Maxwell + Wiuelle = Hearn

[CIYAM]

What you are proposing is WORSE than the current Fiat System.

That's interesting - the guy didn't actually propose anything yet you stated that he did. What does that mean?

(it means that you are making up crap)

If you want to be taken seriously then why not accurately quote people rather than "put words into their mouths" to suit your own arguments?

No matter how much you guys are paid to shill it won't increase your IQ.

[keepdoing]

What you are proposing is WORSE than the current Fiat System.

That's interesting - the guy didn't actually propose anything yet you stated that he did. What does that mean?

(it means that you are making up crap)

If you want to be taken seriously then why not accurately quote people rather than "put words into their mouths" to suit your own arguments?

No matter how much you guys are paid to shill it won't increase your IQ.

I like it when you get so frustrated that you don't even make any sense 

And nobody pays me to shill.  I have my own agenda.... justice, equality, fair play, etc etc.  Not really complicated, but when you are blinded by your own special interests I can see how it could be.

[CIYAM]

And nobody pays me to shill.  I have my own agenda.... justice, equality, fair play, etc etc.  Not really complicated, but when you are blinded by your own special interests I can see how it could be.

For a start you couldn't frustrate me if you tried.

But assuming that I am frustrated then what exactly are my special interests (that seemingly you should know)?

[keepdoing]

And nobody pays me to shill.  I have my own agenda.... justice, equality, fair play, etc etc.  Not really complicated, but when you are blinded by your own special interests I can see how it could be.

For a start you couldn't frustrate me if you tried.

But assuming that I am frustrated then what exactly are my special interests (that seemingly you should know)?

Well, correct me if I am wrong, but isn't CIYAM in its own way a sidechain / offline solution?  If you limit onchain transaction capability - then by default your business model grows. 

Bigger blocks doesn't stop your business model, but keeping smaller blocks does strengthen your business model.  Conflict of interest in regards to central leadership decision making ability.

I wish you well with your business.  Looks interesting and promising.  I just wish you weren't taking a side to limit other business models.

[CIYAM]

Well, correct me if I am wrong, but isn't CIYAM in its own way a sidechain / offline solution?  If you limit onchain transaction capability - then by default your business model grows.  

CIYAM is not a sidechain at all (it is actually a software engineering platform that includes blockchain processing amongst many other things).

CIYAM can work with Bitcoin or with alts (or with no blockchain at all) - so it is not involved in any way about what changes may or may not happen to any of them.

If you want to have a meaningful debate then it would help if you educated yourself rather than spout off nonsense.

[keepdoing]

Well, correct me if I am wrong, but isn't CIYAM in its own way a sidechain / offline solution?  If you limit onchain transaction capability - then by default your business model grows.  

CIYAM is not a sidechain at all (it is actually a software engineering platform that includes blockchain processing amongst many other things).

CIYAM can work with Bitcoin or with alts (or with no blockchain at all) - so it is not involved about exactly what changes may or may not happen to any of them.

If you want to have a meaningful debate then it would help if you educated yourself rather than spout off nonsense.

I believe I covered the concept when I directly stated "offline solution".  

PS... as you stated earlier, you could just ignore me.  Feel free.

[CIYAM]

I believe I covered the concept when I directly stated "offline solution".  

You believe that spouting nonsense covers things?



(and yes I am going to ignore you)

[keepdoing]

I believe I covered the concept when I directly stated "offline solution".  

You believe that spouting nonsense covers things?



(and yes I am going to ignore you)

If only I could be so lucky.  Let's test the idiot.... see if he's really gone.

BUT BACK TO THE CENTRAL IDEA OF THIS DISCUSSION, aside from all the drama and side issues, this is really about Bitcoin Governance, and the fact that currently we have a dangerously broken system, and the reason it is broken is because we have people in Comitt positions that are utterly biased, and have serious conflicts of interest.  And the reason it is dangerous is because it is increasing the odds of a divisive hard fork.