Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 01:06:16 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [2016-01-14] Classic? Unlimited? XT? Core?  (Read 286 times)
LiteCoinGuy (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1010


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2016, 04:12:37 PM
 #1

Classic? Unlimited? XT? Core?

Almost two years ago, when I stepped down as lead maintainer for Bitcoin Core, I wrote:

    I’m pleased to be able to focus more on protocol-level, cross-implementation issues and less on issues specific to the Bitcoin Core software.


I’d still like to focus on protocol-level, cross-implementation issues but lately I’ve been distracted and have generated a lot of controversy (and hurt feelings) by helping out with some other implementations (first XT, lately Bitcoin Classic, maybe Bitcoin Unlimited soon.

http://gavinandresen.ninja/classic-unlimited-xt-core

1715216776
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715216776

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715216776
Reply with quote  #2

1715216776
Report to moderator
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715216776
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715216776

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715216776
Reply with quote  #2

1715216776
Report to moderator
Kprawn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1073


View Profile
January 14, 2016, 06:45:41 PM
 #2

Gavin is playing the crowd and doing what the majority wants him to do. He knows most people want some upgrade on the block size and he compromised. Why? ...Let's say for

one moment he gets the consensus and everyone forgives him for the XT fiasco, what then? Do we trust him and his new partners with the development and Lead maintainers

position? Gavin did a great job, when he worked with Satoshi, then he ran to the CIA and Satoshi dissapeared and he took the Lead position... after that things changed. It will

take some time before people will trust him again.  Huh

THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED & PLAYER-OWNED CASINO
.EARNBET..EARN BITCOIN: DIVIDENDS
FOR-LIFETIME & MUCH MORE.
. BET WITH: BTCETHEOSLTCBCHWAXXRPBNB
.JOIN US: GITLABTWITTERTELEGRAM
Denker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1014


View Profile
January 14, 2016, 08:40:56 PM
 #3

Gavin is playing the crowd and doing what the majority wants him to do. He knows most people want some upgrade on the block size and he compromised. Why? ...Let's say for

one moment he gets the consensus and everyone forgives him for the XT fiasco, what then? Do we trust him and his new partners with the development and Lead maintainers

position? Gavin did a great job, when he worked with Satoshi, then he ran to the CIA and Satoshi dissapeared and he took the Lead position... after that things changed. It will

take some time before people will trust him again.  Huh

Great posting.
Gavin is a person I would never ever trust again. Blocksize increase yes I agree with that. But not the way Gavin is trying to push it.
And since XT I'm done with that idiot! He is again using the divide and conquer strategy again.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!