Am I a scammer?

[twister]

I have done nothing wrong from the day I joined this forum and just now I got refused to join a sig campaign because my trust is negative? 

[Joel_Jantsen]

Clam down.You don't have any negative feedback.From whom did you by this account though ?Started as a newbie with a Hero Member.Not bad.Probably your seller didn't explain you enough.

[twister]

Clam down.You don't have any negative feedback.From whom did you by this account though ?Started as a newbie with a Hero Member.Not bad.Probably your seller didn't explain you enough.

I didn't bought it. I had a bad trade with a member long ago, where he hired me to do some work and then was stalling the payment and he left me negative for when I called him a scammer. After that he went on and did some trades or hired GREEN trust members as escrow and I guess his trust is now showing up as trusted on my profile.

[kingsart]

I have done nothing wrong from the day I joined this forum and just now I got refused to join a sig campaign because my trust is negative? 

I see Trust:   0: -0 / +0 In your profile!
No I Hope that you're not a scammer!

[twister]

I have done nothing wrong from the day I joined this forum and just now I got refused to join a sig campaign because my trust is negative? 

I see Trust:   0: -0 / +0 In your profile!
No I Hope that you're not a scammer!

I am not. I walk with my head high.

But according to him, I am:

Hey man,

Are there any slots for a Hero member?

Thanks 

Sorry but your trust rating is negative.
Due to our rules you cannot join our campaign.

Best regards.

[InvoKing]

I have done nothing wrong from the day I joined this forum and just now I got refused to join a sig campaign because my trust is negative? 

You didn't receive a negative trust from a default trust member so normally your chances to join any signature compaign is the same as any other member except from few sig comp maybe?
Anyway there is many of them, just join another one (for example secondstrade or yobit...etc) check mitchett topic.

[OnkelPaul]

roslinpl might have the guy who gave you negative trust in his own trust list.
Since the whole issue seems really minor, and the negative trust given to you looks a lot like a revenge action, you might be able to convince roslinpl that you're actually trustworthy.

But whether a signature campaign accepts someone is entirely their own decision. If they don't want to, they don't have to.

Onkel Paul

[Alaki]

roslinpl might have the guy who gave you negative trust in his own trust list.

roslinpl has not added "alesx.onfire" in his trust list. He has the following users in his list.

Code:

 roslinpl->edd
 roslinpl->Lincoln6Echo
 roslinpl->ajareselde 
roslinpl->tiCeR
 roslinpl->dave00
 roslinpl->Junko 
roslinpl->arlekyn13 
roslinpl->ogboz
 roslinpl->Joerii 
roslinpl->ahmed9979 
roslinpl->vervolioman 
roslinpl->goose20 
roslinpl->kalgecin 
roslinpl->coinmaster222 
roslinpl->casinobitcoin 
roslinpl->ndnhc 
roslinpl->marcotheminer 
roslinpl->E.exchanger
 roslinpl->s1lverbox 
roslinpl->Bralex
 roslinpl->kingscrown 
roslinpl->coa032 
roslinpl->shorena 
roslinpl->Bittzy78 
roslinpl->UdjinM6
 roslinpl->NxtChg
 roslinpl->CoinBet 
roslinpl->n3lz0n 
roslinpl->Aggressor66 
roslinpl->bizzyb
 roslinpl->mdzedzej 
roslinpl->venmo 
roslinpl->nrigo
 roslinpl->KingArbinV
 roslinpl->CasinoEvolution 
roslinpl->paradoxal420 
roslinpl->Dogedigital 
roslinpl->Muhammed Zakir
 roslinpl->Jerrietg 
roslinpl->kalisto20022002
 roslinpl->MiningBattalion 
roslinpl->Stars 
roslinpl->Mue 
roslinpl->payzor 
roslinpl->MultiDice 
roslinpl->pagie 
roslinpl->pagalwana 
roslinpl->PrecisionLotus
 roslinpl->james.lent 
roslinpl->Tabata11
 roslinpl->TheAltTrader 
roslinpl->sojuz
 roslinpl->mapsi-fixi 
roslinpl->cjmoles

[mexxer-2]

I have already pointed it out to rosinpl that its a dumb idea to include negs from people that are not in DT, as the deciding factor, but he seems intent on the idea.
His rule seems to be "You should have more positive than negative rating". Pretty dumb I know, try another campaign

[Joel_Jantsen]

I have already pointed it out to rosinpl that its a dumb idea to include negs from people that are not in DT, as the deciding factor, but he seems intent on the idea.
His rule seems to be "You should have more positive than negative rating". Pretty dumb I know, try another campaign

How does it matter to the quality of posts anyway ? Not like the people who have positive trust or no trusts at all have a good posts history.Sounds pretty dumb to me too.

[subSTRATA]

I have already pointed it out to rosinpl that its a dumb idea to include negs from people that are not in DT, as the deciding factor, but he seems intent on the idea.
His rule seems to be "You should have more positive than negative rating". Pretty dumb I know, try another campaign

How does it matter to the quality of posts anyway ? Not like the people who have positive trust or no trusts at all have a good posts history.Sounds pretty dumb to me too.

it doesnt really, but remember, these are companies that are paying for advertising here on the forum, and it doesnt really help them out too much if the people advertising for them appear to be scammers / suspicious individuals.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Dude I have to say that's fucked up, because it was obviously retaliatory spam feedback that was left for you, and it was from a member not on DT.  The campaign manager should use better judgement than that.

[twister]

I have already pointed it out to rosinpl that its a dumb idea to include negs from people that are not in DT, as the deciding factor, but he seems intent on the idea.
His rule seems to be "You should have more positive than negative rating". Pretty dumb I know, try another campaign

How does it matter to the quality of posts anyway ? Not like the people who have positive trust or no trusts at all have a good posts history.Sounds pretty dumb to me too.

it doesnt really, but remember, these are companies that are paying for advertising here on the forum, and it doesnt really help them out too much if the people advertising for them appear to be scammers / suspicious individuals.

So which one am I, scammer or suspicious individual ??

Dude I have to say that's fucked up, because it was obviously retaliatory spam feedback that was left for you, and it was from a member not on DT.  The campaign manager should use better judgement than that.

It feels like a slap on the face you know.

And here I like an idiot recommending him to others (without him knowing) as sig designer:

I'm sorry, but at the moment there aren't any free slot for Hero Member. Please, wait some days, you'll see that a new campaign is coming

Yes, I saw you're having a contest to improve the sig design, which I think is wise btw, the current one is a bit dull.  You should contact medUSA or roslinpl and they will make it even better.

And let me know if and when there is a slot open for Hero Member.

Do good and get good insulted.

[golapani]

I have done nothing wrong from the day I joined this forum and just now I got refused to join a sig campaign because my trust is negative? 

Dude the world is full douchebags , same applies to bitcointalk.if somebody says something bad and you know you did nothing wrong .there is nothing to regret over .let them say blah blah things and keep your head high

[twister]

Dude the world is full douchebags , same applies to bitcointalk.if somebody says something bad and you know you did nothing wrong .there is nothing to regret over .let them say blah blah things and keep your head high

Yeah but they seem to be winning here because they know how to manipulate the system. And I never was good at politics.

Thx for the advice though, appreciate it.

[arbitrage]

Sometimes rules a very stupid, as i see you have a lot of positive feedbacks,
 why didn't they take that in consideration? 
But if they are strict and wont let you in ,then go and find different camping.

[twister]

Sometimes rules a very stupid, as i see you have a lot of positive feedbacks,
 why didn't they take that in consideration? 
But if they are strict and wont let you in ,then go and find different camping.

Its up to the campaign managers to make the rules, I have worked in many campaigns, with lot of managers and none of them had any problems with it, infact I received extra rewards/bonus for being the good poster in most of the campaigns I was a part of. But can't change someone's perception.

And as you can see I already found a campaign.

Closing the thread for now.