Precomputed table initialized successfully in global memory
secp256k1 GPU initialization complete!

=== GPU Device Information ===
Device Name:                NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
Compute Capability:         7.5
CUDA Driver Version:        13.3
CUDA Runtime Version:       13.3
Total Global Memory:        4.00 GB
Shared Memory per Block:    48.00 KB
Max Threads per Block:      1024
Max Block Dimensions:       1024 x 1024 x 64
Max Grid Dimensions:        2147483647 x 65535 x 65535
Warp Size:                  32
Number of Multiprocessors:  16
Memory Bus Width:           128 bits
Free Memory at startup:     3.21 GB
Total Memory (system view): 4.00 GB
===============================

[!] Allocating GPU memory...
[+] Loading table cache: chk6_P145_step246771126.dat
[!] Building sorted index (CUB radix sort on GPU)...
[+] index built in 8.7 s (246771126 entries)
[+] Loading bloom filter: blm6_P145_step246771126.dat
[+] Tables built: 246771126 entries (3.03 GB keys+idx+bloom). Free VRAM: 0.18 GB
[19:11:18] [+] [3,824,131,506,176 / 22,300,745,198,530,623,141,535,718,272,648,361,505,980,416] S: 108604118.3 pr/s, E: 09:46:51, ETA: 2.241e+19 y, progress: 0.0000%
[19:11:27] [+] [3,825,205,248,000 / 22,300,745,198,530,623,141,535,718,272,648,361,505,980,416] S: 108606131.1 pr/s, E: 09:47:00, ETA: 2.241e+19 y, progress: 0.0000%

forgot AI. its just a 108606131.1 probes/s at low video card.


and its not over....speeeedup are waiting.

[puzzle_72_worker]

There is a sentence in my country: Don't put your mind and nervs with ....because he will beat you because he do not have the mind tired....
Your username is telling everything about the personality.
sorry but you are are lost cause...continue like this because we need this kind of people to live better

[analyticnomad]

There is a sentence in my country: Don't put your mind and nervs with ....because he will beat you because he do not have the mind tired....

That sentence makes me feel weird.

[detechs]

@eggsylacer as i was saying to others, are you a PHD, double PHD or nobel prize winner?
That's the problem, here o forum who is arguing have no ideea about the crypto domain...you follow like sheeps the software built of others, use AI and you think that all the things AI is giving you is perfect...
30 years ago you had no chance to go in a domain similar to this one, and now using AI in 2-3 minutes you think you are GOD...
If anyone is smart enough, built your own algorithm, own softwares and don't give advices to others if you cannot prove your real world identity or what study, academic or Nobel Prize....
Give it a break...this forum is letting anyone who can use AI thinking and comporting like Einstein....
If you cannot prove that, or invest  at least 1.000.000Euro in research, you are just a child with a laptop that use AI and think he is a hacker....
Also using multiple accounts from fake email addresses....

This is reality...

no phd, no prize, so i will not pretend to either. credentials do not do arithmetic, the machine does, and the machine is open for anyone to run.

you asked what qualifies someone to give advice. here is mine. i build my tools myself, from nothing, no libraries. every number in this page is held as an exact fraction, no floats, so the arithmetic cannot drift the way conventional code drifts. 0.1 + 0.2 is not 0.30000000000000004 here. when a decimal repeats, the page tells you the repeat instead of hiding it, and the whole calculation can be walked backwards and forwards step by step, because nothing is erased.

conventional maths throws the tail away and spends its life correcting the damage. this keeps the tail in a ledger and closes to zero. that is the comparison, tested with controls that refuse wrong data.

behind it a small physics engine runs, 13 spheres in the natural shell, waves, a firing threshold, three accounts that always balance. conservation holds to zero drift over 8000 frames, and the batteries that test all of this refuse to run if a planted control fails.

i am not claiming it finds keys faster, it does not (yet). i am saying every serious solver eventually comes back to arithmetic, and this is arithmetic that does not lie. that is how the science gets done, not with degrees.

just about to start up my own node to start listening in