peepee (OP)
|
|
December 20, 2012, 07:29:07 PM |
|
WTF?
12/20/12 18:24:37 buy 0.00034001 4901.00000000 1.66638901 12/20/12 18:17:50 buy 0.00034001 77.96600000 0.02650922 12/20/12 18:16:34 buy 0.00034001 222.44400000 0.07563319 12/20/12 18:12:18 buy 0.00034001 2044.00000000 0.69498044 12/20/12 18:04:38 buy 0.00036500 10000.00000000 3.65000000 12/20/12 18:04:38 buy 0.00036498 5683.00000000 2.07418134 12/20/12 18:04:08 buy 0.00034010 20000.00000000 6.80200000 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00036000 100.00000000 0.03600000 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00036000 677.00000000 0.24372000 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00036000 972.00000000 0.34992000 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00036000 1110.00000000 0.39960000 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00036000 18974.72654660 6.83090156 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00035998 1000.00000000 0.35998000 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00035993 5000.00000000 1.79965000 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00035950 2000.00000000 0.71900000 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00035948 2461.00000000 0.88468028 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00035900 50000.00000000 17.95000000 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00035750 13970.00000000 4.99427500 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00035492 35.00000000 0.01242220 12/20/12 17:56:25 buy 0.00035349 4000.00000000 1.41396000 12/20/12 17:55:33 sell 0.00035000 1047.32312275 0.36656310 12/20/12 17:55:17 sell 0.00035000 22000.00000000 7.70000000 12/20/12 17:54:20 buy 0.00035000 340.00000000 0.11900000 12/20/12 17:54:20 buy 0.00034999 6500.00000000 2.27493500 12/20/12 17:54:20 buy 0.00034598 1290.00000000 0.44631420 12/20/12 17:54:20 buy 0.00034597 1000.00000000 0.34597000 12/20/12 17:54:20 buy 0.00034596 281.00000000 0.09721476 12/20/12 17:54:20 buy 0.00033000 14970.00000000 4.94010000 12/20/12 17:54:20 buy 0.00032000 567.00000000 0.18144000 12/20/12 17:54:20 buy 0.00032000 299000.00000000 95.68000000
|
|
|
|
SAC
|
|
December 20, 2012, 08:48:01 PM |
|
Someone preparing for a pump and dump..
|
|
|
|
peepee (OP)
|
|
December 20, 2012, 08:56:29 PM |
|
Someone preparing for a pump and dump..
No. Anyway, there's more bids than ever even after that buy.
|
|
|
|
farlack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1310
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 20, 2012, 09:08:50 PM |
|
Whats that $170?..
|
|
|
|
SAC
|
|
December 20, 2012, 09:09:48 PM |
|
Someone preparing for a pump and dump..
No. If you knew the answer why ask the question?
|
|
|
|
peepee (OP)
|
|
December 20, 2012, 09:15:25 PM |
|
Whats that $170?..
Yeah, about... times 13.5. 0.00034 * 490,000 = 166.6 BTC * $13.50 = $2,249
|
|
|
|
peepee (OP)
|
|
December 20, 2012, 09:17:37 PM |
|
aaaaaand another 100k bought.
Time Type Price (BTC) Amount (PPC) Total (BTC) 12/20/12 21:14:54 buy 0.00036666 94900.00000000 34.79603400 12/20/12 21:14:54 buy 0.00036600 100.00000000 0.03660000
|
|
|
|
farlack
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1310
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 20, 2012, 09:33:49 PM |
|
Whats that $170?..
Yeah, about... times 13.5. 0.00034 * 490,000 = 166.6 BTC * $13.50 = $2,249 I see, tired calculated as cents not btc.
|
|
|
|
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
|
|
December 20, 2012, 10:41:31 PM |
|
History seems to tell us, its purchaser is almost always OP. That said- with so much bought it only needs to go up a tad to make a big profit.
|
more or less retired.
|
|
|
peepee (OP)
|
|
December 20, 2012, 10:58:22 PM |
|
History seems to tell us, its purchaser is almost always OP. That said- with so much bought it only needs to go up a tad to make a big profit. Lol, and like I said last time you accused me of buying.. i WISH i had extra coins just lying around to buy. Why would I buy now when I bought at 0.0001?
|
|
|
|
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
|
|
December 20, 2012, 11:09:54 PM |
|
History seems to tell us, its purchaser is almost always OP. That said- with so much bought it only needs to go up a tad to make a big profit. Lol, and like I said last time you accused me of buying.. i WISH i had extra coins just lying around to buy. Why would I buy now when I bought at 0.0001? hahahah
|
more or less retired.
|
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
December 21, 2012, 03:46:18 PM |
|
Dump all the ppc
It's possible someone else figured out the attack too and has bought that many coins to abuse the proof of stake implementation and generate another bajillion coins.
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
|
|
|
sangaman
|
|
December 21, 2012, 06:31:17 PM |
|
Dump all the ppc
It's possible someone else figured out the attack too and has bought that many coins to abuse the proof of stake implementation and generate another bajillion coins.
How would that vulnerability allow people to generate a bajillion coins? My understanding is it just makes it more feasible to perform double spend attacks without an enormous amount of coins.
|
|
|
|
scrybe
|
|
December 21, 2012, 06:39:05 PM |
|
Dump all the ppc
It's possible someone else figured out the attack too and has bought that many coins to abuse the proof of stake implementation and generate another bajillion coins.
How would that vulnerability allow people to generate a bajillion coins? My understanding is it just makes it more feasible to perform double spend attacks without an enormous amount of coins. Correct, they can drive up the difficulty and revert (but not steal) others up to 5 blocks back. TacoTime is like salsa, he always likes to spice things up. Source: Jutarul has made a disclosure today of a stake generation vulnerability here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=131901.0We have been aware of this vulnerability for a while. A protocol upgrade has been designed and is currently being implemented. Jutarul did not attempt to communicate with us privately before his disclosure today. We appreciate Jutarul's independent research, however given the circumstances it would be more responsible to communicate with me privately to discuss the discovered vulnerability and the schedule of disclosure. I'll give a summary of the impact here: Impact level: severe Description: The current stake generation hashing protocol is vulnerable to a search attack. Attacker gains advantage of generating more blocks with limited coins. Given the current checkpoint policy, the impact on the block chains is mostly limited to: - Attacker may invalidate other nodes' proof-of-stake blocks and force short reorganizations up to 5 blocks (may be mitigated by strengthening the checkpoint policy)
- Pushing up proof-of-stake difficulty to very high level
Given the current checkpoint policy, it is not likely that the following can be achieved by an attacker: - Preventing transactions from being confirmed.
- Minting more coins than normal through the attack.
We will accelerate the development schedule for this fix so stay tuned. I will give an update in my weekly update later this week on the progress of the release.
|
"...as simple as possible, but no simpler" -AE BTC/TRC/FRC: 1ScrybeSNcjqgpPeYNgvdxANArqoC6i5u Ripple:rf9gutfmGB8CH39W2PCeRbLWMKRauYyVfx LTC:LadmiD6tXq7gFZvMibhFUZegUHKXgbu1Gb
|
|
|
tacotime
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
|
|
December 22, 2012, 02:37:50 AM |
|
Dump all the ppc
It's possible someone else figured out the attack too and has bought that many coins to abuse the proof of stake implementation and generate another bajillion coins.
How would that vulnerability allow people to generate a bajillion coins? My understanding is it just makes it more feasible to perform double spend attacks without an enormous amount of coins. My bad, I misread jeratuls post.
|
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
|
|
|
|